Re: Our dreams for Obscure after the 5 shows at EB
Posted: Wed 15 Apr 2026, 10:01 pm
.
I like to think of it as home...
https://www.petshopboys-forum.com/
Agree with this, which is why another run in Europe is probableNotInvisible wrote: Wed 15 Apr 2026, 9:32 pmNo, I'm suggesting they got paid to learn them.markreed wrote: Wed 15 Apr 2026, 9:24 pmAre you genuinely suggesting they haven't practised the songs thoroughly before the first full band rehearsal?
The easiest way to tell your math is off is to observe that virtually no one makes this sort of a show a staple, which would obviously be the case if it was easy money. The other notable stumbling block is that scaling these numbers to arenas results in figures far higher than we know them to be. I'm sure they didn't lose money on the Obscure shows, but neither of them are buying a sports car off the back of it.
Sure they got paid to learn them, and likely got sent the stems recreated by Pete G so they could then play and learn their parts in isolation and play along so by the time the full live band got to the studio they probably had almost all of the 35 songs match ready. So in terms of full band rehearsals 10 days is generous.NotInvisible wrote: Wed 15 Apr 2026, 9:32 pmNo, I'm suggesting they got paid to learn them.markreed wrote: Wed 15 Apr 2026, 9:24 pmAre you genuinely suggesting they haven't practised the songs thoroughly before the first full band rehearsal?
The easiest way to tell your math is off is to observe that virtually no one makes this sort of a show a staple, which would obviously be the case if it was easy money. The other notable stumbling block is that scaling these numbers to arenas results in figures far higher than we know them to be. I'm sure they didn't lose money on the Obscure shows, but neither of them are buying a sports car off the back of it.
No, and this is such a straw man that it's evident you know your ballpark math is baseless. These shows aren't as lucrative as you seem to think, and that's plainly obvious.markreed wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 12:01 amYou seem to think the only thing that matters is that bands can make money and thus, that's the only reason any band does anything.
It isn't ballpark math - if any business can't make a profit on selling £750k of tickets and associated merch for a 5 night run with no AV staging, they're not efficient at all. I doubt you know the average manufacture costs for large run T's/posters, publisher discounts for publications to the author, venue hire, band member or crew costs for staging live events or marginal per day costs of adding extra shows : whereas that is my actual job.NotInvisible wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 2:33 amNo, and this is such a straw man that it's evident you know your ballpark math is baseless. These shows aren't as lucrative as you seem to think, and that's plainly obvious.markreed wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 12:01 amYou seem to think the only thing that matters is that bands can make money and thus, that's the only reason any band does anything.
Of course it is. And again the proof is in the pudding - nobody makes a career out of this, whereas under your model any band with a cult following is guaranteed millions.
Actually, the reason the Dreamworld tour has run so long is more likely because it's a global farewell tour, rather than it being exclusively about marginal cost. Pet Shop Boys have never toured one show for 4 years...logically, they're only going to do that if it's going to be their last global stage hurrah.markreed wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 12:01 amThe whole reason Dreamworld has run so long is because the marginal cost (i.e. day to day running costs) are low compared to revenue, and the upfront investment of staging the show was recouped very early in the touring cycle. But again, and to be clear, if money was all they were interested in, they'd tour 10 months a year. And it isn't.NotInvisible wrote: Wed 15 Apr 2026, 9:32 pmNo, I'm suggesting they got paid to learn them.markreed wrote: Wed 15 Apr 2026, 9:24 pmAre you genuinely suggesting they haven't practised the songs thoroughly before the first full band rehearsal?
The easiest way to tell your math is off is to observe that virtually no one makes this sort of a show a staple, which would obviously be the case if it was easy money. The other notable stumbling block is that scaling these numbers to arenas results in figures far higher than we know them to be. I'm sure they didn't lose money on the Obscure shows, but neither of them are buying a sports car off the back of it.
I've lost track of whether you're factoring one charity night in...markreed wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 7:34 pmIt isn't ballpark math - if any business can't make a profit on selling £750k of tickets and associated merch for a 5 night run with no AV staging, they're not efficient at all. I doubt you know the average manufacture costs for large run T's/posters, publisher discounts for publications to the author, venue hire, band member or crew costs for staging live events or marginal per day costs of adding extra shows : whereas that is my actual job.NotInvisible wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 2:33 amNo, and this is such a straw man that it's evident you know your ballpark math is baseless. These shows aren't as lucrative as you seem to think, and that's plainly obvious.markreed wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 12:01 amYou seem to think the only thing that matters is that bands can make money and thus, that's the only reason any band does anything.
You have to sell out the bigger venues too (which I'm sure would happen), and maybe they really wanted to play there, since it's in Camden, their history, etc.Tentenlad wrote:PSB could have done the Obscure shows in a bigger venue to make money? I would think most acts only charge around £30 for a show in the electric ballroom so they can’t have lost that much?
As for what’s next … A Please / Actually full album show, er please.
The reason Dreamworld continues to run is that the show is booked. Therefore, there is no need for PSB to call it a day. New Order have been doing likewise for ten years without releasing a new album in that time.Morse wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 8:47 pmActually, the reason the Dreamworld tour has run so long is more likely because it's a global farewell tour, rather than it being exclusively about marginal cost. Pet Shop Boys have never toured one show for 4 years...logically, they're only going to do that if it's going to be their last global stage hurrah.markreed wrote: Thu 16 Apr 2026, 12:01 amThe whole reason Dreamworld has run so long is because the marginal cost (i.e. day to day running costs) are low compared to revenue, and the upfront investment of staging the show was recouped very early in the touring cycle. But again, and to be clear, if money was all they were interested in, they'd tour 10 months a year. And it isn't.NotInvisible wrote: Wed 15 Apr 2026, 9:32 pm
No, I'm suggesting they got paid to learn them.
The easiest way to tell your math is off is to observe that virtually no one makes this sort of a show a staple, which would obviously be the case if it was easy money. The other notable stumbling block is that scaling these numbers to arenas results in figures far higher than we know them to be. I'm sure they didn't lose money on the Obscure shows, but neither of them are buying a sports car off the back of it.
The more I think about this the more I now feel I’d agree if they didn’t do box sets especially for singles and b-sides as we have them in some form already. However a collection of rare remixes I’d love to have!jyllinge wrote: Fri 10 Apr 2026, 10:39 pm 1. Obscure in Royal Arena Copenhagen (should be easy to sell out) and other places in Europe.
2. A massive cd/vinyl release of all b-sides in one (remastered)
3. Will we ever get a box set of all singles from start to end?
Actually, a sister version of Volume but this time with all the fan club newsletters, Literallys (all 42 of them), Annuallys and some additional and new conversations etc would be great! …and then Obscure2 to promote itKompakt&Bijou wrote: Tue 14 Apr 2026, 7:09 pm Interestingly in the Guardian last week, Neil explained that one of the motivations for Obscure was to promote Volume:
Intended for hardcore fans, they say it’s partly to promote Volume. “One of the motivations behind it was we didn’t have to do book signings,” Tennant says. “I find them too weird. They’re a bit unnerving.”
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2026/ ... ra-windsor
So perhaps we'll have to wait for another book for another Obscure!