I'm with Stupid Video

Message

Syncratic · #151 Post by **Syncratic** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 12:45 am

moxlox wrote:Has no-one noticed that they are wearing Guantanamo Bay style outfits?

In fact PSB tied up against their will could be a euphemism for the detainees at Guantanemo...but I could be stretching things there...

Yes, I noted that. It was probably intentional. The original costumes are red in the Can you forgive her? vid.

Hmmm · #152 Post by **Hmmm** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 12:50 am

Eldritch wrote:I would say that it's purveyor.

of electronic music..
And it is .. We have become "Pet Shop Boy" not Boys

moxlox wrote:
Has no-one noticed that they are wearing Guantanamo Bay style outfits?

In fact PSB tied up against their will could be a euphemism for the detainees at Guantanemo...but I could be stretching things there...

Syncratic
Yes, I noted that. It was probably intentional. The original costumes are red in the Can you forgive her? vid.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The cover Art work for Can you forgive her? is Orange cover alls. so this would be correct

Syncratic · #153 Post by **Syncratic** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 1:04 am

I thought the *original* costumes for Can you forgive her? were red. I must be slightly colour blind.

In any case I still think the prisoner analogy is intentional.

Hmmm · #154 Post by **Hmmm** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 1:11 am

Drico One.. stated the case that it's a homage to PSB .

This is a PSB video in which the PSBs are to be celebrated. Walliams is a fan - as proven by his embarrassing but fascinating car crash style infatuation during Liberation's Top of the Pops performance in 1994 - and is obviously living a fan's dream in creating a pastiche of classic PSB iconography. There's something touching about that. Add to the fact that he's an up and coming celebrity, his eager willingness to recreate the PSB world in his own comic style is heart-warming and hugely complementary to the influence of Tennant and Lowe.

Broooklyn · #155 Post by **Broooklyn** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 1:22 am

Hmmm wrote:
Eldritch wrote:I would say that it's purveyor.
of electronic music..
And it is .. We have become "Pet Shop Boy" not Boys

Believe me, he says "We have become "Pet Shop Boys". Would it honestly make any sense for him to say Pet Shop Boy? Put on headphones, and you will clearly hear the "s".

Hmmm · #156 Post by **Hmmm** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 1:34 am

There is no SSSSSS look at the Hat, 6 sets of Ears have just played this on 5.1 dolby sound and there is no S ...
Any way... I'm Chris Lowe ..I'm the other One ...

As Chris says pure T4 how come we are not Number One..

Broooklyn · #157 Post by **Broooklyn** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 1:37 am

Hmmm wrote:There is no SSSSSS look at the Hat, 6 sets of Ears have just played this on 5.1 dolby sound and there is no S ...

I do not care if you have dolby 21.7 sound. There is an "s". Put on headphones.

Hmmm · #158 Post by **Hmmm** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 1:42 am

Headphones have been on there is still no S as I said look at Matts Hat there is a clue there unless you think I need Glasses as well..

Broooklyn · #159 Post by **Broooklyn** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 1:46 am

I see Matt's hat. The hat even if it says Boy on it, means nothing. Chris' hat during that period of time said "Boy" The S is there. Even if you hear it, you will not admit to it anyway. Why am I even discussing such a trivial issue? This site never fails to totally make issues out of nothing.

Hmmm · #160 Post by **Hmmm** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 1:54 am

I hear No S Chameleonpsb could not hear an S I have put what I hear as Chris say's on T4 "You'v added something that was'nt there"

Broooklyn · #161 Post by **Broooklyn** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 2:00 am

I will accept that the two of you can not hear it, but it is there.

S=yes.

If I did not hear an S, I would not even be having this absolutely ridiculous discussion.

Ghost within this house · Sun 16 Apr 2006, 2:02 am

hey, perhaps they were barefoot too - maybe one of them is going to die..

Hmmm · #163 Post by **Hmmm** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 2:10 am

We all do, the only thing is if you are worried about it or not

.

We could get weirdalfan1980 to run a poll ..S or No S as the Video is all tongue in Cheek

Broooklyn · #164 Post by **Broooklyn** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 2:24 am

Hmmm wrote: We all do, the only thing is if you are worried about it or not .

We could get weirdalfan1980 to run a poll ..S or No S as the Video is all tongue in Cheek

=) Well considering Eldritch's fantastic interview, seeing that Neil does read the boards, we at least supplied him with yet another discussion to smash his head against the desk about as he tweets a high pitched laugh as a companion piece.

Dipso · #165 Post by **Dipso** » Sun 16 Apr 2006, 5:20 am

I love the Pets and I love Lucas and Walliams so this is all rather fabulous for Dipso. David`s comedy teeth are a bit worrying, mind.