amandote wrote:hey, it's a free world after all - we have the freedom of speech
respect each other
if nickname makes threads that you don't like; don't read them.
it's so easy to blame... look at yourself first, think twice, and so on...
nickname wrote:I think the same about her (and about you) if you ask me, but I think the community hasn't been created to insult other people (I see some of you don't agree with that).
Is it really an insult though? To start thread upon thread about tracks nobody has heard yet is imbecilic behaviour. To be honest, I reply more to your posts than anything else on here because I can't believe you are not on a wind-up.
TRACK 8 TO WIN!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG TRACK 3 IS FIT!!!!!!!!! TRACK 5 IS A MINGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ArseSpanker wrote:Aren't we getting a bit off topic?
Can we talk about track 8 again? After all it should be even better than track 5 on Introspective.
But hey!, Look at Track 5 on Actually, Do you think track 8 will be better than that one?
If you look at the history of track five on PSB albums, I think you'll find that the first letter of each song title when re-arranged spell 'shaodsye'. If you put the term 'shaodsye' into Google a funny thing happens:
Google wrote:Your search - shaodsye - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
* Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
* Try different keywords.
* Try more general keywords.
This is a FUNDAMENTAL error!!!!
What do other people think about this? It can't be a coincidence...
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect or represent those of its author.
ArseSpanker wrote:Aren't we getting a bit off topic?
Can we talk about track 8 again? After all it should be even better than track 5 on Introspective.
But hey!, Look at Track 5 on Actually, Do you think track 8 will be better than that one?
If you look at the history of track five on PSB albums, I think you'll find that the first letter of each song title when re-arranged spell 'shaodsye'. If you put the term 'shaodsye' into Google a funny thing happens:
Google wrote:Your search - shaodsye - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
* Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
* Try different keywords.
* Try more general keywords.
This is a FUNDAMENTAL error!!!!
What do other people think about this? It can't be a coincidence...
I'm sorry to have to tell you this, and I hope you don't freak out, but the last letters of each track 5 song title spell 'acddnekl', and when you put this into Google... woah!
Google wrote:Your search - acddnekl - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
* Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
* Try different keywords.
* Try more general keywords.
There are clearly forces, FUNDAMENTAL forces no less, behind this strangeness. I do hope Nickname never tries to play his speculative, imaginary edition of Fundamental backwards... It would surely spell doom for all of us....
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post do not necessarily reflect or represent those of its author.
ArseSpanker wrote:Aren't we getting a bit off topic?
Can we talk about track 8 again? After all it should be even better than track 5 on Introspective.
But hey!, Look at Track 5 on Actually, Do you think track 8 will be better than that one?
If you look at the history of track five on PSB albums, I think you'll find that the first letter of each song title when re-arranged spell 'shaodsye'. If you put the term 'shaodsye' into Google a funny thing happens:
Google wrote:Your search - shaodsye - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
* Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
* Try different keywords.
* Try more general keywords.
This is a FUNDAMENTAL error!!!!
What do other people think about this? It can't be a coincidence...
