Pet Shop Boys Community

gregf wrote:One of the most famous UFO sightings in the 60s was filmed from a train.
The object hovers for some time then shoots off at fantastic speed.

The film is analysed and the object is calculated to accelerate to 1000s miles per hour.
Everyone gets very excited.

Then someone else saw the same object, from the same train.
Oh dear, it was all a reflection.

UFOlogy was never the same.

it just doesnt look like part of the same reflection to me...i dont want to sound like a nutter, i just dont think it looks like part of the inside of the train reflecting....the lighting, transparency and surface of the object does not match the rest of the 'reflecting parts'....to me, it definitely looks exterior to the train! the opacity of the object is not the same as the 'reflecting parts'!!....it is clearly 'Unidentified'.

if you look at the image below you will see that i took the photo into Adobe Photoshop and added an 'emboss' filter which extrudes and shows 3d objects by bringing them out of the picture. as you can see, the object matches all the other 3d objects in the image, ie the buildings and the hills, the shadows are the same thus showing it is a solid object. if you look at the 'reflecting parts' ie the windows, you will notice that they are not 'standing off the background, coming away from the background but the opposite is happening, all the 'reflecting parts' are in fact recessed into the image. if the object was part of the same reflection then the shadows and performance of the object would match those of the reflection. this is how UFO magazine used to determine 3d objects in photos!
just my opinion guys but it just doesnt match the reflecting parts! i'm not saying its aliens i'm saying its an Unidentified Flying Object. Maybe its the Moon, maybe its Venus, maybe its a bird but it IS clearly part of the actual scenery in the photo.

It was the reflection of the light from the train.

Pet Shop Girl wrote:It was the reflection of the light from the train.

Says who?

canveyboy wrote:

Pet Shop Girl wrote:It was the reflection of the light from the train.

Says who?

And you are sure it is not?

Pet Shop Girl wrote:

canveyboy wrote:

Pet Shop Girl wrote:It was the reflection of the light from the train.

Says who?

And you are sure it is not?

yes i am sure....my evidence substantiates my facts. what is your evidence that it is part of the reflection?

Oh boy! Who cares, its just a text picture.

Pet Shop Girl wrote:Oh boy! Who cares, its just a text picture.

if you dont care then dont have a debate with me!

i'd say that was either something on the lens or something in the sky. It's not a reflection. You can tell what a reflection would be like by the one of the window in the middle of the picture.

Dave

I stand corrected. The embossed picture clearly shows it is outside the train. What it is, is anyone's guess!

OH yes it is a UFO and ET, Vince Clarke aka Gollum are sticking out of it.

Undertaker wrote:i'd say that was either something on the lens or something in the sky. It's not a reflection. You can tell what a reflection would be like by the one of the window in the middle of the picture.

Dave

thank you Dave.....finally someone else can clearly see that its not a reflection!!!
dirt on the lens? i hadn't thought of that, thats a possibility too!...so, still unidentified!

I've seen lots of UFO's lately, mainly flying across next door's lawn about head height. They were yellow as well.

Pet Shop Girl wrote:OH yes it is a UFO and ET, Vince Clarke aka Gollum are sticking out of it.

Yes, after failing with the meteor shower, Vince Clarke is planning another attack!

Technotrancemix wrote:I've seen lots of UFO's lately, mainly flying across next door's lawn about head height. They were yellow as well.

What had you been taking? Can I have some?

Oh yes, you know Gollum, he wants that ring too!

Fugitive1979 wrote:I stand corrected. The embossed picture clearly shows it is outside the train. What it is, is anyone's guess!

you know its being considered here as if reversing or embossing the image is some kind of bombshell from the CSI forensic lab.

I could see if embossing or reversing the image uncovered something different, yet all it has done is show the exact same image ......only reversed/embossed!

the reflective window is in the same place, therefore the ceiling light is still in the same place where lights usually are.above the window. lights are dominate. were you expecting to see the ceiling? lights are dominate/ not dark walls...and ones in a reflection no less!

also, not for anything, its not like neil or chris dont notice interesting things in the pictures they themselves take. it wasnt even brought up, as they were on the train and know full well it was just a light on the ceiling of the interior of the train and didnt even take note of anything peculiar in the picture.

and I believe in u.f.o.'s by the way.