MPs expenses

For 'Off Topic' and non-PSB music threads.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Dipso
Posts: 3552
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:39 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#76 Post by Dipso »

MPs apparently earn more than 96% of the UK population:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8072031.stm
Prick up your ears.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9955
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MPs expenses

#77 Post by Patrick Bateman »

The fact that these crooks will still get lucrative pay-offs is quite astounding. Surely it's about time somebody attempted to blow the Houses of Parliament up again.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... -offs.html

User avatar
Blogo
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu 21 Jun 2007, 8:45 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#78 Post by Blogo »

Jeffrey Donaldson (MP in NI) spent 410 pounds on special, and I quote, "security drapes" , that are heavier than normal drapes, the best part was that he installed the drapes in his flat in London, Greenwich. Like his home is going to be under siege there.

"Look jeffrey they are coming, quick wrap yourself in those fine drapes which you purchased with tax payers money"
Last edited by Blogo on Fri 29 May 2009, 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Listen without prejudice

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9955
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MPs expenses

#79 Post by Patrick Bateman »

I dunno, there are a lot of pirates around Greenwich.

Dipso
Posts: 3552
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:39 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#80 Post by Dipso »

Patrick Bateman wrote:The fact that these crooks will still get lucrative pay-offs is quite astounding. Surely it's about time somebody attempted to blow the Houses of Parliament up again.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... -offs.html
You really couldn't make it up. Rewards for failure yet again.
Prick up your ears.

User avatar
redsock
Posts: 2393
Joined: Sat 08 Feb 2003, 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: MPs expenses

#81 Post by redsock »

Wow ..... words fail me ..... :evil: :shock:

Labour MP Frank Cook has apologised for apparently trying to claim back from the taxpayer a £5 donation he made during a church service to commemorate the Battle of Britain.


http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx? ... id=hotmail

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9955
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MPs expenses

#82 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Am I missing something here? First Blears and now Purnell, two ministers with highly questionable expenses claims, rewarding Gordon for not sacking their asses by knifing him in the back.

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#83 Post by Undertaker »

How come nobody has been charged with fraud?

User avatar
leahysb
Posts: 258
Joined: Sun 11 Feb 2007, 8:07 am

Re: MPs expenses

#84 Post by leahysb »

Undertaker wrote:How come nobody has been charged with fraud?
Because laws and rules and regulations like that only apply to the "little people" :grumble: :grumble: :grumble:
... Che Guevara and Debussy to a disco beat ...

User avatar
redsock
Posts: 2393
Joined: Sat 08 Feb 2003, 4:58 pm
Contact:

Re: MPs expenses

#85 Post by redsock »

We should take adopt a law like they have in Thailand ... Even if there's no evidence that a law has been broken or offence committed, you can still be done for being "unnaturally wealthy" if you can't prove that your money has come from legitimate means.

User avatar
kimphilby
Posts: 1196
Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006, 4:48 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#86 Post by kimphilby »

Patrick Bateman wrote:Am I missing something here? First Blears and now Purnell, two ministers with highly questionable expenses claims, rewarding Gordon for not sacking their asses by knifing him in the back.
Its strange isn't it. And Blears (who takes 'common little mad woman with no oratory skills' to a whole new level) wears a brooch with "Rock the boat" written on it. Sorry???
You've already disgraced yourself with your verging on the fraudulent expenses claims/ dodgy 2nd home mortgage benefits, and then you try to paint yourself as some sort of quirky rebel...you have no shame you daft bint. Get out of my face.

User avatar
StevePSB
Site Admin
Posts: 4953
Joined: Wed 08 Jan 2003, 2:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: MPs expenses

#87 Post by StevePSB »

My thoughts exactly on Blears. It was planned, disgusting behaviour on her part and to go as far as to make sure she was are photographed wearing the 'Rocking the boat' brooch, that's just taking the p*ss. Spiteful, childish cow. The behaviour is no worse than a school child running off with the ball because he or she owns it. I suspect it won't be the last we hear from her either.

I couldn't have lived with myself if I'd have protest voted or not voted yesterday. I made the short journey to the Polling station (which was very hard work on crutches, let me tell you!) and voted Labour twice. I don't expect it will have made any difference, but at least I can still say I have never sold out my principles.


StevePSB

Dipso
Posts: 3552
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:39 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#88 Post by Dipso »

Blears is a piece of work, isn't she? How can she pretend to be taking some kind of moral high ground? We all know she fiddled her capital gains tax and was going to be fired by Gordon Brown in the re-shuffle.
Prick up your ears.

User avatar
kimphilby
Posts: 1196
Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006, 4:48 pm

Re: MPs expenses

#89 Post by kimphilby »

Blears is thicker than a retarded pig floundering in 10 tonnes of very thick shit

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9955
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MPs expenses

#90 Post by Patrick Bateman »

One of the crooks has already been re-appointed a minister after the usual whitewash of a report, but I wouldn't get too comfortable at that cabinet table just yet, Shahid.....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... ffice.html

Post Reply