MPs expenses

For 'Off Topic' and non-PSB music threads.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Dipso
Posts: 3552
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:39 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#46 Post by Dipso »

It is hilarious how so many of these MPs claim to have made "honest mistakes" with their accounting. Who doesn't know when their mortgage has finished, for God's sake?
Prick up your ears.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MPs expenses

#47 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Dipso wrote:It is hilarious how so many of these MPs claim to have made "honest mistakes" with their accounting. Who doesn't know when their mortgage has finished, for God's sake?
Somebody's who's crooked and/or incompetent.

User avatar
PlayBeyond
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 5:27 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#48 Post by PlayBeyond »

Michael Martin is on borrowed time, out of all these expenses revalations what he has done is absolutely diabolical. He is the most corrupt out of all of them.

if only this woman was prime minister again everything would be alright :cry:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQ-M0KEFm9I
'How do we deal with the fall-out of the age we used to call space?'
Image

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MPs expenses

#49 Post by Patrick Bateman »

PlayBeyond wrote:if only this woman was prime minister again everything would be alright :cry:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQ-M0KEFm9I
Are you f*cking insane?

User avatar
StevePSB
Site Admin
Posts: 4953
Joined: Wed 08 Jan 2003, 2:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: MPs expenses

#50 Post by StevePSB »

No, he's just just very young and very uninformed.

I don't think there's anyone on earth I'd wish dead, with the exception of that evil witch.


StevePSB

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#51 Post by Undertaker »

That would be dead funny if she came back, along with Major shagging the egg women. It might get us a new series of Spitting Image. Infact, the puppets would do a better job than those morons.

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#52 Post by Undertaker »

Dipso wrote:It is hilarious how so many of these MPs claim to have made "honest mistakes" with their accounting. Who doesn't know when their mortgage has finished, for God's sake?
It didn't even start, did it? Wasn't it the Scunthorpe MP who claimed back a mortgage he never had? Surely thats fraud.

The Grimsby MP, Austin Mitchell, claimed for a jar of pickles and a packet of biscuits :lol: We can let him off with that, i reckon. He's actually a very good MP. A rare breed.

Lets see how many repay what they have taken.

User avatar
PlayBeyond
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 5:27 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#53 Post by PlayBeyond »

StevePSB wrote:No, he's just just very young and very uninformed.




StevePSB
thats a bit condescending but ill let it slide, im allowed my own opinion
'How do we deal with the fall-out of the age we used to call space?'
Image

User avatar
StevePSB
Site Admin
Posts: 4953
Joined: Wed 08 Jan 2003, 2:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: MPs expenses

#54 Post by StevePSB »

Fair enough, but you can't say you were old enough at any point in Thatcher's reign to properly know what was going on. You weren't born at the time of the miners strike, were no doubt still in nappies in the time of the Poll tax, and were two years old when she was forced out, so I can't get my head around the posting of a video as some kind of answer to our problems that you can't actually relate to because of your age.

If you were rich under her reign you were perfectly happy - everyone else got trampled on, everyone else were treated like something you'd scrape off your shoe. I shudder to think of the prospect of another Tory government, and although Labour have had their failings I'd hate to think the general public are stupid enough to vote them out because of a worldwide recession that was totally out of their control, although I suspect it may well happen. God help us if it does.


StevePSB

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MPs expenses

#55 Post by Patrick Bateman »

In the first year after he was elected, Mr Malik set about furnishing and refurbishing his London flat, claiming £21,634 in allowances while having modest mortgage interest repayments of £347.50 per month. Some of his expenses claims brought him into conflict with the fees office.

He submitted a bill for £2,100 for a Sony 40in flatscreen TV, only to be told that the maximum allowable claim for televisions was £750. He told the fees office that he was “very upset” at their stance, saying that no one had told him there was a limit on what he could spend. Internal emails between officials in the fees office show that civil servants were taken aback.

“I do not remember him asking if there were limits on a television, just if he could purchase one,” wrote one. “He did not say he was purchasing a £2,100 TV, let alone a 40in plasma one.” A more senior official agreed that “£2,100 for a television is luxurious by anyone’s standards”.

Mr Malik pursued the matter and wrote a letter in March 2006 in which he stated that because no one had told him there was a limit on what he could spend, “from a natural justice perspective I feel a justifiable exception would be the fairest manner to deal with the current situation”.

The fees office refused to reimburse him in full but eventually agreed to give him £1,050: half the cost of the plasma TV, together with £250 for a home cinema system which had cost him £500. His total spending on furnishings in 2005-6 was £6,147, including £240 for wardrobes, £240 for hi-fi speakers and £239 for a dishwasher. In 2006-7 another £1,521 was claimed for furnishings and fittings, including a £671 fireplace, then in 2007-8 Mr Malik spent another £6,274 on household items, including £1,420 for a bathroom, £730 for a massage chair and £510 for a fitted wardrobe.
:lol:

In honour of Malik, I shall be asking girls if they will sleep with me from a natural justice perspective.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... enses.html

User avatar
Fugitive1979
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue 31 Oct 2006, 11:05 pm
Contact:

Re: MPs expenses

#56 Post by Fugitive1979 »

StevePSB wrote:If you were rich under her reign you were perfectly happy - everyone else got trampled on, everyone else were treated like something you'd scrape off your shoe. I shudder to think of the prospect of another Tory government, and although Labour have had their failings I'd hate to think the general public are stupid enough to vote them out because of a worldwide recession that was totally out of their control, although I suspect it may well happen. God help us if it does.


StevePSB
Labour will be gone this time next year. Not because of a worldwide recession, but because they are a useless bunch of lying, back-peddling scoundrels.

However, some might be stupid enough to vote them in again. God help us if that happens.
:| :o

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9956
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MPs expenses

#57 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Fugitive1979 wrote:Labour will be gone this time next year. Not because of a worldwide recession, but because they are a useless bunch of lying, back-peddling scoundrels.

However, some might be stupid enough to vote them in again. God help us if that happens.
Nope, they're history. Down to 22% in the latest Daily Prole opinion poll which should see most of them wiped out.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... 430063.ece

Dipso
Posts: 3552
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:39 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#58 Post by Dipso »

Fugitive1979 wrote: Labour will be gone this time next year. Not because of a worldwide recession, but because they are a useless bunch of lying, back-peddling scoundrels.

However, some might be stupid enough to vote them in again. God help us if that happens.
I fail to see how life will be any better with David Cameron as Prime Minister. The last Tory government was as mired in sleaze as the current one is.
Prick up your ears.

User avatar
StevePSB
Site Admin
Posts: 4953
Joined: Wed 08 Jan 2003, 2:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: MPs expenses

#59 Post by StevePSB »

Dipso wrote:I fail to see how life will be any better with David Cameron as Prime Minister. The last Tory government was as mired in sleaze as the current one is.
It won't - it'll be worse, but people will be blinded by current issues and not realise the problems they're going to cause for themselves and everyone else who isn't well to do in the process of letting the Tories back in. Those on the minimum wage will really suffer when the Tories show their true colours and scrap it, the NHS is bound to suffer and perceived anti-toff laws like the fox hunting ban will be overturned, no doubt amongst countless other changes and cuts that will hit the common man hard. Welcome back to Britain under a Tory government. I feel sick just thinking about it. :(


StevePSB

User avatar
redsock
Posts: 2393
Joined: Sat 08 Feb 2003, 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: MPs expenses

#60 Post by redsock »

Dipso wrote:
Fugitive1979 wrote: Labour will be gone this time next year. Not because of a worldwide recession, but because they are a useless bunch of lying, back-peddling scoundrels.

However, some might be stupid enough to vote them in again. God help us if that happens.
I fail to see how life will be any better with David Cameron as Prime Minister. The last Tory government was as mired in sleaze as the current one is.
The main point is, although the Tories could be just as bad, if labour do get voted to serve another term, they will take it as a vote of confidence from the people and assume that we have given them permission to carry on with the cack handed way they have run this country into the ground. :evil:

We MUST have a new government (no matter who they are) to at least give the people of this country some sense of actually being in control of something, no matter what little difference it will make in the long run.

Oh, and can someone note the date I type this, I predict the UKIP and possibly even BNP getting seats either in the UK or European Parliament in the near future, if this rumbles on for much longer and nothing of substance is done about it ......

Post Reply