Page 5 of 6
Posted: Thu 04 May 2006, 6:15 pm
by Kirk Mack
Lush wrote:Kirk Mack wrote:I don't have a problem with "erection" in the song- it is referred to in a number of songs in today's age, though in other words...
...I'm more put off by "rape" than "erection"......
Initially, I felt the same way, but I think Neil quite cleverly uses the rape fantasy to show how utterly sad and pitiful Casanova has become; I have to say though that I have only listened to the song a couple of times, so I may be wrong.
I see your point, it just caught me off guard. I haven't listened to it all that much, so it may become benign eventually....
Posted: Thu 04 May 2006, 7:40 pm
by Eldritch
Technotrancemix wrote:Eldritch wrote:Ever heard of irony?
I don't use smilies for nowt do I?
No, you don't. It's because you're not bright enough to manage without them. I bet you can't have a conversation without pulling grotesque faces.
Posted: Fri 05 May 2006, 12:05 am
by ArseSpanker
I suppose this is the wrong thread to comment on TTM's touching avatar pic of two men holding hands.
Posted: Fri 05 May 2006, 1:12 am
by Steve Fett
EXACTLY !!
If you don't understand the humour in this track, then thats your problem. Don't you get errections yourself ?
Posted: Fri 05 May 2006, 2:52 am
by glennjridge
if he didnt like the use of the word a couple times in a song how does he feel about his thread that is 5 pages long of erections flying before his eyes I wonder.
Posted: Fri 05 May 2006, 10:56 am
by !
glennjridge wrote:if he didnt like the use of the word a couple times in a song how does he feel about his thread that is 5 pages long of erections flying before his eyes I wonder.
Posted: Fri 05 May 2006, 4:07 pm
by Very
after all this one is a good song
Posted: Fri 05 May 2006, 4:41 pm
by Technotrancemix
ArseSpanker wrote:I suppose this is the wrong thread to comment on TTM's touching avatar pic of two men holding hands.
I wonder what my master will say about this..?
Posted: Fri 05 May 2006, 4:45 pm
by Technotrancemix
Eldritch wrote:No, you don't. It's because you're not bright enough to manage without them. I bet you can't have a conversation without pulling grotesque faces.
would you like to test me?
Posted: Sat 06 May 2006, 2:52 am
by Technotrancemix
ArseSpanker wrote:I suppose this is the wrong thread to comment on TTM's touching avatar pic of two men holding hands.
wait till you see the pic of me holding Bigboy's *ahem, Word of warning - only fully subscribed members can read this message*
Posted: Sat 06 May 2006, 3:03 am
by patrick
Technotrancemix wrote:I wonder what my master will say about this..?
I had you figured for a sub...
Posted: Sat 06 May 2006, 3:35 am
by ultraplus
Funny how something so natural as an erection
makes everyone so ruffled. Erections occur BILLIONS
OF TIMES EVERY DAY... but it cannot be mentioned in
a song.
Posted: Sat 06 May 2006, 4:31 am
by discotex
Can't believe this was really a topic. Casanova is a fantastic song. Some people really need to get out more often.
Posted: Sun 07 May 2006, 1:39 am
by Shadilly
paninaro28 wrote:was more concerned abt the word "rape" too, seems out of place in a good song. Made all the worse by the context of it bein a dream of rape????
I actually think it very much in place. Blaming one or all women for own impotence, or for that matter other shortages is not an uncommon "reason" for rape. In a lot of rapecases where the rapist cannot hold erection he continues using objects instead.
I were impressed by the insight.
Posted: Sun 07 May 2006, 1:10 pm
by dannii
ultraplus wrote:Funny how something so natural as an erection
makes everyone so ruffled. Erections occur BILLIONS
OF TIMES EVERY DAY...
if they occur billions of times every day, does that mean they occur to Neil & Chris too?
