Posted: Wed 08 Aug 2007, 7:51 pm
Is this the fastest growing thread or what ?
255 replies in 2 days (ok, all for the wrong reasons).
255 replies in 2 days (ok, all for the wrong reasons).
I like to think of it as home...
https://www.petshopboys-forum.com/
Alternative had several tracks that had never previously been released on CD as well as variant mixes of some songs. It's also to be blunt a fantastic collection of tunes and I'm not sure we can say the same of Disco 4. At least they left off the truly embarrassing stuff like Mope and Jerusalem! The missing Blur mix is a bit of glaring in the "pop compilation" category though.shamelessboyuk wrote:Why else would people have bought Alternative went it came out? (there was no exclusives on that release at all!)
I know it's fashionable to pretend fans complain about everything, but it's not true. Fundamental was widely considered a return to form and people seem thrilled with the last few DVDs.Actually wrote:Is this the fastest growing thread or what ?
255 replies in 2 days (ok, all for the wrong reasons).
How can being a fan of an artist come down to "being a loyal customer"? That's crap - we may admire their work but they owe us absolutely nothing. Should I take Disco 2 back to the PSB Superstore because it stinks? Can I get double Tennant Points on my Pet Card for enduring New York City boy? It's (pop)art, darling.dVTB wrote:Being a longtime fan is basically the same as being a loyal customer. You would simply expect a better treatment, that's all.
Because not everyone buys singles (let alone all of them). I, for one, didn't own a single track of Alternative, so it was really well-spent money on that one!shamelessboyuk wrote: Why else would people have bought Alternative went it came out? (there was no exclusives on that release at all!)
But that means not everyone has the remixes on the singles of the other artists either.Hillbilly wrote:Because not everyone buys singles (let alone all of them). I, for one, didn't own a single track of Alternative, so it was really well-spent money on that one!shamelessboyuk wrote: Why else would people have bought Alternative went it came out? (there was no exclusives on that release at all!)
My point was to do with compilations in general - people buy collections of songs for a variety of different reasons, as they will for Disco 4 (or not as the case may be).Hillbilly wrote:Because not everyone buys singles (let alone all of them). I, for one, didn't own a single track of Alternative, so it was really well-spent money on that one!shamelessboyuk wrote: Why else would people have bought Alternative went it came out? (there was no exclusives on that release at all!)
So that's why I wish they would release a follow-up to it; I haven't got every single released after it!
As for Disco 4: I've heard a few of the remixes, but I have no big interest to even hear all of them. It's not a Pet Shop Boys album!
I agree with JSP on this one mate. It's not like buying a loaf of bread and finding it's mouldy - so you rightly take it back and complain. Does their role as the "loyal band" mean they can complain about some of the over the top criticism they've had on here this past few days? What do they do if they don't like it - stop releasing anything?dVTB wrote:I agree with Patrick here (something which I consider absolutely fabulous, by the way). We - music consumers - do have a right to complain. I'm not even speaking about the PSB fandom here. I'm a consumer of a product. If this product doesn't meet my requirements, I can complain or decide not to buy it.
Being a longtime fan is basically the same as being a loyal customer. You would simply expect a better treatment, that's all. But let's not be too dramatic about Disco 4. You can simply choose not to buy it, or wait until it's on sale.