Pet Shop Boys Community

Syncratic wrote:
Because I'm a c*** ? Is that what you were hoping?

No. Not really.

Syncratic wrote:
What I was pointing out is that for what ever motivation, (and I know the mad american hag has already addressed this) its' not difficult to combine two reviews and add own personal opinion. For what it's worth it seems that Dazzer's connections are closer, from the new information received and confirmed from the official site so I'm more likely to respond to this but this is now immaterial as we all know who it is. Make of that what you will.

See, that wasn't so difficult. That is a fair enough response. It certainly should not have been confusing. It was almost like communicating. See, it can be done on this board at times. Sometimes, ya just do not have to be so syncratic, Sarcastic. Make of that what ya will. I will devoid the usage of an emoticon for senseless effect. It may confuse things further.

you ever notice in the movies or in real life there will be a survival situation like the Poseidon adventure or the towering inferno where there will be a bunch of people trapped together just trying to survive, and make it thru a horrible situation, and there just ALWAYS happens to be that 1 guy in the group that just totally cracks up and loses it and is a hothead that starts shouting and puts everyone else on edge and ends up getting other people killed?

that would be syncratic.

I'm sorry you found my post confusing. I'll make a big effort to take you seriously in future. Now off you go now...there's a good boy...

glennjridge wrote:you ever notice in the movies or in real life there will be a survival situation like the Poseidon adventure or the towering inferno where there will be a bunch of people trapped together just trying to survive, and make it thru a horrible situation, and there just ALWAYS happens to be that 1 guy in the group that just totally cracks up and loses it and is a hothead that starts shouting and puts everyone else on edge and ends up getting other people killed?

that would be the daft american hag.

You took the words right out of my mouth. Now please stop stalking me.

forget me,I'd rather you use all that nerdy energy to make a big effort to make your posts less confusing.

This coming from king of nerdy posts?

Do you actually want to address the topic in this thread or keep hanging yourself?

Syncratic wrote:I'm sorry you found my post confusing. I'll make a big effort to take you seriously in future. Now off you go now...there's a good boy...

Sarcastic, I was referring to you using a confused emoticon during a post in which you posted to me. So, either my post confused you initially, or you confused yourself, after you wrote your response. Either way, I was not the one confused. Seems as though you are still confused, over a very non-confusing situation. Now...off you go....no...not that way....no....not that way either, Sarcastic. The other way....no, no, your other other way. There ya go. You'll get it eventually. In future, always remember to take baby steps, Sarcastic. Baby steps.

Syncratic wrote:This coming from king of nerdy posts?

Do you actually want to address the topic in this thread or keep hanging yourself?

if you are going to insult me. insult me.dont plagerise my insults and send them back.

"I am thinking this boat is not so good....."

Ok back up a cotton pickin moment! Whoah there! Firstly, you take emoticons THAT seriously? Firstly I probably forgot using it, and if I did I'm sure it wasn't intended to flag up anything you said but what I'd heard about this mystery first poster. Still with me? Right! So you've obviously confused my original intentions. (Oh do try to keep up with me!) The record does show that contrary to what you have been babbling on about it is YOU who have misinterpreted ME.

Now it seems that you want to go round and round in circles all day over this just to try and establish a little credibility. Don't let me stop you. I'm sure a dog will eventually catch its own tail.

Oh and before I forget, whether or not I was originally being sarcastic (something to which you're not adverse to) you are the one who has had to revert to petty personal insults. If you really want to nickname me, Sarcastic, I'm sure I can find one for you. How about Dumbass or Numbskull? Blockhead perhaps?

You'd better go now, your diaper needs changing.

Janet Street-Porter wrote:

"I am thinking this boat is not so good....."

It's been hi-jacked.

glennjridge wrote:

Syncratic wrote:This coming from king of nerdy posts?

Do you actually want to address the topic in this thread or keep hanging yourself?

if you are going to insult me. insult me.dont plagerise my insults and send them back.

Ok, well while I'm waiting for blockhead's response I'll insult you. GLENNJRIDGE!!

Syncratic wrote:Ok back up a cotton pickin moment! Whoah there! Firstly, you take emoticons THAT seriously? Firstly I probably forgot using it, and if I did I'm sure it wasn't intended to flag up anything you said but what I'd heard about this mystery first poster. Still with me? Right! So you've obviously confused my original intentions. (Oh do try to keep up with me!) The record does show that contrary to what you have been babbling on about it is YOU who have misinterpreted ME.

Now it seems that you want to go round and round in circles all day over this just to try and establish a little credibility. Don't let me stop you. I'm sure a dog will eventually catch its own tail.

Oh and before I forget, whether or not I was originally being sarcastic (something to which you're not adverse to) you are the one who has had to revert to petty personal insults. If you really want to nickname me, Sarcastic, I'm sure I can find one for you. How about Dumbass or Numbskull? Blockhead perhaps?

You'd better go now, your diaper needs changing.

Oh lord. *Smile* I got as far as the little "Keep up with me" part up top, and then I just decided not to read the rest, for it was obviously going to go well beyond ridiculous lengths, and seeing how it ended, while I am typing, I am glad I didn't waste my time. I suggest you seriously re-read what you posted, Sarcastic. Now, if this is how you go about things in real life scenario's, then my god, you must be very alone. Good chatting with ya, but it is obvious that you are well above my intellectual level, thus I must concede absolute defeat. Violin avatar and all. I have known you, for about 15 minutes, and I honestly believe that you will actually take what I said in regard to your intellect being higher than mine, at face value. Congrats. You have officially achieved greatness.

Syncratic wrote:

glennjridge wrote:

Syncratic wrote:This coming from king of nerdy posts?

Do you actually want to address the topic in this thread or keep hanging yourself?

if you are going to insult me. insult me.dont plagerise my insults and send them back.

Ok, well while I'm waiting for blockhead's response I'll insult you. GLENNJRIDGE!!

*Smile* Just the fact that you have made a simple comment in regard to your initial post I responded to, into what this has become, clearly demonstrates quite a lot about you Sarcastic. The usage of blockhead is brilliant. Please make sure you always refer to me as blockhead. Do you even know what it is you are arguing about? Feel free to call this whatever you wish if you feel this isn't an argument, cuz christ only knows what the hell it really is, but hey this is your game, so call it what ya wish! *Tag* You are it. *Hides*

Edited to relfect Blockhead's second reply in succession. You may continue to refer to me as Sarcastic, if you feel it aids your tired logic.

If you'd have accepted my first reply in the spirit it was given (which actually didn't need a response) then maybe you could have avoided feeling you had something to prove by instigating childish, 'sarcastic' insults.

You're certainly a tit for tat kind of person. I wish I could say it's been a pleasure, but that is a kind of compliment I'm sure you wouldn't be used to. (sigh)

Feel free to continue your clueless charade.