Which song of them was a top ten hit list in USA?technotrancemix wrote:DM never fail to miss a top5 hit with the new single from the previous couple of albums. PSB struggle to make top20! DM are much much much much bigger than PSB in just about every country. DM still get top10 hits in the USA, PSB haven't since 1987.
what if they got popular again?
- Dreamcatcher2003
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Wed 17 Dec 2003, 6:45 pm
- Contact:
The CELL by Stephen King instantly hit number 1 in New York Times Bookseller Lists selling well over 200 thousand copies in three weeks. This affirms my opinion: People really need an occassional good horror read...
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
-
Alcibiades
Regarding the Depeche Mode - PSB argument:
As a fan of both groups I'd say that PSB generally have a stronger mainstream/commercial appeal than DM (and I don't mean it in a negative way). DM have more of an alternative/goth image (especially since "Black Celebration") and by the early 90s they have worked with producers/engineers like Flood (U2) or Butch Vig (Nirvana), whereas PSB have always kept their pop, dance-friendly identity.
This resulted in DM getting recognised as a more 'serious' band. It's characteristic that in most record stores here I find Depeche Mode in the 'New Rock/New Wave' stack somewhere after the Cure and before Devo, whilst PSB are usually in the pop/hits section somewhere after Madonna and before Take That.
And now that actually both bands are past their prime commercially speaking, I find that from my experience DM have a more 'loyal' fanbase than PSB and their new albums make a more serious impact in the press (i.e. you 'll see them on quite a few covers of music magazines after each new album), whereas PSB have unfortunately almost drifted into a 'past' thing.
Imo, I find that PSB's sense of melody is stronger, effortless and more straightforward compared to DM's dependence on atmospheric soundscapes, however DM are usually more eclectic in what they release.
To answer the original question I wouldn't judge the Boys success according to their popularity. On the contrary and as 'Release' showed (regardless if it was not up to their best abilities) it seems that by today they don't have much anxiety regarding their charts performance and would do what they felt like which is always a good thing for a band.
As a fan of both groups I'd say that PSB generally have a stronger mainstream/commercial appeal than DM (and I don't mean it in a negative way). DM have more of an alternative/goth image (especially since "Black Celebration") and by the early 90s they have worked with producers/engineers like Flood (U2) or Butch Vig (Nirvana), whereas PSB have always kept their pop, dance-friendly identity.
This resulted in DM getting recognised as a more 'serious' band. It's characteristic that in most record stores here I find Depeche Mode in the 'New Rock/New Wave' stack somewhere after the Cure and before Devo, whilst PSB are usually in the pop/hits section somewhere after Madonna and before Take That.
And now that actually both bands are past their prime commercially speaking, I find that from my experience DM have a more 'loyal' fanbase than PSB and their new albums make a more serious impact in the press (i.e. you 'll see them on quite a few covers of music magazines after each new album), whereas PSB have unfortunately almost drifted into a 'past' thing.
Imo, I find that PSB's sense of melody is stronger, effortless and more straightforward compared to DM's dependence on atmospheric soundscapes, however DM are usually more eclectic in what they release.
To answer the original question I wouldn't judge the Boys success according to their popularity. On the contrary and as 'Release' showed (regardless if it was not up to their best abilities) it seems that by today they don't have much anxiety regarding their charts performance and would do what they felt like which is always a good thing for a band.
-
Technotrancemix
- Glenny4
- Posts: 9798
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 6:12 pm
- Contact:
what if they got popular again?
Does not take much really.
They could have got back a bit in 99 but they had to release camp New York city boy and boring I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more if they had released FYOG first then CTH then maybe Drunk things could have been far different.
I love Bilingual but i can easy understand why the general public would think what the hell all this about and for Release well i think we all know where they went wrong there.
And it was crazy not to release anything of Disco 3 If Looks Could Kill should have been 007 theme it's perfect for it in everyway.
Does not take much really.
They could have got back a bit in 99 but they had to release camp New York city boy and boring I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more if they had released FYOG first then CTH then maybe Drunk things could have been far different.
I love Bilingual but i can easy understand why the general public would think what the hell all this about and for Release well i think we all know where they went wrong there.
And it was crazy not to release anything of Disco 3 If Looks Could Kill should have been 007 theme it's perfect for it in everyway.
- Kiran
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri 02 Apr 2004, 1:42 pm
I don't think it's that simple. I don't find I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more boring and prefer it to FYOG. The problem with being a fan of the PSBs is that we hear a song and think "That's great, it should be a big hit". Other people hear it and think "yawn, PSBs again". Unfortunately it is "other people" who buy most records.Glenny4 wrote:
Does not take much really.
They could have got back a bit in 99 but they had to release camp New York city boy and boring I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more if they had released FYOG first then CTH then maybe Drunk things could have been far different.
I rule. You don't.
- Glenny4
- Posts: 9798
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 6:12 pm
- Contact:
I did say only a bit in 99Kiran wrote:I don't think it's that simple. I don't find I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more boring and prefer it to FYOG. The problem with being a fan of the PSBs is that we hear a song and think "That's great, it should be a big hit". Other people hear it and think "yawn, PSBs again". Unfortunately it is "other people" who buy most records.Glenny4 wrote:
Does not take much really.
They could have got back a bit in 99 but they had to release camp New York city boy and boring I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more if they had released FYOG first then CTH then maybe Drunk things could have been far different.
Can you imagine how boring I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more would have been if psb would have been like just them with a boring Before video
- Kiran
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri 02 Apr 2004, 1:42 pm
I can't even remember the Before video so it must have been pretty boring! I don't really like Before very much so a boring video would be pretty fitting for it.Glenny4 wrote:Can you imagine how boring I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more would have been if psb would have been like just them with a boring Before video
I rule. You don't.
- Glenny4
- Posts: 9798
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 6:12 pm
- Contact:
Kiran wrote:I can't even remember the Before video so it must have been pretty boring! I don't really like Before very much so a boring video would be pretty fitting for it.Glenny4 wrote:Can you imagine how boring I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more would have been if psb would have been like just them with a boring Before video
Even worse, try imagine the Home & Dry video being the I don't know what you want but I can't give it any more video
- gareth
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:19 pm
- Contact:
- AlfonsoPSB
- Posts: 2211
- Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 11:47 pm
- Glenny4
- Posts: 9798
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 6:12 pm
- Contact:
-
Sjòn
Alcibiades wrote:Regarding the Depeche Mode - PSB argument:
As a fan of both groups I'd say that PSB generally have a stronger mainstream/commercial appeal than DM (and I don't mean it in a negative way). DM have more of an alternative/goth image (especially since "Black Celebration") and by the early 90s they have worked with producers/engineers like Flood (U2) or Butch Vig (Nirvana), whereas PSB have always kept their pop, dance-friendly identity.
This resulted in DM getting recognised as a more 'serious' band. It's characteristic that in most record stores here I find Depeche Mode in the 'New Rock/New Wave' stack somewhere after the Cure and before Devo, whilst PSB are usually in the pop/hits section somewhere after Madonna and before Take That.
And now that actually both bands are past their prime commercially speaking, I find that from my experience DM have a more 'loyal' fanbase than PSB and their new albums make a more serious impact in the press (i.e. you 'll see them on quite a few covers of music magazines after each new album), whereas PSB have unfortunately almost drifted into a 'past' thing.
Imo, I find that PSB's sense of melody is stronger, effortless and more straightforward compared to DM's dependence on atmospheric soundscapes, however DM are usually more eclectic in what they release.
To answer the original question I wouldn't judge the Boys success according to their popularity. On the contrary and as 'Release' showed (regardless if it was not up to their best abilities) it seems that by today they don't have much anxiety regarding their charts performance and would do what they felt like which is always a good thing for a band.
I couldn't agree more.
- gareth
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:19 pm
- Contact:
- Kiran
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri 02 Apr 2004, 1:42 pm