Pet Shop Boys Community

Couple of people on here are talking so much utter drivel it just proves the mods were right. Interesting how they have hijacked the thread again to promote their views down everyones throats yet again. The actual topic of this thread was about changes to the forum suggesting we discuss why they have had to be made but since that would have probably meant talking about a couple of members who take pride in pissing everyone off I guess that topic was never going to go far so here we are yet again......... am I scared to comment, no. Do I want to comment, no. Do these threads offend me, no. Am I bored senseless of these threads, yes. Sadly I also detest internet bullies and trolls so here I am yet again.

BugBoy wrote:Couple of people on here are talking so much utter drivel it just proves the mods were right. Interesting how they have hijacked the thread again to promote their views down everyones throats yet again. The actual topic of this thread was about changes to the forum suggesting we discuss why they have had to be made but since that would have probably meant talking about a couple of members who take pride in pissing everyone off I guess that topic was never going to go far so here we are yet again......... am I scared to comment, no. Do I want to comment, no. Do these threads offend me, no. Am I bored senseless of these threads, yes. Sadly I also detest internet bullies and trolls so here I am yet again.

Suck-up to moderators, tick.
Personal attack, tick.
Faux sense of outrage and indignation, tick.
Full dose of sanctimony, tick.
Garnishing of hypocrisy, tick.

It's a bedwetting liberal full house!!!!!

JSDOUVRES wrote:

dynamobjornen wrote:http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/52add2c4 ... abdc0.html

well here is another link, it's not all the wests fault, but the west is not totally innocent either. Like you say Iraq was not a peaceful nation prior 1991

Any credible links?.

No, The Daily Mail did not write anything about it

BugBoy wrote:Couple of people on here are talking so much utter drivel it just proves the mods were right. Interesting how they have hijacked the thread again to promote their views down everyones throats yet again. The actual topic of this thread was about changes to the forum suggesting we discuss why they have had to be made but since that would have probably meant talking about a couple of members who take pride in pissing everyone off I guess that topic was never going to go far so here we are yet again......... am I scared to comment, no. Do I want to comment, no. Do these threads offend me, no. Am I bored senseless of these threads, yes. Sadly I also detest internet bullies and trolls so here I am yet again.

So you don't think things have improved? lol!

BlueSwan wrote:

JSDOUVRES wrote: The moral of this story is to maybe look at your own countries history before picking on another? Just a thought.....

That's by far the most sensible thing you have written in this thread. Maybe you should try that approach yourself!

Always have, in what respect do you mean exactly? I'd really like to know. Thanks.

dynamobjornen wrote:

JSDOUVRES wrote:

dynamobjornen wrote:http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/52add2c4 ... abdc0.html

well here is another link, it's not all the wests fault, but the west is not totally innocent either. Like you say Iraq was not a peaceful nation prior 1991

Any credible links?.

No, The Daily Mail did not write anything about it

There are many more websites than just the Daily Mail you know. But if that is all you can say then I guess your answer is definately NO!

dynamobjornen wrote:

BugBoy wrote:Couple of people on here are talking so much utter drivel it just proves the mods were right. Interesting how they have hijacked the thread again to promote their views down everyones throats yet again. The actual topic of this thread was about changes to the forum suggesting we discuss why they have had to be made but since that would have probably meant talking about a couple of members who take pride in pissing everyone off I guess that topic was never going to go far so here we are yet again......... am I scared to comment, no. Do I want to comment, no. Do these threads offend me, no. Am I bored senseless of these threads, yes. Sadly I also detest internet bullies and trolls so here I am yet again.

So you don't think things have improved? lol!

No they have not, he is still reading topics that he knows he wont like and doesnt like to read or post about for some reason. Quite confusing really. And pissing everybody off? Astounding!

Patrick Bateman wrote:

BugBoy wrote:Couple of people on here are talking so much utter drivel it just proves the mods were right. Interesting how they have hijacked the thread again to promote their views down everyones throats yet again. The actual topic of this thread was about changes to the forum suggesting we discuss why they have had to be made but since that would have probably meant talking about a couple of members who take pride in pissing everyone off I guess that topic was never going to go far so here we are yet again......... am I scared to comment, no. Do I want to comment, no. Do these threads offend me, no. Am I bored senseless of these threads, yes. Sadly I also detest internet bullies and trolls so here I am yet again.

Suck-up to moderators, tick.
Personal attack, tick.
Faux sense of outrage and indignation, tick.
Full dose of sanctimony, tick.
Garnishing of hypocrisy, tick.

It's a bedwetting liberal full house!!!!!

Absolutely %100 true. Quite pathetic really.

We're both totally off topic and getting personal. I will lock if this thread continues in this vein.


StevePSB

dynamobjornen wrote:

BugBoy wrote:Couple of people on here are talking so much utter drivel it just proves the mods were right. Interesting how they have hijacked the thread again to promote their views down everyones throats yet again. The actual topic of this thread was about changes to the forum suggesting we discuss why they have had to be made but since that would have probably meant talking about a couple of members who take pride in pissing everyone off I guess that topic was never going to go far so here we are yet again......... am I scared to comment, no. Do I want to comment, no. Do these threads offend me, no. Am I bored senseless of these threads, yes. Sadly I also detest internet bullies and trolls so here I am yet again.

So you don't think things have improved? lol!

hahaha, sadly no, as you can see I was outwitted by this childish and banal response:

Patrick Bateman wrote:

BugBoy wrote:Couple of people on here are talking so much utter drivel it just proves the mods were right. Interesting how they have hijacked the thread again to promote their views down everyones throats yet again. The actual topic of this thread was about changes to the forum suggesting we discuss why they have had to be made but since that would have probably meant talking about a couple of members who take pride in pissing everyone off I guess that topic was never going to go far so here we are yet again......... am I scared to comment, no. Do I want to comment, no. Do these threads offend me, no. Am I bored senseless of these threads, yes. Sadly I also detest internet bullies and trolls so here I am yet again.

Suck-up to moderators, tick.
Personal attack, tick.
Faux sense of outrage and indignation, tick.
Full dose of sanctimony, tick.
Garnishing of hypocrisy, tick.

It's a bedwetting liberal full house!!!!!

I'm sure they had a little giggle and gave themselves a nice pat on the back for that.

and earlier someone else who loves to sit up in his self styled moral highground, preaching about free speech whilst simultaniously shouting everyone else down who suggests a different viewpoint came up with this little gem:

JSDOUVRES wrote:Did you enjoy the video Galata? Death to an imperialist, right up your ally.

Quite how they thought suggesting a fellow forum member would enjoy such a vile and hideous thing is beyond belief and saying it in such a flipant and casual manner is totally beyond me

So yea same old same old

You don't do sarcasm do you? Or common sense. And certainly not freedom of speech. I didn't realise that freedom of speech to some people means that I have no right to question or disagree with other peoples opinions. I always thought that freedom of speech meant that I actually DO have that right. Although to you it is just "shouting people down". Don't like people not agreeing with you do you?

You learn new things every day, you really do!!

JSDOUVRES wrote:You don't do sarcasm do you? Or common sense. And certainly not freedom of speech. I didn't realise that freedom of speech to some people means that I have no right to question or disagree with other peoples opinions. I always thought that freedom of speech meant that I actually DO have that right. Although to you it is just "shouting people down". Don't like people not agreeing with you do you?

You learn new things every day, you really do!!

My middle name is sarcasm, I just don't think that was an appropriate thing to say to anyone in any context in a public forum. Sarcasm is something not familiar to everyone, a little thought and respect to others of different cultures goes a long way. It's comments exactly if that ilk that have lead to the mods to step in. A lack of thought and respect of different cultures through the eons is how we have come to the mess in the middle east we see today.

As for the rest of your comment........ were you talking to the mirror when you thought that?

BugBoy wrote:

JSDOUVRES wrote:You don't do sarcasm do you? Or common sense. And certainly not freedom of speech. I didn't realise that freedom of speech to some people means that I have no right to question or disagree with other peoples opinions. I always thought that freedom of speech meant that I actually DO have that right. Although to you it is just "shouting people down". Don't like people not agreeing with you do you?

You learn new things every day, you really do!!

As for the rest of your comment........ were you talking to the mirror when you thought that?

I was actually thinking the exact same thing, sorry JSDOUVRES you really need to learn how to debate, just my opinion

JSDOUVRES wrote:

BlueSwan wrote:

JSDOUVRES wrote: The moral of this story is to maybe look at your own countries history before picking on another? Just a thought.....

That's by far the most sensible thing you have written in this thread. Maybe you should try that approach yourself!

Always have, in what respect do you mean exactly? I'd really like to know. Thanks.

Really?

First up, when I pointed out that the judicial system has a racial bias that undermines your entire theory about how muslims get off easily, you claimed that that was only in the US. I then immediately pointed out (with links) that studies show the exact same effect in Britain, which you then proceeded to ignore.

Infact, you seem exclusively preoccupied with what "they" do, while ignoring how you and yours might contribute to the problem. Infact, that is your whole debate style - refusing to even trying to understand which points your opponents are trying to make, instead claiming that they support the terrorists, supports paedophiles, get off on watching beheadings or other such nonsense.

But let this be a test. It will be interesting to see whether you are able to comprehend what I wrote in this post or whether you'll again ignore the points and distort the rest beyond recognition.

I don't care what race of religion you belong to, justice is the same for everybody, I disagree with you that here in Britain ethnic minorities get higher prison sentances, maybe the opposite is true in my opinion. I don't remember seeing any links suggesting otherwise but will have a look.

At the end of the day this is about justice whatever race of religion you belong to, justice based on the law of the land you live in, justice has not been served in Rotherham with children being knowingly raped and many places in the UK too because of race and fear which is disgusting, sorry if you don't agree with that but I find it sick.