The Prime Minister

For 'Off Topic' and non-PSB music threads.
Message
Author
User avatar
StevePSB
Site Admin
Posts: 4953
Joined: Wed 08 Jan 2003, 2:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

#31 Post by StevePSB »

Radiophonic wrote:Bring back Maggie. We had a country to be proud of then.
Now that has to be a wind up. Surely?

Me? I'll be dancing on the old witches grave.


StevePSB

User avatar
Deschanel
Posts: 2369
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 7:23 pm

#32 Post by Deschanel »

He does seem a bit heavy. We get frequent BBC newsbursts throughout the day on the public radio station I listen to in New York, and everytime I hear that baritone I think , is that Christopher Hitchens? They sound remarkably alike, but i hope your PM isn't quite as alcoholic as Hitchens, who I like/hate, depending. He seems to write seventeen articles a week here.

Gordon needs a Carla Bruni to jazz it up. probably not.

User avatar
gregf
Posts: 1802
Joined: Fri 08 Dec 2006, 1:58 am
Contact:

#33 Post by gregf »

Ahh, your are right Deschanel. We see him (Hitchens) interviewed over here on
our late night political chat show. There is a resemblance. Hitchins is a bit hard
to pigeon-hole isn't he. I think he supported the Iraq war ?
"Remember Bender, if you do it right, no one is sure you have done anything at all". -God. In Godfellas.

User avatar
glennjridge
Posts: 8205
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm

#34 Post by glennjridge »

he seemed intially for it,I believe he commented on one of the shows like bill mahar or somewhere else and it seems now he is sort of backtracking on that, I think his position now is I dont think he supported the Iraq war per se, but supported fighting al queda/taliban.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9960
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

#35 Post by Patrick Bateman »

If you think Christopher Hitchens is bad, you should see his brother.....

User avatar
Deschanel
Posts: 2369
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 7:23 pm

#36 Post by Deschanel »

I do believe Hitchens and his brother have been feuding for years..

I actually like Hitchens - he's never being boring, and likes to lob verbal grenades into any conversation, which is a godsend- he's a great contrast to the dull , careful , careerist drones in navy suits on Sunday chat shows. And it's hilarious how bullied some of them are by his English accent, but probably it's more his stinging delivery, in his rumbling baronial voice,- he's a master of rhetoric.

On the down side, his rhetoric is 100% in the service of his brand, Christopher Hitchens Contrarianism, Inc. Which is fine- yes he was pro-war in Iraq, because he has friends in Kurdish Iraq who, he says, "I made them a solemn promise". So basically, the most disastrous folly in US history is justified by his drunk-talk in the desert once. He's a well-ensconced , amazingly prolific writer and high-functioning alcoholic on the DC social scene, a star there in what they call, "Hollywood for ugly people", ie, politics.

I like Hitch fine, I just don't take him or his prescriptions seriously, at all.

(And forget his waterboarding- his explicit account of waxing his "back, crack, and sack" in Vanity Fair was totes must-not-read material. TMI, Hitch.)

User avatar
Radiophonic
Posts: 5000
Joined: Sun 29 Apr 2007, 10:14 pm

#37 Post by Radiophonic »

StevePSB wrote:
Radiophonic wrote:Bring back Maggie. We had a country to be proud of then.
Now that has to be a wind up. Surely?

Me? I'll be dancing on the old witches grave.


StevePSB
It was, partly.

But I do remember feeling ashamed of this country before she took office. Then very proud on a international stage after. So I have mixed feelings today.

User avatar
Loins Of London
Posts: 817
Joined: Thu 10 Apr 2008, 10:31 am

#38 Post by Loins Of London »

mariuka wrote:"vaffanculo" is some cursing in Italian! 8)
Figlio di Puttana. :D

User avatar
Loins Of London
Posts: 817
Joined: Thu 10 Apr 2008, 10:31 am

#39 Post by Loins Of London »

Patrick Bateman wrote:Sorry for being a white male, by the way. It appears that the government considers that to be a crime these days. ABSOLUTELY SCANDALOUS.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7474801.stm
The report also says "But if, for example, a headmistress wanted to discriminate in favour of a male teacher to balance an all female team that would be allowed too."

User avatar
Corina
Posts: 2982
Joined: Thu 15 May 2008, 4:31 pm

#40 Post by Corina »

Vaffanculo wrote:
mariuka wrote:"vaffanculo" is some cursing in Italian! 8)
Figlio di Puttana. :D
Sorry, but I just couldn`t resist... :lol:

(btw, I can be nobody`s "figlio"!)

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9960
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

#41 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Vaffanculo wrote:The report also says "But if, for example, a headmistress wanted to discriminate in favour of a male teacher to balance an all female team that would be allowed too."
Ideally a non-white male.....

User avatar
Fugitive1979
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue 31 Oct 2006, 11:05 pm
Contact:

#42 Post by Fugitive1979 »

Patrick Bateman wrote:
Vaffanculo wrote:The report also says "But if, for example, a headmistress wanted to discriminate in favour of a male teacher to balance an all female team that would be allowed too."
Ideally a non-white male.....
:clap:
:| :o

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9960
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

#43 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Deschanel wrote:I do believe Hitchens and his brother have been feuding for years..

I actually like Hitchens - he's never being boring, and likes to lob verbal grenades into any conversation, which is a godsend- he's a great contrast to the dull , careful , careerist drones in navy suits on Sunday chat shows. And it's hilarious how bullied some of them are by his English accent, but probably it's more his stinging delivery, in his rumbling baronial voice,- he's a master of rhetoric.

On the down side, his rhetoric is 100% in the service of his brand, Christopher Hitchens Contrarianism, Inc. Which is fine- yes he was pro-war in Iraq, because he has friends in Kurdish Iraq who, he says, "I made them a solemn promise". So basically, the most disastrous folly in US history is justified by his drunk-talk in the desert once. He's a well-ensconced , amazingly prolific writer and high-functioning alcoholic on the DC social scene, a star there in what they call, "Hollywood for ugly people", ie, politics.

I like Hitch fine, I just don't take him or his prescriptions seriously, at all.

(And forget his waterboarding- his explicit account of waxing his "back, crack, and sack" in Vanity Fair was totes must-not-read material. TMI, Hitch.)
Galloway versus Hitchens was rather fabulous.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-1eYkHEfdw

User avatar
Loins Of London
Posts: 817
Joined: Thu 10 Apr 2008, 10:31 am

#44 Post by Loins Of London »

Patrick Bateman wrote:
Vaffanculo wrote:The report also says "But if, for example, a headmistress wanted to discriminate in favour of a male teacher to balance an all female team that would be allowed too."
Ideally a non-white male.....
Get a tan?

billiejo
Posts: 1124
Joined: Wed 09 Aug 2006, 9:02 am

#45 Post by billiejo »

Well I certainly did not vote for them and those who are squealing have no one but themselves to blame. Obviously they wont get in next time but it makes me shudder to think what else they are going to ban in the meantime :twisted:

Post Reply