David Bowie Ryko issues vs. later remasters
Posted: Sat 02 May 2009, 7:59 pm
OK, looking for the opinion of serious audiophiles here. I own a number of the David Bowie Ryko reissues and whilst most of them are ace, I really enjoy Young Americans in particular; it sounds absolutely fantastic on my moderately high end home system.
Here's the thing though, Bowie had his entire catalog re-remastered going 1999 forward because he didn't feel that there was enough bass in many of the tracks, incorrect mixes were used on some bonus tracks, etc.
I've read-up on this issue quite a bit and have found a number of many conflicting views. Many audiophiles consider most of the Ryko issues to be the definitive masters and that the new remasters offer no improvement whatsoever and offer less in terms of bonus material (with a few exceptions such as the recent "David Live" and "Stage" Visconti remasters). Whilst others consider the new 24 bit remasters a slight improvement.
So here is my question for fellow Bowie fans on the board: is it worth spending the extra cash to finish off my Bowie Ryko collection (which are now in many cases collector's items commanding premium prices) or are the new masters a true improvement; or perhaps even worse than the Ryko issues? I must admit that while I'm thrilled with my Ryko Bowie discs, I am curious to buy a few of the new masters (such as Young Americans) and compare them A/B. There truly seems to be no consensus on this issue amongst the Bowie fan community.
Yes, I am anal retentive.
Here's the thing though, Bowie had his entire catalog re-remastered going 1999 forward because he didn't feel that there was enough bass in many of the tracks, incorrect mixes were used on some bonus tracks, etc.
I've read-up on this issue quite a bit and have found a number of many conflicting views. Many audiophiles consider most of the Ryko issues to be the definitive masters and that the new remasters offer no improvement whatsoever and offer less in terms of bonus material (with a few exceptions such as the recent "David Live" and "Stage" Visconti remasters). Whilst others consider the new 24 bit remasters a slight improvement.
So here is my question for fellow Bowie fans on the board: is it worth spending the extra cash to finish off my Bowie Ryko collection (which are now in many cases collector's items commanding premium prices) or are the new masters a true improvement; or perhaps even worse than the Ryko issues? I must admit that while I'm thrilled with my Ryko Bowie discs, I am curious to buy a few of the new masters (such as Young Americans) and compare them A/B. There truly seems to be no consensus on this issue amongst the Bowie fan community.
Yes, I am anal retentive.