Pet Shop Boys Community

as I read all this, I am trying to work out why the same posters complain about nicknames posts, yet continually trail behind him like a deranged hostile conga line wherever he goes.

glennjridge wrote:as I read all this, I am trying to work out why the same posters complain about nicknames posts, yet continually trail behind him like a deranged hostile conga line wherever he goes.

For precisely the same reason he starts pointless and banal threads. Call it karma.

I don't have a problem with anybody posting crap on here - feel free to celebrate New York City Boy as one of the Twentieth Century's finest compositions if you like but if you are going to start speculative thread upon speculative thread about songs NOBODY* has heard yet, then expect some kind of response. That's free speech, n'est-ce pas?

*apart from Neil, Chris, Trevor Horn, Popjustice, etc

hey, whatever floats your boat.

one two three a cha cha! one two three a cha cha!

glennjridge wrote:hey, whatever floats your boat.

one two three a cha cha! one two three a cha cha!

It does surprise me that a dyed in the wool Bush man like yourself should be defending gross stupidity.

one two three let's all do the nickname

hey,its 11:20 here. isnt zeus's forum due to start a "the other forum 3" or nickname2 thread in the PSB area?

Nickname isn't the only loser who's contributed to this thread

Janet Street-Porter wrote:

nickname wrote:Maybe my posts are ridiculous, but the MOST RIDICULOUS THING I can do is giving up to express my opinion because some people don't like it.

Apart from that, I think PSB (and maybe EMI) like to put the songs in a correct order (according the quality of the songs and other things) and I don't believe it's a bad thing to think why they choose this order.

BUT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ANY OF THE SONGS YET, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!

We know what kind of person you are now, what are you going to do now threaten me in public?.

nickname wrote:

Janet Street-Porter wrote:

nickname wrote:Maybe my posts are ridiculous, but the MOST RIDICULOUS THING I can do is giving up to express my opinion because some people don't like it.

Apart from that, I think PSB (and maybe EMI) like to put the songs in a correct order (according the quality of the songs and other things) and I don't believe it's a bad thing to think why they choose this order.

BUT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ANY OF THE SONGS YET, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!

We know what kind of person you are now, what are you going to do now threaten me in public?.

Mr Janet was simply suggesting what we all know to be the true: it is not possible to have a useful opinion on things that are unknown. Nevertheless, as you yourself mentioned, this is a jolly fun game to keep us all busy in the long cold weeks before F is released.

Keep coming up with the goods, I say!

Ghost within this house wrote:

nickname wrote:

Janet Street-Porter wrote: BUT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ANY OF THE SONGS YET, YOU IMBECILE!!!!!

We know what kind of person you are now, what are you going to do now threaten me in public?.

Mr Janet was simply suggesting what we all know to be the true: it is not possible to have a useful opinion on things that are unknown. Nevertheless, as you yourself mentioned, this is a jolly fun game to keep us all busy in the long cold weeks before F is released.

Keep coming up with the goods, I say!

I think the same about her (and about you) if you ask me, but I think the community hasn't been created to insult other people (I see some of you don't agree with that).

westendboy87 wrote:Why can't everyone just respect what everyone else has to say? He did nothing wrong. If you don't like nickname's posts, don't read them. The poor guy (or girl) got attacked by all these people at once. I'd be pretty upset if I were him

Thank you westendboy87, I love this sentence:

"If you don't like nickname's posts, don't read them"

It sounds easy, you don't need to read my post if you don't like them. But for some people is IMPOSSIBLE. They are not able to do that although it is as easy as it sounds.

Yes, I feel really upset. I don't know what kind of things try to achieve with their insults.

nickname wrote:
It sounds easy, you don't need to read my post if you don't like them. But for some people is IMPOSSIBLE.

I'm sorry you're upset, but being upset doesn't seem to have dampened your ardour for endless speculation. Let's try and find a middle way: it would be great if people who didn't want to read your posts could simply avoid them. However, at the moment, that would only be possible by not opening ANY threads, and therefore by NOT VISITING the forum at all!!

If you could try to be more selective, or focus all your speculations into a smaller number of threads, then I think (a) you could continue speculating uninterrupted and (b) you would receive less abuse.

nickname perhaps make the your thread titles clearer so we don't have to open them up.

because titles like "The question is....." implies you want as many people (friends or enemies) to read it.

Just keep things simple and maybe all in one special nickname thread.

I don't think people are out to get you, its just you need to relax a bit and think before you post.

hey, it's a free world after all - we have the freedom of speech
respect each other
if nickname makes threads that you don't like; don't read them.
it's so easy to blame... look at yourself first, think twice, and so on...

Aren't we getting a bit off topic?

Can we talk about track 8 again? After all it should be even better than track 5 on Introspective.

ArseSpanker wrote:Aren't we getting a bit off topic?

Can we talk about track 8 again? After all it should be even better than track 5 on Introspective.

But hey!, Look at Track 5 on Actually, Do you think track 8 will be better than that one?