Official: New album title and release

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
neilsblueeyes
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed 29 Oct 2003, 11:42 pm
Contact:

#61 Post by neilsblueeyes »

zukunft wrote:"The Stonk" is a fake. Neil wrote a private e-mail to www.psb-online.com that this title doesn't exist.
Did he really? 'Tis a shame - they could then have called the album "Stonking". :D

Could there be a song called "Fundamental" too? - history would suggest there probably isn't. I wonder why this news wasn't in Literally, but I'm glad they've revealed these two titles (I mean "Fundamental" and "Minimal", not anything else!) so early, at least it saves weeks of rumours, people claiming to have inside info, or us eventually finding out from HMV's website or something. It's nicer for them to tell the world first.

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

#62 Post by Undertaker »

neilsblueeyes wrote: Did he really? 'Tis a shame - they could then have called the album "Stonking". :D

Could there be a song called "Fundamental" too? - history would suggest there probably isn't. I wonder why this news wasn't in Literally, but I'm glad they've revealed these two titles (I mean "Fundamental" and "Minimal", not anything else!) so early, at least it saves weeks of rumours, people claiming to have inside info, or us eventually finding out from HMV's website or something. It's nicer for them to tell the world first.
Hello stranger,

Maybe it wasn't in Literally because they have recently changed their mind. It wouldn't be the first time. The album title sounds more like a single title to me and 'Minimal' sounds like an album title.

Dave

User avatar
gareth
Posts: 1121
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:19 pm
Contact:

#63 Post by gareth »

Just for the record, the album and single news is on page 351 of Teletext here in the UK.
Furious angels will bring you back to me

User avatar
black
Posts: 644
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 9:46 am

#64 Post by black »

Fundamental :think: I already imagine a wall of bricks depicted on cover...

What else should we expect from Neil and Chris at their age. To sing about love, stars, nightingales and other romantic stuff , it is unbecoming for a man at his 60th decade.
Integrals would do. And I suppose 'Sodom and gommorah show' is about modern television which irritates Neil with its immorality, unlike it was at times of his youth. when grass was greener :roll:

.. i dont expect anything good from that album and hope it will help me to forget about Pet Shop boys forever

User avatar
Ghost within this house
Posts: 3347
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 8:41 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

#65 Post by Ghost within this house »

black wrote:Fundamental :think: I already imagine a wall of bricks depicted on cover...

What else should we expect from Neil and Chris at their age. To sing about love, stars, nightingales and other romantic stuff , it is unbecoming for a man at his 60th decade.
Integrals would do. And I suppose 'Sodom and gommorah show' is about modern television which irritates Neil with its immorality, unlike it was at times of his youth. when grass was greener :roll:

.. i dont expect anything good from that album and hope it will help me to forget about Pet Shop boys forever
Hey, black, this is Neil Tennant we're talking about, not Barbara Woodhouse! Neil may be 600 years old as your post suggests, but he still has a highly sophisticated and dynamic view of contemporary society...

btw, not logging on and contributing to the Pet Shop Boys Community might also help you forget about Pet Shop boys forever!! :roll:
Firing verbal shots.......like a Tommy Gun

Decisional
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed 12 Oct 2005, 11:57 pm

#66 Post by Decisional »

...supposing that last entry was from our favourite psycho, mr JD? :roll:
Eric
Thunder... It's July

Decisional
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed 12 Oct 2005, 11:57 pm

#67 Post by Decisional »

(Not Ghost within this house, but black, of course) :lol:
Eric
Thunder... It's July

User avatar
GalataPSB
Posts: 6137
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:10 pm

#68 Post by GalataPSB »

shamelessbehave wrote:
Vince wrote:
shamelessbehave wrote: Then this theory I said on my message above could be right :shock:
As well as in English......






But you all knew that i suppose :( :lol:
:lol:

I wanna watch GAREZ!!!

User avatar
black
Posts: 644
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 9:46 am

#69 Post by black »

Ghost within this house wrote: Neil may be 600 years old as your post suggests
odd 0 :lol: i always make mistakes
Ghost within this house wrote:, but he still has a highly sophisticated and dynamic view of contemporary society...
and i m not interested in his views on contemporary society, Chris's are more dynamic.
Ghost within this house wrote: btw, not logging on and contributing to the Pet Shop Boys Community might also help you forget about Pet Shop boys forever!! :roll:

probably it might, but how will i leave people without me, i m so needed here, see what Option wrote

User avatar
Shopper
Posts: 2350
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:52 pm
Contact:

#70 Post by Shopper »

great news.... :mrgreen:

I wud have preferred all the song titles to be one word as well..
Left to my own devices, I probably would...

https://www.instagram.com/chit2clix/

User avatar
Ghost within this house
Posts: 3347
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 8:41 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

#71 Post by Ghost within this house »

black wrote:
Ghost within this house wrote: Neil may be 600 years old as your post suggests
odd 0 :lol: i always make mistakes

Ghost within this house wrote:, but he still has a highly sophisticated and dynamic view of contemporary society...
and i m not interested in his views on contemporary society, Chris's are more dynamic.
fine, but you're interested enough in them to misrepresent them totally!! Perhaps you should re-double your interest just to avoid making gross errors
black wrote:
Ghost within this house wrote: btw, not logging on and contributing to the Pet Shop Boys Community might also help you forget about Pet Shop boys forever!! :roll:

probably it might, but how will i leave people without me, i m so needed here, see what Option wrote
Why should what Option wrote be of any interest to me?
Firing verbal shots.......like a Tommy Gun

User avatar
Pertan
Posts: 1663
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2005, 8:23 am
Contact:

#72 Post by Pertan »

zukunft wrote:
Vicki wrote:The stonk :?:

Is there any proof that The Stonk is really in the album? Where has this title come from?
"The Stonk" is a fake. Neil wrote a private e-mail to www.psb-online.com that this title doesn't exist.
I like it that it's a fake. But I wonder what "peoples states bank" (www.psb-online.com) said after got Neils e-mail :lol:

User avatar
black
Posts: 644
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 9:46 am

#73 Post by black »

Ghost within this house wrote: fine, but you're interested enough in them to misrepresent them totally!! Perhaps you should re-double your interest just to avoid making gross errors?
what i misrepresent, where? I don't want views on contemporary society. i like when neil sings about his unhappy loves. It is very entertaining
Ghost within this house wrote:Why should what Option wrote be of any interest to me?
it explains why i can't go away. I m so loved here as nowhere :P

Dipso
Posts: 3552
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:39 pm

#74 Post by Dipso »

zukunft wrote:
Vicki wrote:The stonk :?:

Is there any proof that The Stonk is really in the album? Where has this title come from?
"The Stonk" is a fake. Neil wrote a private e-mail to www.psb-online.com that this title doesn't exist.
It wasn't a fake. It was a joke.
Prick up your ears.

Dipso
Posts: 3552
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:39 pm

#75 Post by Dipso »

Janet Street-Porter wrote:
Dipso wrote:Somebody is looking for a spanking!
Promises, promises. :wink:
Right - that's it. Bend over!
Prick up your ears.

Post Reply