Minimal midweeks

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
E-Mail Vampire
Posts: 1576
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 7:17 am

#61 Post by E-Mail Vampire »

It is a shame that a really great single has charted so low should have expected it really with previously brilliant singles Being Boring and Love Comes Quickly peaking at 20 and 19

User avatar
Ramzy
Posts: 1051
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 2:46 pm

#62 Post by Ramzy »

It hardly ranks alongside those. To be honest, I don't think it really kicks it as a PSB single. As a dance record, and a good one, maybe, but musically it doesn't really do anything. It's not got a strong enough chorus to be memorable and it's not hooky enough. Remember 'oh-oh, I'm with Stupid'? I think this is more of the I get along school of low chart position than the 'Being boring' school.

Well, I suppose M-I-N-I-M-A-L is reasonably hooky. But it still sounds like an album track to me. It's a track rather than a song, innit?
I must disengage your recreational music.

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

#63 Post by Undertaker »

After the low midweek charts, it did well to hold onto a top 20. It would have been a bit of a disaster if it charted in the 20's. Number 19 is still dissapointing though. For a good song, the whole package wasn't that great. I don't mind what B-side i get because for 2 quid, you can't expect 2 great tracks. The DVD i don't think a lot of people are bothered about, although i don't mind them. It was cd2 that was poor. Those remixes were rubbish. I cannot understand the fascination with remixes. A few are ok but most are piss weak.

At the end of the day, its their 37th top 20 hit, isn't it? And 20 successive top 20 hits. A great effort, that is.

Dave

reality_check

*DP*

#64 Post by reality_check »

*DP*

reality_check

WHAT a lot of excuses!!

#65 Post by reality_check »

Undertaker wrote:After the low midweek charts, it did well to hold onto a top 20. It would have been a bit of a disaster if it charted in the 20's. Number 19 is still dissapointing though. For a good song, the whole package wasn't that great. I don't mind what B-side i get because for 2 quid, you can't expect 2 great tracks. The DVD i don't think a lot of people are bothered about, although i don't mind them. It was cd2 that was poor. Those remixes were rubbish. I cannot understand the fascination with remixes. A few are ok but most are piss weak.

At the end of the day, its their 37th top 20 hit, isn't it? And 20 successive top 20 hits. A great effort, that is.

Dave
Ever heard of the term APOLOGIST?


An Erasure fan version of yourself could give any of the wholly subjective excuses you give to explain an unexpected PSB performance(compared to what you claim initially) when defending a poorer performance of an Erasure record. Once again you are just being biased to your fanatiscism and widening the goal posts to make PSB results look relatively better when in fact objectively it changes nothing - just giving them a poorer standard to live up to.

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

#66 Post by Undertaker »

You what? You what? You what, you what you what?

Dave

User avatar
pulse
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006, 10:00 pm

#67 Post by pulse »

reality_check is correct. If you'd like to see how much of an Erasure fan Undertaker is, why don't you all go visit him on the Erasure forum as Yid Army? It's nice to pose on here and beat your chest against "your rivals" :roll: but then you're posting on the Erasure forum almost every single day (especially if you count all your other incarnations that you've been) LOL.

Technotrancemix

#68 Post by Technotrancemix »

why is it that whenever Erasure is mentioned on this forum, Undertaker has to be the main person behind it?

User avatar
pulse
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006, 10:00 pm

#69 Post by pulse »

Technotrancemix wrote:why is it that whenever Erasure is mentioned on this forum, Undertaker has to be the main person behind it?
Excellent question.

User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 4087
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
Been thanked: 1 time

#70 Post by retrofuturist »

Erasure, Erasure, Erasure... who cares?

Great band, sure... but of no relevance here.

Post Reply