Page 1 of 3

Girls Aloud

Posted: Wed 17 Oct 2012, 3:29 pm
by Undertaker
Well they are back. not a bad effort actually

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Wed 17 Oct 2012, 5:21 pm
by Radiophonic
Prefer this ...


Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Wed 17 Oct 2012, 10:13 pm
by PoloPony
I can't wait! I love Girls Aloud, and we know our guys do too :)

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Wed 17 Oct 2012, 11:08 pm
by glennjridge
how I-tunes america hasnt gotten their last album yet is a freakin outrage.

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Wed 17 Oct 2012, 11:22 pm
by Patrick Bateman
It's rather rubbish, isn't it? Whose suggestion was it for them to go urban?

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Wed 17 Oct 2012, 11:41 pm
by Radiophonic
Patrick Bateman wrote:It's rather rubbish, isn't it? Whose suggestion was it for them to go urban?
Dire. It all seems a bit "I tell you what I want, what I really really want ... " at the start.

I liked their Supremes pastiche and the one that was all over the shop and (naturally) this. They were better than the Spice Girls.

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Wed 17 Oct 2012, 11:48 pm
by York Minster
Patrick Bateman wrote:It's rather rubbish, isn't it? Whose suggestion was it for them to go urban?
It's awful garbage. And it wouldn't even play with the garbage in the US. It's production sounds dated and they sound like they are posing, which they no doubt are. I don't understand how forum members are often so quick to judge songs by the like of Ke$ha, Gaga, Posner, whatever, but Girls Aloud is sacred ground? (That said, I like some GA tracks produced by Xenomania).

For perfect up-to-date throway pop, I suggest this:


Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Wed 17 Oct 2012, 11:56 pm
by Patrick Bateman
Radiophonic wrote:They were better than the Spice Girls.
Genital warts are better than the Spice Girls.

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Thu 18 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
by York Minster
I remember liking Wannabe as a youth. It sounds just retched now. I'm pretty sure Say You'll Be There is still good though, though I admit I haven't heard it for awhile. Wasn't Anne Dudley on the first album?

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Thu 18 Oct 2012, 9:50 am
by Patrick Bateman
I recognised Wannabe as the spawn of the Devil the first time round. It was the deal knell for popular culture in the UK.

No Spice Girls = no reality TV, no X Factor, no Celebrity Family Fortunes, no Heat magazine, no Joey Essex.....

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Thu 18 Oct 2012, 10:57 pm
by PoloPony
Patrick Bateman wrote:I recognised Wannabe as the spawn of the Devil the first time round. It was the deal knell for popular culture in the UK.

No Spice Girls = no reality TV, no X Factor, no Celebrity Family Fortunes, no Heat magazine, no Joey Essex.....
I see no correlation between the Spice Girls and those shows.

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Thu 18 Oct 2012, 11:25 pm
by Patrick Bateman
PoloPony wrote:I see no correlation between the Spice Girls and those shows.
Really? The Spice Girls represent the first intimation that literally anybody can be a pop star in the modern epoch. Of course it had been done before (Sheena Easton, for instance) but there was something so relentlessly plebeian (to use the argot of the moment) about Biffy, Bunty, Batface, Ballcruncher and the Fonz that they set the template for the next decade. It's really only a tiny step from the Spice Girls to Popstars and Hearsay. Significantly they also appealed to a younger demographic than pop had previously done; whereas teenagers were the traditional constituency of the pop chart, the Spice Girls appealed to tweenies. Look at all the ghastly tweenie acts that followed in their wake: S Club 7, Lolly, The Jimmy Savile Experience. And then there's the football crossover; Bunty and Becks were the harbingers of Heat magazine celebrity culture. To top it all off, New Labour are elected the year after Wannabe and the Spice Girls represent the apogee of intellectual attainment in Blair's brave new world of dumbed down cultural degeneration. Girl Power!

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Thu 18 Oct 2012, 11:55 pm
by Radiophonic
Also: Ginger Spice was a judge on Popstars - one of the precursors of The X Factor - where they discovered all the members of Girls Aloud.

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Fri 19 Oct 2012, 1:21 am
by York Minster
Maybe you guys didn't have much of New Kids On the Block over there, but they were a "tweenies" groups. And Backstreet Boys were out before Spice Girls. Reality TV didn't hit the US until 2000 if I remember.

Re: Girls Aloud

Posted: Fri 19 Oct 2012, 3:32 am
by Palpatine
York Minster wrote:Maybe you guys didn't have much of New Kids On the Block over there, but they were a "tweenies" groups. And Backstreet Boys were out before Spice Girls. Reality TV didn't hit the US until 2000 if I remember.
Take That was the British analogue of NKOTB. The thing about "reality shows" hitting the US later than in the UK and the rest of Europe ignores the fact that almost all of the reality shows that became huge in the US in the early 'naughts - American Idol, Survivor, etc. - were European imports. If, as Patrick Bateman wrote, it's a tiny step from Spice Girls to Popstars, it's not a much larger one from Spice Girls to Kelly Clarkson and then to a show like Glee. You could probably make a good case that the Spice Girls are the most important pop group of the last two decades. They're the Typhoid Mary of modern pop culture.