Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 1:12 pm
by Eldritch
jamie1978 wrote:I think people are running away with a few bizarre assumptions here.
Here is an idea for you, which would seem to make more sense:
They were working on 10 songs. Now they are working on 12. The answer to this mysterious 'riddle'? They wrote two more songs. Not very complicated when you stop and think about it, is it.
Especially as PSB have never been one of those bands who record 12 songs and release them as an album. They have always done extra tracks for the b-sides and such.
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 2:50 pm
by Nickname
Eldritch wrote:jamie1978 wrote:I think people are running away with a few bizarre assumptions here.
Here is an idea for you, which would seem to make more sense:
They were working on 10 songs. Now they are working on 12. The answer to this mysterious 'riddle'? They wrote two more songs. Not very complicated when you stop and think about it, is it.
Especially as PSB have never been one of those bands who record 12 songs and release them as an album. They have always done extra tracks for the b-sides and such.
They probably are B-sides. Because if they are working on 12 songs for the new album, it would include 13 songs (Numb has been made long time ago).
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 2:53 pm
by Zeus On The Loose
For God's sake
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 2:55 pm
by Nickname
Zeus On The Loose wrote:For God's sake
You are very nervous, aren't you?
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 2:59 pm
by Zeus On The Loose
If the current rate of how many songs the new album will include and if X are b'sides and what everyone thinks about Trevor Horn's work on the Seal album posts is kept up, I'll probably end up suicidal, really...
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 3:00 pm
by Kiran
I don't suppose they'd like to release the album in December as a Christmas present?
No? Thought not.....
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 3:16 pm
by Nickname
Zeus On The Loose wrote:If the current rate of how many songs the new album will include and if X are b'sides and what everyone thinks about Trevor Horn's work on the Seal album posts is kept up, I'll probably end up suicidal, really...
How can you expect to be taken seriously?
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 3:44 pm
by jamie1978
10 tracks.... 12 tracks.... who cares
No-one knows anything for certain. Its just bizarre assumption after bizarre assumption.
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 3:47 pm
by Nickname
jamie1978 wrote:10 tracks.... 12 tracks.... who cares
No-one knows anything for certain. Its just bizarre assumption after bizarre assumption.
Of course, it's not very important. But I think is fun, something to talk about. Better than nothing.
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 3:50 pm
by jamie1978
nickname wrote:jamie1978 wrote:10 tracks.... 12 tracks.... who cares
No-one knows anything for certain. Its just bizarre assumption after bizarre assumption.
Of course, it's not very important. But I think is fun, something to talk about. Better than nothing.
I disagree.
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 4:49 pm
by Zeus On The Loose
nickname wrote:Zeus On The Loose wrote:If the current rate of how many songs the new album will include and if X are b'sides and what everyone thinks about Trevor Horn's work on the Seal album posts is kept up, I'll probably end up suicidal, really...
How can you expect to be taken seriously?
Here's a hint:
viewtopic.php?t=8798
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 5:05 pm
by joncool5
The 12 Trevor Horn produced songs (including Numb) will form the basis of the new album. They all might fit on the album or if they don't the remainders will be used as b-sides. The rest of the b-sides will probably comprise of songs they were working on before Horn came on board. As the album is still to be completed, PSB won't know how many tracks will be on the final version. 'Release' was going to consist of 11 tracks, but even after the album was completed and mixed they/EMI had time to make the decision that 'Searching For The Face of Jesus' was going to be dropped.
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 5:10 pm
by Zeus On The Loose
It was 'I Didn't Get Where I Am Today' that was dropped.
Posted: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 5:16 pm
by joncool5
You're actually right
(for once)
Posted: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 9:56 am
by Kiran
joncool5 wrote: They all might fit on the album or if they don't the remainders will be used as b-sides.
Couldn't they just use a slightly bigger CD so they can all fit on?