CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
- Undertaker
- Posts: 8983
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
Another example of ''bump'' is an uneven part on the floor. Or if someone is ill, they get huge 'bumpy' eyes.
- pulse
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006, 10:00 pm
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
It's odd how you still haven't answered the question I asked you about what your account name is on that other forum. All you are concerned about is making pedantic insults about another band's looks and personal lives - but that's the base level that you are stuck at, isn't it? You wallow in the lowest common denominator because you get owned in every other category (unless it has to do with spouting off endless chart stats like an accountant with no life and no artistic bone in his body).
Erasure happen to be my favourite band, not for anything to do with anyone's personal lives (who knows what's private in other people's realms, eh?), but because of their musicality. As much as I do love a lot of PSB's output and I consider myself a fan, I would much rather the voice that enters my ear be Andy's rather than Neil's. After all, once the CD is put in the player, any personal lives, looks, and all other shallow minutiae your brain festers in just melt away. It's sound. It's not PR. It's not chart stats. It's not sales. It's not looks. It's something intangible that you will never know about - and quite frankly, Erasure rule in this particular realm.
That leotard-clad voice that was once hooked on cocaine is far more listenable than, say, Neil's on "Pandemonium" - do you remember the song "If I Had Words" from the Babe soundtrack? The vocal isn't that far off. It's not enough to completely ruin the song, but I can see why you've desperately taken to talk of sales/charts/looks/personal lives... basically, anything that diverts from the musicality of things. You're like a gossipping hairdresser ranting about what's new (or rather, old) in the stars' lives, when you could have spent far longer and been far more effective waxing poetic about why you love your favourite band. Rather, you've spent a large portion of 5000 odd posts, and perhaps the same amount as other "incognito" accounts on other forums, trying to bash another band. How utterly sad, and what a complete waste. Even your compliments to PSB on the main forum are adorned with the cheap plastic trinkets of charts stats and sales figures - there are only so many times people here can "..and a band 25 years on having hits like this..." ad nauseum. You're like a malfunctioning, bellicose robot rebel with no cause, and most of the time, you incite the worst in people by attacking their looks. It's the desperate lowest point and the sign of least intelligence.
I say all this this cheering on PSB chartwise - I'd be ecstatic if a synth-based band I have been a fan of since the mid 80's can hit the #1 spot. Heck, I'd be ecstatic if they hit top five, and they will be doing just that. It's funny how you think some people are disappointed in PSB's album chart success, but if you ask the vast majority of Erasure fans about it, including myself, you'll find they, too, are just as happy to see PSB doing well. Now, if PSB don't collapse in the following week, it will be an astounding breakthrough worthy of further celebration. Mind you, if Yes alternatively peaked at #47, you should still be celebrating the release of a new PSB album, but I dare say, sadly, I think it would tarnish your enjoyment.
Erasure happen to be my favourite band, not for anything to do with anyone's personal lives (who knows what's private in other people's realms, eh?), but because of their musicality. As much as I do love a lot of PSB's output and I consider myself a fan, I would much rather the voice that enters my ear be Andy's rather than Neil's. After all, once the CD is put in the player, any personal lives, looks, and all other shallow minutiae your brain festers in just melt away. It's sound. It's not PR. It's not chart stats. It's not sales. It's not looks. It's something intangible that you will never know about - and quite frankly, Erasure rule in this particular realm.
That leotard-clad voice that was once hooked on cocaine is far more listenable than, say, Neil's on "Pandemonium" - do you remember the song "If I Had Words" from the Babe soundtrack? The vocal isn't that far off. It's not enough to completely ruin the song, but I can see why you've desperately taken to talk of sales/charts/looks/personal lives... basically, anything that diverts from the musicality of things. You're like a gossipping hairdresser ranting about what's new (or rather, old) in the stars' lives, when you could have spent far longer and been far more effective waxing poetic about why you love your favourite band. Rather, you've spent a large portion of 5000 odd posts, and perhaps the same amount as other "incognito" accounts on other forums, trying to bash another band. How utterly sad, and what a complete waste. Even your compliments to PSB on the main forum are adorned with the cheap plastic trinkets of charts stats and sales figures - there are only so many times people here can "..and a band 25 years on having hits like this..." ad nauseum. You're like a malfunctioning, bellicose robot rebel with no cause, and most of the time, you incite the worst in people by attacking their looks. It's the desperate lowest point and the sign of least intelligence.
I say all this this cheering on PSB chartwise - I'd be ecstatic if a synth-based band I have been a fan of since the mid 80's can hit the #1 spot. Heck, I'd be ecstatic if they hit top five, and they will be doing just that. It's funny how you think some people are disappointed in PSB's album chart success, but if you ask the vast majority of Erasure fans about it, including myself, you'll find they, too, are just as happy to see PSB doing well. Now, if PSB don't collapse in the following week, it will be an astounding breakthrough worthy of further celebration. Mind you, if Yes alternatively peaked at #47, you should still be celebrating the release of a new PSB album, but I dare say, sadly, I think it would tarnish your enjoyment.
- Undertaker
- Posts: 8983
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
You have just spent god knows how long writing that and all it is, is a volume made up of the many chapters you have posted before, on a forum you where you have turned into a one man band, singing the same old tired tune. I wonder where you get your idea's.... Not only that, it was a rant posted because i posted an Erasure interview in an Erasure thread. I take it you have run out of prozac. Or maybe it was because i made you look a wally after you bumped your little post
As for the name calling. I retalliated at you after you once again, droaned on abour grammar. It's all you can do when you have once again found yourself in the long grass. You can dish it out but you certainly cannot take it.
You are still going on about being a PSB fan. Give it a rest FFS. NOBODY is buying it. The proof was in the Love etc chart position thread (not that we needed it) You made yourself look a right twit. All of a sudden dissapearing, after the gloating of a possible failure of Love etc. Hard luck. If 'Yes' was struggling it the mid 20's in it's first week (like some bands) you would have been sniffing around it like an Erasure fan with serious issues. Oh.....
As for sales, the reason you mock them is because Erasure can't cut it. If they were still making dents in the chart, you would be all over it like Shingles.
After all your stressing and ranting, i do feel sorry for you a touch. You are like a Sunday School kid. No one takes in what you say, or believes it, yet they are too polite to shut the door in your face. Although there is one difference - The Sunday School lad wouldn't go on and on about himself.
As for the name calling. I retalliated at you after you once again, droaned on abour grammar. It's all you can do when you have once again found yourself in the long grass. You can dish it out but you certainly cannot take it.
You are still going on about being a PSB fan. Give it a rest FFS. NOBODY is buying it. The proof was in the Love etc chart position thread (not that we needed it) You made yourself look a right twit. All of a sudden dissapearing, after the gloating of a possible failure of Love etc. Hard luck. If 'Yes' was struggling it the mid 20's in it's first week (like some bands) you would have been sniffing around it like an Erasure fan with serious issues. Oh.....
As for sales, the reason you mock them is because Erasure can't cut it. If they were still making dents in the chart, you would be all over it like Shingles.
After all your stressing and ranting, i do feel sorry for you a touch. You are like a Sunday School kid. No one takes in what you say, or believes it, yet they are too polite to shut the door in your face. Although there is one difference - The Sunday School lad wouldn't go on and on about himself.
-
Minimalizm
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Thu 26 Feb 2009, 9:52 am
- Contact:
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
I did not know Vince is living in Maine, the home of Stephen King, my all-time hero 
- homer1972
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 2:20 am
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
C'mon lads don't get too personal now, it's only a bit of fun on here remember.It's one thing to joke about hooker mums or whose the best singer out of two queens but let's not cross the line. 
she's a little goer.
- pulse
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006, 10:00 pm
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
I don't even know three quarters of what you're talking about here.Undertaker wrote:You have just spent god knows how long writing that and all it is, is a volume made up of the many chapters you have posted before, on a forum you where you have turned into a one man band, singing the same old tired tune. I wonder where you get your idea's.... Not only that, it was a rant posted because i posted an Erasure interview in an Erasure thread. I take it you have run out of prozac. Or maybe it was because i made you look a wally after you bumped your little post![]()
As for the name calling. I retalliated at you after you once again, droaned on abour grammar. It's all you can do when you have once again found yourself in the long grass. You can dish it out but you certainly cannot take it.
You are still going on about being a PSB fan. Give it a rest FFS. NOBODY is buying it. The proof was in the Love etc chart position thread (not that we needed it) You made yourself look a right twit. All of a sudden dissapearing, after the gloating of a possible failure of Love etc. Hard luck. If 'Yes' was struggling it the mid 20's in it's first week (like some bands) you would have been sniffing around it like an Erasure fan with serious issues. Oh.....
As for sales, the reason you mock them is because Erasure can't cut it. If they were still making dents in the chart, you would be all over it like Shingles.
After all your stressing and ranting, i do feel sorry for you a touch. You are like a Sunday School kid. No one takes in what you say, or believes it, yet they are too polite to shut the door in your face. Although there is one difference - The Sunday School lad wouldn't go on and on about himself.
I suggest you re-read my post, as you seem delusional. You do realise that almost all of what you say is either incorrect or misguided, right? Talk about someone running out of medication - it looks like your schizophrenia has returned, and it's perfectly documented in your last email.
Oh yeah, nice evading of my question again. Schizophrenia is a medical condition, cowardice is simply unbecoming. Once again, why are you hiding your account name on the Erasure forum?
- homer1972
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 2:20 am
- homer1972
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 2:20 am
- Undertaker
- Posts: 8983
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
A forum classicpulse wrote: Oh yeah, nice evading of my question again. Schizophrenia is a medical condition, cowardice is simply unbecoming. Once again, why are you hiding your account name on the Erasure forum?
You have completely run out of idea's. I thought you sneaking out of the Love etc midweeks was embarressing but now you are going on about my account on another forum
Who am i to get in the way of your pastime. If you want to come on a PSB forum and go on about usernames elsewhere, thats up to you but the rest of us don't give a shit
Last edited by Undertaker on Sun 29 Mar 2009, 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
- homer1972
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 2:20 am
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
You doWhy? Who the f*** cares who's who on another forum?
she's a little goer.
- Undertaker
- Posts: 8983
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
Only just seen this. Classic postFugitive1979 wrote:Well, Pulse and Tuff Enuff, having read the latest instalment, I come to this conclusion: Your arguments have crashed and burned. Now you both sound desperate.
You have both been...
- Undertaker
- Posts: 8983
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
Unlucky. I'm not the one going onto other forums and talking about members on here. Although seeing someone banned from their own forum is hilarioushomer1972 wrote:You doWhy? Who the f*** cares who's who on another forum?![]()
- homer1972
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 2:20 am
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
Of course you don't care Dave who is who on another forum
http://www.petshopboys-forum.com/viewto ... 16#p333916
Want any more links to trip yourself up with?

http://www.petshopboys-forum.com/viewto ... 16#p333916
Want any more links to trip yourself up with?
she's a little goer.
- Undertaker
- Posts: 8983
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm
Re: CENTRAL ERASURE TOPICS
I'm on a PSB forum. I'm not going on other forums and demanding answershomer1972 wrote:Of course you don't care Dave who is who on another forum![]()
http://www.petshopboys-forum.com/viewto ... 16#p333916
Want any more links to trip yourself up with?![]()
- homer1972
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 2:20 am


