Posted: Mon 01 May 2006, 10:35 am
The intrusive r is what bothers me... CasanovaR
Must be deliberate, I've never noticed Neil talking like that before.
Must be deliberate, I've never noticed Neil talking like that before.
I like to think of it as home...
https://www.petshopboys-forum.com/
I think it´s e-mail...Darkstar wrote:"e" word? what? ERECTION??????![]()
![]()
Indeed when I first heard it I was like "dream of rape?! what kinda of weirdo is this Casanova!"Kirk Mack wrote:I don't have a problem with "erection" in the song- it is referred to in a number of songs in today's age, though in other words...
...I'm more put off by "rape" than "erection"......partially because Neil uses a rhyming dictionary too much in that song.....but mostly because of "rape"....
yep, it's really doing it for me tooBlueSwan wrote:Casanova In Hell is my favourite track on Fundamental. I love every bit of it, including the "e"-word.
hehe..i'm a 23 year old prude who feels the same way. but i actually don't like the song to start with...so the lyrics only put the cherry on top.CroMagnon wrote:I adore Fundamental; it's beautiful. But Casanovia in Hell is torturing me. I want to love it. I love the melody, the music, the arrangement. But I just can't get over the fact that the word "erection" is in there. An alarm rings in my head that says "no, no, that word should not be in a pop song, let alone a beautiful ballad like this!". (I almost wrote that it "sticks out like a sore thumb" there . . .)
Surely, Neil could have found another way to write it? Throughout the album he uses politiical contexts without actually spelling it out, and yet he can't do the same for male erectile dysfunction?
Am I alone here, an old (30-ish) prude who should just get over it?
BlueSwan wrote:Casanova In Hell is my favourite track on Fundamental. I love every bit of it, including the "e"-word.