Page 155 of 155
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 6:57 pm
by NotInvisible
davidctecno wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 4:15 pm
Motoring:
It’s awful. Not everything is worth releasing: there was no need to put out this demo. There are some demos in the *Further Listening* sets that don't add anything of value.
I agree it's awful, but it raises an interesting question. Would we rather have a perfectly curated catalogue or would we rather have a chance to hear the doodles, sketches and missed targets?
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 7:45 pm
by NOBODY75
Sammy Jenkis wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 4:39 pm
It's not an attempt to write in the style of Brecht/Weill by any chance? The combination of chord change, production and tune remind me of what keeps mankind alive.
Initially, I’d lean towards option B. But then I listen to Motoring, and I jump headfirst into option A.
Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless
Posted: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 7:48 pm
by NOBODY75
NotInvisible wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 6:57 pm
davidctecno wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2026, 4:15 pm
Motoring:
It’s awful. Not everything is worth releasing: there was no need to put out this demo. There are some demos in the *Further Listening* sets that don't add anything of value.
I agree it's awful, but it raises an interesting question. Would we rather have a perfectly curated catalogue or would we rather have a chance to hear the doodles, sketches and missed targets?
Initially, I’d lean towards option B. But then I listen to Motoring, and I jump headfirst into option A.