Well, Janet, in asnwer to your question: this is the twelfth time I've not heard Fundamental and the tracks that aren't really standing out for me in a big way are 'Luna Park' and 'Minimal'.
Psychological is one tenth better than Twentieth Century, while Casanova in Hell is only sixth tenths the track that Integral is.
some light detective work...
-
Ghost within this house
- Posts: 3347
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 8:41 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
-
Janet Street-Porter
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed 14 Jan 2004, 12:32 am
I disagree. I prefer Twentieth century to Psychological and am indifferent to Luna Park.Ghost within this house wrote:Well, Janet, in asnwer to your question: this is the twelfth time I've not heard Fundamental and the tracks that aren't really standing out for me in a big way are 'Luna Park' and 'Minimal'.
Psychological is one tenth better than Twentieth Century, while Casanova in Hell is only sixth tenths the track that Integral is.
-
Ghost within this house
- Posts: 3347
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 8:41 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
How can you say that? Pyschological is considerably more 'up-tempo' and its electro style is more suited to what it is than the style of Twentieth Century is suited to what it is.Janet Street-Porter wrote:I disagree. I prefer Twentieth century to Psychological and am indifferent to Luna Park.Ghost within this house wrote:Well, Janet, in asnwer to your question: this is the twelfth time I've not heard Fundamental and the tracks that aren't really standing out for me in a big way are 'Luna Park' and 'Minimal'.
Psychological is one tenth better than Twentieth Century, while Casanova in Hell is only sixth tenths the track that Integral is.
I'm beginning to agree with you about Luna Park, however. I just didn't listen to it again and after the intro (which is quite cool) the rest of it is just, well, the middle and end of a fairly standard track.
Firing verbal shots.......like a Tommy Gun
-
Janet Street-Porter
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Wed 14 Jan 2004, 12:32 am
What do you think about that film that is released next year? I like it and the performance by the leading man in it is excellent. The woman is dead fit too. I don't like it as much as that other film released next year though - it's very exciting and the twist is most unexpected. Roger Ebert has nothing on me. 
-
gareth
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:19 pm
- Contact:
-
Ghost within this house
- Posts: 3347
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 8:41 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
I thought it was tasteless in light of the global political crisis that will be brewing next year. By the way, did you check out the Booker Short List for 2007? A lot of the books on there score 10/10 IMHO.Janet Street-Porter wrote:What do you think about that film that is released next year? I like it and the performance by the leading man in it is excellent. The woman is dead fit too. I don't like it as much as that other film released next year though - it's very exciting and the twist is most unexpected. Roger Ebert has nothing on me.
Firing verbal shots.......like a Tommy Gun
-
Effen Vida
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 4:17 pm
