Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
petshopgrrl
Posts: 778
Joined: Wed 03 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2401 Post by petshopgrrl »

davidctecno wrote: Thu 13 Aug 2026, 9:32 pm rTack 159: Bright Your Things (demo version) Chronology: Release FL CD1:13
Bright Your Things Chronology: Release FL CD2:17


Soundtrack to the 2003 film of the same name. Elegant synth-pop production featuring producer Chris Zippel. An infectious, immersive rhythm that remains true to the duo's classic style while offering a sophisticated atmosphere. Another great b-side!!!
Surely Bright Young Things? :lol: And potential soundtrack since it was never used in the end (FOR SHAME!!!!).

I adore the full version of this - it has so much more drama than the demo. Another evocative lyric, where I can see the whole party playing out in my head, and gorgeous melody.

My headcanon is that the song is sung from the perspective of a very old former Bright Young Thing who's sitting on a park bench in Berkeley Square, remembering the good times. The words "it's time..." always make me think he's about to expire right there and then... :(
For your own good, call me tonight.

davidctecno
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun 30 May 2010, 8:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2402 Post by davidctecno »

petshopgrrl wrote: Fri 14 Aug 2026, 5:06 am
davidctecno wrote: Thu 13 Aug 2026, 9:32 pm rTack 159: Bright Young Things (demo version) Chronology: Release FL CD1:13
Bright Young Things Chronology: Release FL CD2:17


Soundtrack to the 2003 film of the same name???. Elegant synth-pop production featuring producer Chris Zippel. An infectious, immersive rhythm that remains true to the duo's classic style while offering a sophisticated atmosphere. Another great b-side!!!
Surely Bright Young Things? :lol: And potential soundtrack since it was never used in the end (FOR SHAME!!!!).

I adore the full version of this - it has so much more drama than the demo. Another evocative lyric, where I can see the whole party playing out in my head, and gorgeous melody.

My headcanon is that the song is sung from the perspective of a very old former Bright Young Thing who's sitting on a park bench in Berkeley Square, remembering the good times. The words "it's time..." always make me think he's about to expire right there and then... :(

User avatar
Birthday Boy
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri 20 Dec 2024, 11:13 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2403 Post by Birthday Boy »

Bright young things is awesome, and I'm glad that this thread reminded me of its existance, because I haven't listened to it for a while somehow.

My favourite part by far is the transition from the first chorus to the "It's time" bit with that little melody playing, and I've always been very sad that they do not repeat it the second time - it sounds so catchy. It’s a shame.

Apart from that, I would say that this is almost a perfect song, probably album-worthy in my opinion. (I'm not saying which album, because I do not know where it would fit in. Possibly Fundamental, even though I would never want to change that one. Disco 3 maybe if it was even written at that point?)

rathound
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2404 Post by rathound »

its decent enough. Would maybe say a bit PSB-by-numbers musically if I was being harsh

User avatar
Lleonard Pler
Posts: 1518
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2405 Post by Lleonard Pler »

Very cinematic (only natural given its origin), you can imagine a Bruce Weber B&W video for it.

Because of the sophisticated production and arrangements I'd relate it more to an early Fundamental era than late Release track. They really did an awkward division in those FL.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9959
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#2406 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Lleonard Pler wrote: Fri 14 Aug 2026, 9:23 am Very cinematic (only natural given its origin), you can imagine a Bruce Weber B&W video for it.

Because of the sophisticated production and arrangements I'd relate it more to an early Fundamental era than late Release track. They really did an awkward division in those FL.
Yes, it's the b-side to Numb. What was the deal with Chris Zippel? They recorded a few tracks with him during this period.

Post Reply