Page 4 of 10
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 3:44 pm
by Sandy Shaw
DopeFiend wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 11:31 am
Sandy Shaw wrote: Sun 26 Oct 2025, 3:19 pm
Where's the info from that it's a $30,000,000 claim?

from the March document.
Thanks!
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 5:21 pm
by TallThinMan
symco wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 3:30 pm
They do do alot of cover versions I'm surprised others haven't followed

is there money to be made when you haven't written it yourself?
They added a middle section to ‘Go West’ and accordingly have a co-write credit.
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 6:43 pm
by g_m
leesmapman wrote: Sun 26 Oct 2025, 11:29 pm
Or maybe Willis doesn't like that it is changed to 6/8 instead of 4/4.
To be fair he's not the only one
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 9:39 pm
by PSBForTheMasses
Sandy Shaw wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 3:44 pm
DopeFiend wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 11:31 am
Sandy Shaw wrote: Sun 26 Oct 2025, 3:19 pm
Where's the info from that it's a $30,000,000 claim?

from the March document.
Thanks!
So if they lose the case, will they go bankrupt?
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 11:56 pm
by jasonjohn
would Go West work without the video?
I remember spinning up Very for the first time. Probably my first CD that I actually bought and wanted. It was magical, but I also remember thinking it was quite streamlined in production, compared to the textures of Discography, At first listen I didn't really understand their angle on Go West, even though everything was marvellously fresh.
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 1:58 am
by markus
jasonjohn wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 11:56 pm
would Go West work without the video?
I remember spinning up Very for the first time. Probably my first CD that I actually bought and wanted. It was magical, but I also remember thinking it was quite streamlined in production, compared to the textures of Discography, At first listen I didn't really understand their angle on Go West, even though everything was marvellously fresh.
I believe Psb withhold the idea Go West is about gay utopia. At least their version of the song is, thus the closing number on Very.
Victor Willis threatened to sue everyone claiming the are gay references in his songs, after many years of appropriating gay culture and making millions of Village People. He's suddenly gone into blackmailing. First he filed a lawsuit against the current line up of Village People for using his picture illegally. Then he went after Donald Trump for using YMCA without his permission. Then after a sudden change of heart - he was on stage performing YMCA for Donald Trump together with the band.
Does this seem like a guy fit to be in a position to dictate rules for Neil Tennant of what to say or do? Like he's going to be undefeatable in court. Should they
delete Go West from their catalogue instead of taking up the fight with Willis?
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 2:16 am
by jasonjohn
Willis is in denial if he can't see his own official video for Go West has more gay pelvic gyrations per minute than Neil & Chris' version
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wc-AQJ2MYo
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 2:44 am
by petshopgrrl
PSBForTheMasses wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 9:39 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 3:44 pm
DopeFiend wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 11:31 am

from the March document.
Thanks!
So if they lose the case, will they go bankrupt?
Probably not, but the Dreamworld Tour may have to continue into 2032.
For anyone who wants to read Karen Willis' original filing, from whence these demands were clipped, click ye here:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 07.1.0.pdf
Could all of this have been avoided if Neil had simply picked up the phone?? Did we learn nothing from the Drake situation? (Hopefully PSB invested those rewards carefully!)
ETA: Full timeline of the case is here:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/cas ... nant_et_al
Unfortunately I don't have access to the PDFs - any paralegals out there in the Community?
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 8:13 am
by Spittingcat
Should they delete Go West from their catalogue instead of taking up the fight with Willis?
They can just stop playing it live, and leave it off any future compilations. They have more than an enough alternative songs to include.
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 9:19 am
by jyllinge
petshopgrrl wrote: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 2:44 am
PSBForTheMasses wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 9:39 pm
Sandy Shaw wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 3:44 pm
Thanks!
So if they lose the case, will they go bankrupt?
Probably not, but the Dreamworld Tour may have to continue into 2032.
For anyone who wants to read Karen Willis' original filing, from whence these demands were clipped, click ye here:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 07.1.0.pdf
Could all of this have been avoided if Neil had simply picked up the phone?? Did we learn nothing from the Drake situation? (Hopefully PSB invested those rewards carefully!)
ETA: Full timeline of the case is here:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/cas ... nant_et_al
Unfortunately I don't have access to the PDFs - any paralegals out there in the Community?
I dont know how it works in detail but it seams that Warner Music Group is responsible for obtaining
authorization to use music for the Pet Shop Boys (or the movie Company for the Blue-ray). So it would not be PSB to pay for in worst case, in my humble view, its not them doing all the legal work etc. and Warner takes good money for this service as well. Its of course a reputational damage...Probably more to Willis for being dramatic over nothing.
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 9:24 am
by jyllinge
jyllinge wrote: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 9:19 am
petshopgrrl wrote: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 2:44 am
PSBForTheMasses wrote: Mon 27 Oct 2025, 9:39 pm
So if they lose the case, will they go bankrupt?
Probably not, but the Dreamworld Tour may have to continue into 2032.
For anyone who wants to read Karen Willis' original filing, from whence these demands were clipped, click ye here:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 07.1.0.pdf
Could all of this have been avoided if Neil had simply picked up the phone?? Did we learn nothing from the Drake situation? (Hopefully PSB invested those rewards carefully!)
ETA: Full timeline of the case is here:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/cas ... nant_et_al
Unfortunately I don't have access to the PDFs - any paralegals out there in the Community?
I dont know how it works in detail but it seams that Warner Music Group is responsible for obtaining
authorization to use music for the Pet Shop Boys (or the movie Company for the Blue-ray). So it would not be PSB to pay for in worst case, in my humble view, its not them doing all the legal work etc. and Warner takes good money for this service as well. Its of course a reputational damage...Probably more to Willis for being dramatic over nothing.
P.S Going after PSB on a personal level could in fact trigger a counter suit - on a much higher amount! Willis is taking a big risk in my view. If PSB wins counter suit - then willis have to pay for the delay, loss of income, reputational and emotional distress etc etc. + 100 million?
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 2:59 pm
by PSBForTheMasses
A slightly off-topic but interesting reading. As far as I see, PSB owns the song culturally.
https://off-the-records.com/go-west-pet-shop-boys/
"The original plan was ‘Fool On The Hill’, but Lowe decided he’d rather do ‘Go West’ by The Village People. Neil Tennant was against it as he HATED The Village People and he’d never even heard ‘Go West’, which wasn’t one of the band’s bigger hits."

Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 3:07 pm
by PSBForTheMasses
-----DOUBLE POST
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 3:24 pm
by markus
Spittingcat wrote: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 8:13 am
Should they delete Go West from their catalogue instead of taking up the fight with Willis?
They can just stop playing it live, and leave it off any future compilations. They have more than an enough alternative songs to include.
Why would they do that? It's not even Putin owning them by the balls here, just a mentally instable showbiz freak who's had no success using extortion on anyone else. Only prevented Psb from playing one of their biggest hits and crowd pleasers. Why should they kneel infront of him?
Re: Go West Dreamworld dispute
Posted: Tue 28 Oct 2025, 3:59 pm
by popfreak
As it been mentioned what the estate of Jacques Morali have to say about this lawsuit being as they own half of the song writing credit or did Willis buy them out?