Oh, the fact that trance died in 1998, certainly won't be a reason for PSB not to make a trance trackjamie1978 wrote:Of course it won't be trance. Trance died in 1998, even the PSB's are aware of that much. Anyway, I've heard the song, and you're all wrong. Its actually jazz.
Blue on blue
-
profile790
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue 04 May 2004, 6:40 pm
-
profile790
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue 04 May 2004, 6:40 pm
-
Burj
- jamie1978
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2003, 9:23 am
- jamie1978
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2003, 9:23 am
It certainly has trace leanings, but that mix is 4 years old now, they stated they were sick of house/trance relatively recently (perhaps someone can remember the exact interview date, I can't, but it was within the last year).! wrote:Isn't the horrible PSB extended mix of Here trance?jamie1978 wrote:Of course it won't be trance.
Its actually jazz.![]()
Also, I love the swing version of Can you forgive her?
-
Burj
- jamie1978
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2003, 9:23 am
Well when they commission a remix and it comes back with trance leanings they either have to bin it and waste 10 grand, or live with it.
Remixers do have autonomy, you know.
Anyway, stop being so stupid. Excluding remixes, PSB's have not produced a trance-influenced b-side or album track since FYOG seven years ago.
Remixers do have autonomy, you know.
Anyway, stop being so stupid. Excluding remixes, PSB's have not produced a trance-influenced b-side or album track since FYOG seven years ago.
-
Burj
-
profile790
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue 04 May 2004, 6:40 pm
Still they decided to release this trance remix on Disco 3. They could also have decided NOT to release it. BTW: It was also on the US-edition of Release. On that edition it was even called 'Second Trance remix'.Burj wrote:Erm, what the hell are you talking about, dim skinny f***tard!
They didn't commission B&J, they did if off their own back from the promo 12" acapella. Don't you know anything?
- jamie1978
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2003, 9:23 am
I'm talking about how remixing normally works, not about HAD specifically. Though the logic still applies, as it WAS a remix and the remixers had autonomy.
What is it exactly you are failing to understand here? They have stated recently they are sick of trance/house.
Therefore, its safe to say that given we are NOT talking about a remix, and given that they have said they are sick of house/trance, that you will not see any trance-influenced output from them now or in the near future.
What is it exactly you are failing to understand here? They have stated recently they are sick of trance/house.
Therefore, its safe to say that given we are NOT talking about a remix, and given that they have said they are sick of house/trance, that you will not see any trance-influenced output from them now or in the near future.
-
Burj
Um, Here from D3 has already been mentioned in this very thread not 10 minutes agojamie1978 wrote:Excluding remixes, PSB's have not produced a trance-influenced b-side or album track since FYOG seven years ago.
Repeat: there's no proof IP is a remix, more likely it's a track finished off by Stuart Chrichton in the same way he finished off Miracles, Tomcraft finished off Flamboyant, and Richard X finished off Fugitive.
If there was a true PSB & Elton studio version of this then I'm sure that would be on the single with Minimal, rather than a mere edit of a previously released 'remix'
- jamie1978
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2003, 9:23 am
-
Burj
The bit that says that the Here in question is essentially an album track on D3, and if PSB knew trance died in 1998 then perhaps they might have made the track sound slightly different to what it does?jamie1978 wrote:What part of the two words 'excluding remixes' do you not understand?
And I repeat: there's no proof IP is a remix, yawn.