Page 16 of 19

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Fri 20 Sep 2013, 2:53 am
by retrofuturist
Any sign of West End Girls at the lower end of the UK singles chart?

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Fri 20 Sep 2013, 3:44 pm
by Disco.
Not really, but it ha re-entered i-Tunes Top 1500 singles. Its #1167 at the moment.

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Fri 20 Sep 2013, 5:14 pm
by tottenhammattspurs
Disco. wrote:Not really, but it ha re-entered i-Tunes Top 1500 singles. Its #1167 at the moment.
That's about 8 downloads then!

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Fri 20 Sep 2013, 6:46 pm
by Disco.
tottenhammattspurs wrote:
Disco. wrote:Not really, but it ha re-entered i-Tunes Top 1500 singles. Its #1167 at the moment.
That's about 8 downloads then!
Almost ! Chart research has shown that if you are at #1500 on I-Tunes for a whole chart week, you sell something in the region of 200- 230 downloads, obviously the specific number will vary.

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Thu 26 Sep 2013, 3:42 pm
by Disco.
Discography #176 this week.

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Thu 26 Sep 2013, 3:48 pm
by Disco.
West End girls is stitting at #1253 the moment. Has been as "high" as #850.(i-Tunes) Has sold in the region of 500-700 downloads in the last week.

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Sun 13 Oct 2013, 8:58 pm
by Disco.
Has sold more than 2,000 copies since it re-entered the i-Tunes top 1500.

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Sat 19 Oct 2013, 1:19 pm
by stussyboy
How much does an artist & songwriter earn from a 99p download? 25p maybe?

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Sat 19 Oct 2013, 2:23 pm
by tottenhammattspurs
25p? No way. At best 10% so 9.9p but more likely about 5%

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Sat 19 Oct 2013, 3:33 pm
by stussyboy
tottenhammattspurs wrote:25p? No way. At best 10% so 9.9p but more likely about 5%
A scandal! Who makes all the money? Apple, EMI must take a cut but as performers, writers, publishers and copyright holders surely PSB Partnership must take more than 10%?

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Sat 19 Oct 2013, 4:00 pm
by Nickname
Neil said they should have won more money taking into account how succesful they have been.

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Sat 19 Oct 2013, 4:00 pm
by Nickname
Double post.

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Sat 19 Oct 2013, 4:04 pm
by tottenhammattspurs
Bearing in mind that back in 1997 George Michael negotiated and unprecedented 6% when rejoining Sony, most artists will be on less. Although the way music is purchased has changed, contracts have not.

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Sat 19 Oct 2013, 7:36 pm
by Disco.
There was an article recently, I think that it was in Music Week, not entirely sure though, but it stated that under "normal" circumstances, an artist was paid 12p from a download Apple and the record company shared the rest. If an artist owned the copyright its share would be higher. The PSB share will be quite high, at least for Electric and the singles from it, since they pay for everything more or less, and then license it to Kobalt. Neil has stated that the income they get from each copy sold is vastly higher, than what they received from their contract with EMI.

Re: Pet Shop Boys - Chart History

Posted: Sat 19 Oct 2013, 7:52 pm
by stussyboy
I can see what Prince was banging on about for all those years now...