Pet Shop Boys Community

DJ Danny C wrote:

Wrong.

Why don't you?

You're confusing me. Where do the scientists who you believe, get their wages from?

Less land. Not a problem for you maybe, but then, you are unbelievably dense.

Why would the amount of land that your graph showed us, be a problem?

Wrong.

So you atleast agree that not all the ice will melt, or that they'll still be alot of freezing water around?

Government doesn't say that

We dont have "green" tax?

There are no bad people.

So its ok then for people not to bother with your campaign, its not a problem

Face it Danny, if what you and your government sponsered scientist friends were saying was intensely important, none of us would need asking.


Great cartoon homer

Thanks.

alig wrote:

raggatwin wrote:

alig wrote: Still not done with your commie rants? Yes, profit is so evil. How dare they! You will never learn.

For the third time, i think. I AM NOT A COMMUNIST! I said that this borgeois liberal democracy, although not perfect is the best system we could have. I am not against the making of profit BUT i am against the making of obscene profit. I am against the likes of Tesco making a billion quid in profit but still wanting to shaft both their rank and file staff and their suppliers. I am against scum like Rupert Murdoch who offshores his accounts so that he pays virtually no tax in this country yet makes huge profits.

yes, you are a communist in denial. there is no such thing as obscene profit. how do you define that? that people investing in business with their hard-earned money shouldn't be getting their share? one year, you make "obscene profit" in order to offset the "oscene deficit" the next year. people must be layed off in order to be competitive. of course state-run businesses don't dare lay people off and that's why they all run on huge deficits.
moan all you want about murdoch but he created plenty of businesses and employments and wages for thousands of people. he laid his fortune on the line to start his own company and this is quite admirable. I bet lots of city councils are glad about the tax his companies bring them.

Murdoch is a tax cheat and a hypocrite. Have you never read The Sun or News of the World, watched Sky News?

Trying to avoid the use of sexual expletives....Oh, actually it's not too hard after all. That must be my maturity shining through

What expletives?

DJ Danny C wrote: You heard it here first folks. Climate change is a myth because the media are hyping up the wrong aspects of it.

Climate change is not a myth. Just spend 30 secs looking at any temperature graph on the net and you'll see we're all doomed. However, it is correct that the media are hyping up the wrong aspects of it.

Well done.

homer1972 wrote:
What expletives?

DJ Danny called Pet Shop Boys a ****ing ****. It's since been censored.

[Two sexual expletives now removed to save the weak hearted]

Surprise surprise.

Thanks James.

Work out your Carbon Footprint and plant a tree for only £12 plus postage!


http://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.html

james23_uk wrote:DJ Danny called Pet Shop Boys a ****ing ****. It's since been censored.

Yeah, it seems I can't get away with calling a spade a spade, but you can spout off any amount of retarded bullcrap about global warming, and that's okay. Truly the inmates have taken over the asylum.

Thank christ the real world isn't like that, and I can verbally abuse people who offend my intelligence to my heart's content without being nannied. I mean, hell, never mind swearing, it should be legal for me to shoot people like him, just to save the world from his stupidity.

Anyway, the best I can do is to place him on my ignore list, and I'd suggest anyone with an IQ in double figures or higher does the same. We might (sadly) not be able to deny these imbeciles a forum for their criminal opinions, but we can at least try to shut them out.

people like danny suffer from the "consider the source syndrome".

its the same syndrome that sinks the Al Gores and michael Moores.

take Moore for instance. blockbuster movie sales....a success by all means of getting his word out there on whatever topic he chooses,for now lets say Iraq,Goerge Bush,he said his sole goal was to block his re-election.Fahrenheit did HUGE busines.

but if you notice, he doesnt get results despite all the publicity on his core issues.

its because people are willing to listen to the message but if its delivered by a unattractive personality people will tune out.

they can have stats by scientists but its not enough.we've been around the block with these constant "scenarios". GW will only be taken seriously when the followers who carry the message dont seem like the most insufferable people you could ever come across.

glennjridge wrote:GW will only be taken seriously when the followers who carry the message dont seem like the most insufferable people you could ever come across.

Thank you glenn, I agree totally on this point.

glennjridge wrote:GW will only be taken seriously when the followers who carry the message dont seem like the most insufferable people you could ever come across.

I need a new irony meter - mine just exploded.

And so far as sources are concerned, I don't know how you can tell someone's personality from a scientific paper or journal. Or have you just been listening to the wrong people again?

thats the problem I see. the scientists dont appear to be the noisemakers. its a very vocal and loud minority of jackasses in the media and entertainment.

I already gave you the stats from scientists themselves about the yawn inducing supposedly devastating....timeline of the melting ice.

while the blowhard types in entertainment are scaring everyone with notions of continants dropping into the sea the scientists themselves and even from the IPPC simply post quiet stats about a sea level rise between 7 inches 2 feet by 2100.

this is indicative of a problem I see with GW.the followers sem to be doing the scaring not the scientists.