Potemkim release date rescheduled

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
AlfonsoPSB
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 11:47 pm

Potemkim release date rescheduled

#1 Post by AlfonsoPSB »

From the official site:
Contrary to our earlier report, September 5 looks to stand as the release date of the "Battleship Potemkin" CD. Artwork is not quite finished and a sample permission is outstanding but EMI, releasing the CD as a joint venture between EMI Classics and Parlophone, are confident of maintaining the release date for the UK and Europe. Japan will follow slightly later. There is no USA release date at the moment.
So September 5 again. :)

MarcoS
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 8:46 pm

#2 Post by MarcoS »

Nice piece of news 8)
"All women become like their mothers. That's their tragedy. Men don't, and that's theirs."
Oscar Wilde

Facebook: Marco Steiz
http://www.myspace.com/numb75

User avatar
Pani
Posts: 8208
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:51 am
Contact:

#3 Post by Pani »

What does it matter if it'll be
released a few days later or
earlier?

zukunft
Posts: 788
Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 11:06 pm

#4 Post by zukunft »

In Germany the concerts would have been too early. From the promotional point of view, it's very important to release it at the same time ...

User avatar
Pani
Posts: 8208
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:51 am
Contact:

#5 Post by Pani »

OK, I better should've said 'for
me it doesn't really matter'. :wink:

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

#6 Post by Undertaker »

That could mean no single then, considering there is only 5 weeks to go for the original date set for No Time For Tears.

Dave

User avatar
Naughty Zoot
Posts: 1610
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 3:45 am

#7 Post by Naughty Zoot »

Undertaker wrote:That could mean no single then, considering there is only 5 weeks to go for the original date set for No Time For Tears.
Dave
Not necessarily. NTFF could still come out Aug 29. But it does seem odd that there's been no " official " mention of a single so maybe that has fallen through. It is a conundrum ..
I like it here ~~ wherever it is ...

dVTB
Posts: 2714
Joined: Mon 24 Nov 2003, 12:09 am

#8 Post by dVTB »

Naughty Zoot wrote:
Undertaker wrote:That could mean no single then, considering there is only 5 weeks to go for the original date set for No Time For Tears.
Dave
Not necessarily. NTFF could still come out Aug 29. But it does seem odd that there's been no " official " mention of a single so maybe that has fallen through. It is a conundrum ..
6672 is the catalogue number for the new single, as I posted some time ago. Check this page if you like: http://www.cobraside.com/catalog/Mailin ... _2005.html

Or see these pages:
http://www.vibrantsound.com/iserve/barcode/CDR6672
http://www.vibrantsound.com/iserve/barcode/CDRS6672

If this is NOT true, why do two different websites mention this catalogue number seperately?

User avatar
Flaffer
Posts: 3894
Joined: Wed 05 Nov 2003, 4:14 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

#9 Post by Flaffer »

releases are allocated numbers in anticipation of being released, the issuing of catalogue number is no guarantee a single will come out although chances are it will. I think the London DVD single was allocated a number for instance. That vibrantsound website states that the single was produced by Trevor Horn, wonder if he has got involved ?
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.

User avatar
AlfonsoPSB
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 11:47 pm

#10 Post by AlfonsoPSB »

Flaffer wrote: That vibrantsound website states that the single was produced by Trevor Horn, wonder if he has got involved ?
Maybe it means that there could be a single version produced by Trevor Horn. That site also states that the CD2 is enhanced.
Where did they get all that info from?
Last edited by AlfonsoPSB on Fri 22 Jul 2005, 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

MarcoS
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 8:46 pm

#11 Post by MarcoS »

I'm taking this thread to ask something i am very curious about (I dont want to revive what seems like a dead topic).

Whatever happened to the tracks produced by Adam F? Was it only Miracles? I hope there are some more...
"All women become like their mothers. That's their tragedy. Men don't, and that's theirs."
Oscar Wilde

Facebook: Marco Steiz
http://www.myspace.com/numb75

bookshopboy

#12 Post by bookshopboy »

http://popjustice2.proboards48.com/inde ... 1122023581
The new pet shop boys single "NO TIME FOR TEARS" has now been withdrawn from the sale schedule due to record company wanting the POTEMKIM soundtrack album to be released as a
"minor side project".
roll on the new album i say
Also the original promo got withdrawn because for some bizarre reason management didn't want it to come under 'Pet Shop Boys' so it's been changed to 'Neil Tenant: Battleship Potemkim' which surely must piss Chris off.
eh? What's all this about?

User avatar
joncool5
Posts: 1336
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:15 am
Contact:

#13 Post by joncool5 »

I think that 2nd comment is a load of rubbish to be honest!!

One of the crowd
Posts: 4796
Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 3:42 pm

#14 Post by One of the crowd »

Flaffer wrote:releases are allocated numbers in anticipation of being released, the issuing of catalogue number is no guarantee a single will come out although chances are it will. I think the London DVD single was allocated a number for instance. That vibrantsound website states that the single was produced by Trevor Horn, wonder if he has got involved ?
Indeed, London was given a catalogue no.

The Promo CDs were labelled CDRDJ6589 and CDRDJX6589

And dont forget way way back the Pic Disc of West End girls was assigned a cat no : RPD6115 but no one seems to have seen a copy!!

Also, I vaguely remember How Can You Expect To Be Taken Seriously? was also assigned the **R6283 cat no before it got changed to Jealousyand then of course, Streets/Seriously came out with the **R6285 number.

User avatar
AlfonsoPSB
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 11:47 pm

#15 Post by AlfonsoPSB »

joncool5 wrote:I think that 2nd comment is a load of rubbish to be honest!!
Agree!! :x

And about the 1st comment, if EMI wants Potemkin to be released as a "minor side project", why are they making an effort to keep the original release date?

Post Reply