Pet Shop Boys Community

The difference with the Muslim paedos is that they specifically chose to target white girls, so as not to sully their own children. Just as with previous cases, the most sinister aspect is that social services were scared to get involved because of the hegemony of PC culture.

Patrick Bateman wrote:The difference with the Muslim paedos is that they specifically chose to target white girls, so as not to sully their own children. Just as with previous cases, the most sinister aspect is that social services were scared to get involved because of the hegemony of PC culture.

Is that acceptable for you Drico? Or should Bateman be focussing on British white only crimes like I apparently am?

Raggatwins taxes going to a good cause:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... sylum.html

JSDOUVRES wrote:Bateman posts as much as I do but doesn't get blasted for it so why pick on me?

He's Michael Douglas to your Alf Garnett. I disagree with lots of what he posts in this thread - I find some of his views reactionary - but I'd never consider him racist simply because he isn't obsessed by the "other" in the way you are. In his posts, he almost invariably ends up pointing the finger at the British elite - not the foreigner. You, on the other hand, make profoundly ignorant statements based on race - such as the laughable idea that there are "not many cases of white men" involved in that type of crime - despite, for example, high-profile evidence to the contrary, such as what's gone on in North Wales, the April Jones case, and the whole Jimmy Savile scandal. Clearly, to you, the foreigner is inherently more depraved. That's the implication of your comment.

If you were concerned about "Broken Britain", you'd be concerned about ALL of its crime - not just the crime committed by minorities or foreigners. You differentiate almost solely on race or religion, highlighting the crimes of minorities almost exclusively. That's why your opinions give me the creeps. You demonise minorities by pointing to the criminal element among them as their true representation when it is what it is, the criminal element among them. There's no point saying you can't post about "all the white crime", you just don't post about it AT ALL - unlike others. That's clearly because it doesn't suit your agenda. Consequently, people make their own judgments on what you post. So, to sum up, I think you hold some very iffy views. I've formed that opinion based on the evidence before me. Like I said, other than that, I'm sure you're a spiffing fellow.

Drico.

Patrick Bateman wrote:The difference with the Muslim paedos is that they specifically chose to target white girls, so as not to sully their own children.

I don't see much difference, to be honest. I see a paedophile gang. The race or ethnicity of the perpetrators or the victims doesn't change the heinous nature of the crime or the damage done to the targets. Their crime would hardly have been less heinous had fellow Muslims been their victims. These guys are just depraved. Are they racist, too? Perhaps they are, or perhaps they are simply opportunistic, but that's in the halfpenny pace when compared with the crime. I don't think we can construe that they are representative of all Muslims, though - not that I think you are saying that. I'm sure others are, however - and that's what feeds into this "PC culture" you talk about. People get uncomfortable because they know full well that there are plenty of people out there waiting to demonise all members of a minority based on the actions of a depraved minority. Stories like this merit reporting - they are in the public interest - but they are also used by some media organs as dog whistles to attract the bigots - people who need no encouragement to demonise the outsider.

Drico.

Drico One wrote:

JSDOUVRES wrote:Bateman posts as much as I do but doesn't get blasted for it so why pick on me?

He's Michael Douglas to your Alf Garnett. I disagree with lots of what he posts in this thread - I find some of his views reactionary - but I'd never consider him racist simply because he isn't obsessed by the "other" in the way your are. In his posts, he almost invariably ends up pointing the finger at the British elite - not the foreigner. You, on the other hand, make profoundly ignorant statements based on race - such as the laughable idea that "you don't get as many white men" involved in that type of crime - despite, for example, high-profile evidence to the contrary, such as what's gone on in North Wales, the April Jones case, and the whole Jimmy Savile scandal. Clearly, to you, the foreigner is inherently more depraved. That's the implication of your comment.

If you were concerned about "Broken Britain", you'd be concerned about ALL of its crime - not just the crime committed by minorities or foreigners. You differentiate almost solely on race or religion, highlighting the crimes of minorities almost exclusively. That's why your opinions give me the creeps. You demonise minorities by pointing to the criminal element among them as their true representation when it is what it is, the criminal element among them. There's no point saying you can't post about "all the white crime", you just don't post about it AT ALL - unlike others. That's clearly because it doesn't suit your agenda. Consequently, people make their own judgments on what you post. So, to sum up, I think you hold some very iffy views. I've formed that opinion based on the evidence before me. Like I said, other than that, I'm sure you're a spiffing fellow.

Drico.

So I am supposed to post about all crimes commited in this country in this thread? Or a certain percentage of "white only" crimes perhaps to please you "racist" accusing types? Or is that not in itself racist? We've gone through this a million times but still you talk bollocks about this stuff.
This is an internet forum and I am free to post whatever stories I want in the "Broken Britain" thread and immigration is what I believe is one of the things most broken about this country. And as Bateman said, these Asian rape gangs were not your typical crimes, it was calculated rape of vunerable British white girls being handed round by groups of Pakistani men, often related and is an astonishing crime that deserves it's place here in the Broken Britain thread. These are immigrants doing crimes that were largely ignored in order not to offend people like you. Oh dear the daily mail has the guts to publish these stories, must be racist?? Pathetic. And Saville etc has been discussed on this board and is equally as terrible but you cannot tell me what I can/cannot or should/should not post.
Is that alright spiffing fellow?

"This is an internet forum and I am free to post whatever stories I want in the "Broken Britain" thread and immigration is what I believe is one of the things most broken about this country"

Who is stopping you?

Let me make it simple for you:

If you post obsessively and almost exclusively about the crimes of minorities when they make up only a percentage of the total crime in a country - people may surmise that you are racist.

It really is that simple. That's not PC, that's not "pathetic", it's a matter of fact.

Drico.

From the daily mail:
Of course, the vast majority of people from Muslim communities are decent, hard-working citizens, and people of all races and creeds are capable of evil. But there is no doubt that a disproportionate number of Muslim males are involved in sex-grooming gangs in Britain.

And the fear of being branded racist or anti-Muslim in politically correct modern Britain has meant that the authorities have ignored the cries of parents such as Rachel’s mother.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -gang.html

It is the pathetic PC brigade of this country that has lead to a lot of innocent young girls being rapped and abused. Proud of that? Or should we focus more here on "white men" crimes Drico?

And are there groups of British white men working in rape groups like these scum? I think not. deserves to be in the Broken Britain thread, no doubt about that.

JSDOUVRES wrote:And are there groups of British white men working in rape groups like these scum? I think not.

Are you seriously suggesting that there are not any indigenous British paedophile rings?

We should focus on ALL crime. We should focus on the crime - not the ethnicity of the criminal. The crime is what's relevant. You, however, prefer to focus overwhelmingly on the crime committed by minority elements. If somebody does that, people may reasonably surmise that that person holds racist views.

There really is nothing more to add other than to say that just because somebody fears being branded a racist doesn't automatically preclude the possibility that they are racist.

Drico.

Drico One wrote:We should focus on ALL crime. You, however, prefer to focus overwhelmingly on the crime committed by minority elements. If somebody does that, people may reasonably surmise that that person holds racist views.

There really is nothing more to add other than to say that just because somebody fears being branded a racist doesn't automatically preclude the possibility that they are racist.

Drico.

This is a Broken Britain thread, sorry, am I specifically supposed to only focus on crimes commited by British white men? Isn't that racist Drico? Shouldn't you know better?

I prefer to focus on serious crimes that I believe should be in the Broken Britain thread. Like these scum rapists. Sorry if it makes you "uncomfortable". It's people like you that stopped these scum rapists getting stopped in the first place. "Racist". My arse.

And there are white British criminals? Really? I never knew.

I'm getting blasted because I have the balls to write about these things. Ridiculous. What has the country come to?

JSDOUVRES wrote: This is a Broken Britain thread, sorry, am I specifically supposed to only focus on crimes commited by British white men? Isn't that racist Drico? Shouldn't you know better?

Are you genuinely struggling with the basic concept of balance? Nobody has said you should focus on anything. I am saying that if a person focuses overwhelmingly on the crimes of minorities when those crimes make up only a proportion of total criminality, then it's fair to say that people may quite reasonably surmise that that person is quite probably a racist.

JSDOUVRES wrote:I prefer to focus on serious crimes that I believe should be in the Broken Britain thread.

Yes, indeed you do - and overwhelmingly these appear to be the crimes committed by the criminals of minority groupings in society. That's quite illuminating. It's not that you post about minority crime - it's that you post overwhelmingly about minority crime. There's a complete lack of balance in your targets of choice. That suggests an agenda.

JSDOUVRES wrote:It's people like you that stopped these scum rapists getting stopped in the first place.

I'm the cause of the rapes now, am I? If you really believe that, then there's no point in me having a relatively civil discussion with you.

Drico.

"To a girl of 11, 12 or 13, it is alluring to have a group of handsome boyfriends. But after a week or two, it is always pay-back time."

They're hardly One Direction, are they?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -work.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... EJOHN.html

Patrick Bateman wrote:The difference with the Muslim paedos is that they specifically chose to target white girls, so as not to sully their own children. Just as with previous cases, the most sinister aspect is that social services were scared to get involved because of the hegemony of PC culture.

Muslim men are more likely to target non muslim - not white-children as the high levles of integration in 'their' community makes the chances of detection much greater.

Btw, Eastern europe has millions of white muslims.....