Page 2 of 2

Re: Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Fri 16 Apr 2010, 2:48 pm
by Patrick Bateman
What was Michael Jackson banned for?

Re: Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Fri 16 Apr 2010, 8:54 pm
by Undertaker
FirthofForth wrote:I would speak up, but I don't want Drico to reveal my past identity for Undertaker to rake on me about. Could reach full scale thermonuclear in here.
Speak up? No one listens to you anyway, matey. A lot of people have a pretty good idea who you are. You are Durst.

As for ''raking on about you,'' Like i said, i know who you are and since i've had my opinion on you, i've not bothered with you since because i don't want anything to do with you. So how's about stopping thinking it's all about you. I've told you 'Michael ' was a former banned member and was correct.

Shall we get back on topic? Jibber away all you like but there is really no more to say on the issue.

Hi Neil! Can you post a text message to get us all back on topic? Durst is getting wound up ;)

Re: Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Fri 16 Apr 2010, 9:32 pm
by Ghost within this house
Undertaker wrote:
FirthofForth wrote:I would speak up, but I don't want Drico to reveal my past identity for Undertaker to rake on me about. Could reach full scale thermonuclear in here.
Speak up? No one listens to you anyway, matey. A lot of people have a pretty good idea who you are. You are Durst.

As for ''raking on about you,'' Like i said, i know who you are and since i've had my opinion on you, i've not bothered with you since because i don't want anything to do with you. So how's about stopping thinking it's all about you. I've told you 'Michael ' was a former banned member and was correct.

Shall we get back on topic? Jibber away all you like but there is really no more to say on the issue.

Hi Neil! Can you post a text message to get us all back on topic? Durst is getting wound up ;)
Boo, hiss. You've spoiled the fun now...

Re: Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Fri 16 Apr 2010, 10:22 pm
by Undertaker
Ghost within this house wrote:
Undertaker wrote:
FirthofForth wrote:I would speak up, but I don't want Drico to reveal my past identity for Undertaker to rake on me about. Could reach full scale thermonuclear in here.
Speak up? No one listens to you anyway, matey. A lot of people have a pretty good idea who you are. You are Durst.

As for ''raking on about you,'' Like i said, i know who you are and since i've had my opinion on you, i've not bothered with you since because i don't want anything to do with you. So how's about stopping thinking it's all about you. I've told you 'Michael ' was a former banned member and was correct.

Shall we get back on topic? Jibber away all you like but there is really no more to say on the issue.

Hi Neil! Can you post a text message to get us all back on topic? Durst is getting wound up ;)
Boo, hiss. You've spoiled the fun now...
Lol i doubt it. No one ever takes notice of me.

Re: Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Fri 16 Apr 2010, 10:55 pm
by York Minster
Haha, Undertaker, you silly sh%t. That was a "piss take" my friend. Baited you right in. Now, still waiting for your comments on the very first post I made in the forum in the nubes section.

Also, you ever have a look at my youtube channel rarepsb? Just curious how good your research is. It seems like it's been fairly scant thus far.

And you did see the picture of me in the mirror, right? You ever seen Durst? Hmmm. Foolish fool.

Looks like Drico unveiled Micheal. Shame on you Micheal. But I didn't have sexual relations with that man, Durst. And if I did, may Drico strike me down!

Re: Split From Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Sat 17 Apr 2010, 5:52 am
by Undertaker
Another post and another 20 seconds of confusion :lol:

What do you keep going on about, Jeff?? Starting to get more and more aggressive, i see :mrgreen: xx

Re: Split From Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Sat 17 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
by York Minster
Sure, Undertaker. What would be really curious is if 1. You gave any actual evidence why you believe I'm Durst. 2. If Drico or StevePSB or anyone else could back up your claim with any evidence. But, alas, you've got nothing. A bit sad you just have to end this without proving your point. Would love to see you do it.

Re: Split From Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Sat 17 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
by Undertaker
FirthofForth wrote:Sure, Undertaker. What would be really curious is if 1. You gave any actual evidence why you believe I'm Durst. 2. If Drico or StevePSB or anyone else could back up your claim with any evidence. But, alas, you've got nothing. A bit sad you just have to end this without proving your point. Would love to see you do it.
Of course i can't prove it. The mods probably wont be able too either. As fantastic as the internet is, it still can't fingerprint people or access their DNA. I had no proof that our great mate 'Michael' was using yet another alias but it's too obvious that's exactly what he was doing and i was right. Obviously the mods must have had some good evidence, like IP adresses that were a match, or very close to a match. Like i said, he was too thick to hide it :D

As for you, i couldn't care less what ebay pics or youtube channel you tell us (me) to look at. I still think you are Durst. Obviously you aren't going to post the vile posts he used to post because you will be kicked off. Although your posts are getting more irate, not just with myself but a few others too. It must be really annoying that you can't post the insults you used to post and what everyone knows you for.

Durst used to post constant threads that never went anywhere. Similar to what you do. However, fair's fair, I'll not throw anymore accusations your way. I stand by my opinion about you but wont comment anymore, unless you carry on the discussion.

Re: Split From Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Sat 17 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
by glennjridge
never saw anything wrong with michael,he was A-OK in my book at least.

Re: Split From Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Sat 17 Apr 2010, 3:03 pm
by Undertaker
glennjridge wrote:never saw anything wrong with michael,he was A-OK in my book at least.
There probably wasn't much wrong with 'Michaels' posts but he's a former banned member a.k.a bigboy and several other names. He's been banned several times before.

Re: Split From Neil & Chris Texts

Posted: Sat 17 Apr 2010, 3:11 pm
by York Minster
Yeah, Michael's fine, except he did apparently have sexual relations with mrs. lewinski.
Durst used to post constant threads that never went anywhere. Similar to what you do. However, fair's fair, I'll not throw anymore accusations your way. I stand by my opinion about you but wont comment anymore, unless you carry on the discussion.
Fine, we'll leave it at this. But here's the truth: I don't know who Jeff Durst is. I remember reading some post of his on a website years ago where he was excoriating some of the fan community, but that's all I know about him. I am new to this forum as of early last year. While I have posts that may 1. Offend some or 2. Not be overly relevant or too abstruse, I also make some posts that are popular and contribute to the community. I think Drico has pointed this out. Simply put, I don't edit my content into user friendly writing sometimes, and I get a bit manic as well. I have a goofball sense of humour which doesn't always translate. But I'm sure some of my posts must differentiate me from Durst? Anyway, there is a member of this community called Ellie. She's shy, and she rarely posts, and she's known me since before I joined the forum. She can vouch that I'm not that guy, although we aren't on speaking terms, and since she's shy, she's unlikely to post or want to get involved at all in this discussion. I know you can't prove that I'm him, but the question is do you have reasonable evidence other than I make some strange posts. I hear there is this guy weirdalfan1980, apparently he did the same? Am I him as well? I can gaurentee you this, I'm not good at keeping my mouth shut. If I was Durst, I'd be kicked off already for expressing what I really think.