Online Petition to release Integral!

Message

Gin Soaked Boy · #16 Post by **Gin Soaked Boy** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 3:42 am

Paddymacall wrote:I hope this changes their mind... Sooner rather than later!

Get signing!

http://www.petitiononline.com/PSB1D4/petition.html

Durst started a petition to have Relentless reissued. This will make no difference.

glennjridge · #17 Post by **glennjridge** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 4:33 am

new songs. I dont care one way or the other about integral as a single at all.
the petition might not do anything except maybe for once they might get some negative reaction from their hardcore audience.

I'm still a little surprised they dont know what we like by now. its not all that much, we like to hear a couple new songs thats all.

singysingysingy · #18 Post by **singysingysingy** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 5:59 am

Signed! But only 47 people so far. Come on! But maybe even 47.000 won't change anything. This is no democraty...

fredleo · #19 Post by **fredleo** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 6:33 am

singysingysingy, 48 Now

singysingysingy · #20 Post by **singysingysingy** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 6:43 am

fredleo wrote:singysingysingy, 48 Now

YEAH!!! Well done!

Panbaams · #21 Post by **Panbaams** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 8:54 am

53 signatures. That'll shake EMI's global marketing drive.

MarcoS · #22 Post by **MarcoS** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 8:58 am

Signed!

Flaffer · #23 Post by **Flaffer** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 9:38 am

ClyCly wrote:I do not agree with this thing at all. PSB are the ones who are the boss and it's up to them to have the last word about what to release and not release.

I'd put money on that not being the case, remember Londons UK release being cancelled. The boys used to be able to choose what singles were released, but that was back when they were a hell of a lot more popular than now

Kris · #24 Post by **Kris** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 9:39 am

Paddymacall wrote:
Agreed. I'm pretty sure PSB did want to release Integral but were talked out of it by the powers-that-be. And to be honest, you can't blame EMI for doing so as the single would have made a loss anyway
How would it be a loss?

Most singles make a loss for the record company these days. I think you have to sell something like 75,000 - 100,000 copies just to break even, and Integral would have got nowhere near those figures. Therefore, it's unsurprising that EMI are clearly not going to back its release, especially as it is also very unlikely to have any bearing on future album sales (Fundamental or Disco 4).

E-Mail Vampire · #25 Post by **E-Mail Vampire** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 9:48 am

All complaints/comments to

mailto:enquiries@emimusic.co.uk

Pet Shop Girl · #26 Post by **Pet Shop Girl** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 1:37 pm

Yes but still no point in any petition. Honestly no point at all.

Nightlife · #27 Post by **Nightlife** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 1:40 pm

It's so very childish.

Tenlow · #28 Post by **Tenlow** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 2:16 pm

Panbaams wrote:53 signatures. That'll shake EMI's global marketing drive.

If we get to 100 and more things could become interesting. That should be 50 % of the sales of Disco 3 then. Maybe they are getting nervous then

Radiophonic · #29 Post by **Radiophonic** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 2:17 pm

Do these things ever work?

Danger · #30 Post by **Danger** » Tue 07 Aug 2007, 3:04 pm

I've signed the petition altough I'm a fanatic PSB fan, I hate the idea that PSB and EMI thinks that all the fans are so stupid to buy a collection of remixes of other artists with some tracks near to the pension for its age

Online Petition to release Integral!

Re: Online Petition to release Integral!