Always on my mind to be re released
- Actually
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed 20 Sep 2006, 11:52 am
- Contact:
Always on my mind to be re released
Always on my mind is to be re released on 19th November. Could it be a contender for the Christmas number 1 spot as it did 20 years ago ?
Oh, i should have mentioned it is the version by the king himself.
Still, Always on my mind is a such a passionate song sung by whoever.
BMG have certainly got their heads screwed on when it comes to marketing.
Have you seen the Cd singles of Elvis' re released singles in the latest campaign, designed like the original vinyl editions. And we get 10" formats as well.
Oh, i should have mentioned it is the version by the king himself.
Still, Always on my mind is a such a passionate song sung by whoever.
BMG have certainly got their heads screwed on when it comes to marketing.
Have you seen the Cd singles of Elvis' re released singles in the latest campaign, designed like the original vinyl editions. And we get 10" formats as well.
I'm too weak to be strong
-
One of the crowd
- Posts: 4796
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 3:42 pm
Re: Always on my mind to be re released
Elvis' version also reached #13 when first re-issued in May 1997Actually wrote:Always on my mind is to be re released on 19th November. Could it be a contender for the Christmas number 1 spot as it did 20 years ago ?
Oh, i should have mentioned it is the version by the king himself.
Still, Always on my mind is a such a passionate song sung by whoever.
BMG have certainly got their heads screwed on when it comes to marketing.
Have you seen the Cd singles of Elvis' re released singles in the latest campaign, designed like the original vinyl editions. And we get 10" formats as well.
- Riikka
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2007, 8:10 pm
-
Tom Angel
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: Sat 04 Feb 2006, 2:09 pm
I agree, I was TOTALLY misled by this title and have barely been able to concentrate on anything since. And besides, should it not read 'their' song, as opposed to 'that' song?! What business has Elvis got covering a PSB classic years after he is dead?Riikka wrote:You should change the subject, it's misleading. As it's under "Pet Shop Boys Discussion", then I was thinking right away that this news was about THEIR version. What a disappointment! I'm not interested in anyone else's version of that song.
in suits or sequins/or twin sets and pearls
- Riikka
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2007, 8:10 pm
- Actually
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Wed 20 Sep 2006, 11:52 am
- Contact:
-
Parkol
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Thu 29 Dec 2005, 10:52 am
- leesmapman
- Posts: 3575
- Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
- Been thanked: 3 times
- gareth
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:19 pm
- Contact:
That final sentence is a classic!Riikka wrote:You should change the subject, it's misleading. As it's under "Pet Shop Boys Discussion", then I was thinking right away that this news was about THEIR version. What a disappointment! I'm not interested in anyone else's version of that song.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Always_on_My_Mind
Furious angels will bring you back to me
- Radiophonic
- Posts: 5000
- Joined: Sun 29 Apr 2007, 10:14 pm
I see no disrespect about anyone here. Frankly, anyone that posts a provocative message intended to mislead for 'a bit of fun' should expect a strong reaction back.Actually wrote:Show a bit more respect. If it wasn't for the King there would have been no "classic" to cover.
Yes i could have put this thread elsewhere but i thought the title would grab YOUR attention...& guess what it worked.
It's only a bit of fun, concentrate on that.
-
le petit corbusier
- Posts: 2219
- Joined: Tue 20 Mar 2007, 9:42 am
- Riikka
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2007, 8:10 pm
You're right Radiophonic, I have shown no disrespect at all, but I hate mistitled topics which let people think of something that is not true. If you were to write about this on an Elvis forum, it would be completely appropriate. But I don't want to be mislead when the thread is about my favourite PSB track. I don't want to get false hopes.Radiophonic wrote:I see no disrespect about anyone here. Frankly, anyone that posts a provocative message intended to mislead for 'a bit of fun' should expect a strong reaction back.Actually wrote:Show a bit more respect. If it wasn't for the King there would have been no "classic" to cover.
Yes i could have put this thread elsewhere but i thought the title would grab YOUR attention...& guess what it worked.
It's only a bit of fun, concentrate on that.
Everyone has their taste too, but for me the PSB version is the only one I care about. When it has the same melody and same lyrics as the other versions of the song, doesn't mean that I should put my emotions on them as well.


