Next time New York is bombed and 'only' a couple of hundred people die, I'll expect little media coverage and certainly no response from your armed forces.Colonel Ridge wrote:this talk of disportionate use of power, just really silly politically correct nonsense.it shows just how soft we in the west have become concerning "war"
if your going to commit,you do it with massive power to, in the end...minimize the loss of life of your OWN people,not the other guys.
besides,who decides how many deaths constitute disportionate. we're so soft that a couple hundred deaths in a air bombing attack is now dresden.
Israeli air strikes (MOD WARNING P. 23)
- Patrick Bateman
- Posts: 9957
- Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Israeli air strikes
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
Re: Israeli air strikes
its simple karma.I dont care what country is involved.
hamas launched rockets on Israel after a nice cease fire.....and Israel responded heavily.
regardless of the deaths or lack there of with the hamas attack,they, recieved a responding blow from Israel.and it was heavy.
who said life is fair? they bit off more than they can chew.too bad.
anyways I think even muslim countrys are tired of the palestinians "plight" thankfully.
hamas launched rockets on Israel after a nice cease fire.....and Israel responded heavily.
regardless of the deaths or lack there of with the hamas attack,they, recieved a responding blow from Israel.and it was heavy.
who said life is fair? they bit off more than they can chew.too bad.
anyways I think even muslim countrys are tired of the palestinians "plight" thankfully.
- Danny C
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Sat 05 Feb 2005, 12:19 am
Re: Israeli air strikes
Whyever not?Patrick Bateman wrote:'Israel' doesn't have any right to defend itself
You're not one of these [edited by moderator] who thinks Israel has no right to exist, are you?
Well, if they were targeting the terrorists next door, and they got me by accident, I'd call it "collateral damage".Patrick Bateman wrote:Bit strange to claim they're not murdering anyone - what would you call having bombs dropped on you? Friendly fire? Happy Hanukkah?
- gregf
- Posts: 1802
- Joined: Fri 08 Dec 2006, 1:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Israeli air strikes
Its important to remember there are war hungry conservatives
and progressives trying to bring peace on each side,
and dare I say it, in every forum.
For a decade Israeli conservatives did everything possible
to avoid peace including assasinating Israels prime minister.
By rejecting the Camp David peace accord and destroying
Palestinian moderates, Israel under Likud has made its
own problem by strengthening Hamas.
But in the last few years, Israel has had a moderate
goverment(kadima/Labour) slowly moving toward peace
And it is imperative they stay in power.
Israel did the right thing leaving Gaza. Hamas must do
the right thing and stop the rocket attacks. I think Hamas
has brought this on themselves.
But I equate hatred of Palestinians with hatred of Jews.
It is the same sick attitude. Work for peace. Dont be a
part of the problem.
(entered Very carefully on an iphone
while on summer holidays
)
and progressives trying to bring peace on each side,
and dare I say it, in every forum.
For a decade Israeli conservatives did everything possible
to avoid peace including assasinating Israels prime minister.
By rejecting the Camp David peace accord and destroying
Palestinian moderates, Israel under Likud has made its
own problem by strengthening Hamas.
But in the last few years, Israel has had a moderate
goverment(kadima/Labour) slowly moving toward peace
And it is imperative they stay in power.
Israel did the right thing leaving Gaza. Hamas must do
the right thing and stop the rocket attacks. I think Hamas
has brought this on themselves.
But I equate hatred of Palestinians with hatred of Jews.
It is the same sick attitude. Work for peace. Dont be a
part of the problem.
(entered Very carefully on an iphone
while on summer holidays
"Remember Bender, if you do it right, no one is sure you have done anything at all". -God. In Godfellas.
- GalataPSB
- Posts: 6137
- Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 12:10 pm
Re: Israeli air strikes
Robert Fisk: Leaders lie, civilians die, and lessons of history are ignored
We've got so used to the carnage of the Middle East that we don't care any more – providing we don't offend the Israelis. It's not clear how many of the Gaza dead are civilians, but the response of the Bush administration, not to mention the pusillanimous reaction of Gordon Brown, reaffirm for Arabs what they have known for decades: however they struggle against their antagonists, the West will take Israel's side. As usual, the bloodbath was the fault of the Arabs – who, as we all know, only understand force.
Ever since 1948, we've been hearing this balderdash from the Israelis – just as Arab nationalists and then Arab Islamists have been peddling their own lies: that the Zionist "death wagon" will be overthrown, that all Jerusalem will be "liberated". And always Mr Bush Snr or Mr Clinton or Mr Bush Jnr or Mr Blair or Mr Brown have called upon both sides to exercise "restraint" – as if the Palestinians and the Israelis both have F-18s and Merkava tanks and field artillery. Hamas's home-made rockets have killed just 20 Israelis in eight years, but a day-long blitz by Israeli aircraft that kills almost 300 Palestinians is just par for the course.
The blood-splattering has its own routine. Yes, Hamas provoked Israel's anger, just as Israel provoked Hamas's anger, which was provoked by Israel, which was provoked by Hamas, which ... See what I mean? Hamas fires rockets at Israel, Israel bombs Hamas, Hamas fires more rockets and Israel bombs again and ... Got it? And we demand security for Israel – rightly – but overlook this massive and utterly disproportionate slaughter by Israel. It was Madeleine Albright who once said that Israel was "under siege" – as if Palestinian tanks were in the streets of Tel Aviv.
By last night, the exchange rate stood at 296 Palestinians dead for one dead Israeli. Back in 2006, it was 10 Lebanese dead for one Israeli dead. This weekend was the most inflationary exchange rate in a single day since – the 1973 Middle East War? The 1967 Six Day War? The 1956 Suez War? The 1948 Independence/Nakba War? It's obscene, a gruesome game – which Ehud Barak, the Israeli Defence Minister, unconsciously admitted when he spoke this weekend to Fox TV. "Our intention is to totally change the rules of the game," Barak said.
Exactly. Only the "rules" of the game don't change. This is a further slippage on the Arab-Israeli exchanges, a percentage slide more awesome than Wall Street's crashing shares, though of not much interest in the US which – let us remember – made the F-18s and the Hellfire missiles which the Bush administration pleads with Israel to use sparingly.
Quite a lot of the dead this weekend appear to have been Hamas members, but what is it supposed to solve? Is Hamas going to say: "Wow, this blitz is awesome – we'd better recognise the state of Israel, fall in line with the Palestinian Authority, lay down our weapons and pray we are taken prisoner and locked up indefinitely and support a new American 'peace process' in the Middle East!" Is that what the Israelis and the Americans and Gordon Brown think Hamas is going to do?
Yes, let's remember Hamas's cynicism, the cynicism of all armed Islamist groups. Their need for Muslim martyrs is as crucial to them as Israel's need to create them. The lesson Israel thinks it is teaching – come to heel or we will crush you – is not the lesson Hamas is learning. Hamas needs violence to emphasise the oppression of the Palestinians – and relies on Israel to provide it. A few rockets into Israel and Israel obliges.
Not a whimper from Tony Blair, the peace envoy to the Middle East who's never been to Gaza in his current incarnation. Not a bloody word.
We hear the usual Israeli line. General Yaakov Amidror, the former head of the Israeli army's "research and assessment division" announced that "no country in the world would allow its citizens to be made the target of rocket attacks without taking vigorous steps to defend them". Quite so. But when the IRA were firing mortars over the border into Northern Ireland, when their guerrillas were crossing from the Republic to attack police stations and Protestants, did Britain unleash the RAF on the Irish Republic? Did the RAF bomb churches and tankers and police stations and zap 300 civilians to teach the Irish a lesson? No, it did not. Because the world would have seen it as criminal behaviour. We didn't want to lower ourselves to the IRA's level.
Yes, Israel deserves security. But these bloodbaths will not bring it. Not since 1948 have air raids protected Israel. Israel has bombed Lebanon thousands of times since 1975 and not one has eliminated "terrorism". So what was the reaction last night? The Israelis threaten ground attacks. Hamas waits for another battle. Our Western politicians crouch in their funk holes. And somewhere to the east – in a cave? a basement? on a mountainside? – a well-known man in a turban smiles.
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/co ... 15045.html
We've got so used to the carnage of the Middle East that we don't care any more – providing we don't offend the Israelis. It's not clear how many of the Gaza dead are civilians, but the response of the Bush administration, not to mention the pusillanimous reaction of Gordon Brown, reaffirm for Arabs what they have known for decades: however they struggle against their antagonists, the West will take Israel's side. As usual, the bloodbath was the fault of the Arabs – who, as we all know, only understand force.
Ever since 1948, we've been hearing this balderdash from the Israelis – just as Arab nationalists and then Arab Islamists have been peddling their own lies: that the Zionist "death wagon" will be overthrown, that all Jerusalem will be "liberated". And always Mr Bush Snr or Mr Clinton or Mr Bush Jnr or Mr Blair or Mr Brown have called upon both sides to exercise "restraint" – as if the Palestinians and the Israelis both have F-18s and Merkava tanks and field artillery. Hamas's home-made rockets have killed just 20 Israelis in eight years, but a day-long blitz by Israeli aircraft that kills almost 300 Palestinians is just par for the course.
The blood-splattering has its own routine. Yes, Hamas provoked Israel's anger, just as Israel provoked Hamas's anger, which was provoked by Israel, which was provoked by Hamas, which ... See what I mean? Hamas fires rockets at Israel, Israel bombs Hamas, Hamas fires more rockets and Israel bombs again and ... Got it? And we demand security for Israel – rightly – but overlook this massive and utterly disproportionate slaughter by Israel. It was Madeleine Albright who once said that Israel was "under siege" – as if Palestinian tanks were in the streets of Tel Aviv.
By last night, the exchange rate stood at 296 Palestinians dead for one dead Israeli. Back in 2006, it was 10 Lebanese dead for one Israeli dead. This weekend was the most inflationary exchange rate in a single day since – the 1973 Middle East War? The 1967 Six Day War? The 1956 Suez War? The 1948 Independence/Nakba War? It's obscene, a gruesome game – which Ehud Barak, the Israeli Defence Minister, unconsciously admitted when he spoke this weekend to Fox TV. "Our intention is to totally change the rules of the game," Barak said.
Exactly. Only the "rules" of the game don't change. This is a further slippage on the Arab-Israeli exchanges, a percentage slide more awesome than Wall Street's crashing shares, though of not much interest in the US which – let us remember – made the F-18s and the Hellfire missiles which the Bush administration pleads with Israel to use sparingly.
Quite a lot of the dead this weekend appear to have been Hamas members, but what is it supposed to solve? Is Hamas going to say: "Wow, this blitz is awesome – we'd better recognise the state of Israel, fall in line with the Palestinian Authority, lay down our weapons and pray we are taken prisoner and locked up indefinitely and support a new American 'peace process' in the Middle East!" Is that what the Israelis and the Americans and Gordon Brown think Hamas is going to do?
Yes, let's remember Hamas's cynicism, the cynicism of all armed Islamist groups. Their need for Muslim martyrs is as crucial to them as Israel's need to create them. The lesson Israel thinks it is teaching – come to heel or we will crush you – is not the lesson Hamas is learning. Hamas needs violence to emphasise the oppression of the Palestinians – and relies on Israel to provide it. A few rockets into Israel and Israel obliges.
Not a whimper from Tony Blair, the peace envoy to the Middle East who's never been to Gaza in his current incarnation. Not a bloody word.
We hear the usual Israeli line. General Yaakov Amidror, the former head of the Israeli army's "research and assessment division" announced that "no country in the world would allow its citizens to be made the target of rocket attacks without taking vigorous steps to defend them". Quite so. But when the IRA were firing mortars over the border into Northern Ireland, when their guerrillas were crossing from the Republic to attack police stations and Protestants, did Britain unleash the RAF on the Irish Republic? Did the RAF bomb churches and tankers and police stations and zap 300 civilians to teach the Irish a lesson? No, it did not. Because the world would have seen it as criminal behaviour. We didn't want to lower ourselves to the IRA's level.
Yes, Israel deserves security. But these bloodbaths will not bring it. Not since 1948 have air raids protected Israel. Israel has bombed Lebanon thousands of times since 1975 and not one has eliminated "terrorism". So what was the reaction last night? The Israelis threaten ground attacks. Hamas waits for another battle. Our Western politicians crouch in their funk holes. And somewhere to the east – in a cave? a basement? on a mountainside? – a well-known man in a turban smiles.
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/co ... 15045.html
- Patrick Bateman
- Posts: 9957
- Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Israeli air strikes
You're not one of these [edited by moderator] who thinks it was alright to erase Palestine from the map, are you?Danny C wrote:You're not one of these [edited by moderator] who thinks Israel has no right to exist, are you?
Re: Israeli air strikes
the point made in the article re the RAF in Ireland was a very good one
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.
- Fugitive1979
- Posts: 6135
- Joined: Tue 31 Oct 2006, 11:05 pm
- Contact:
Re: Israeli air strikes
Yes. I don't think it would have been in our best interests to have behaved like Israel in that case.Flaffer wrote:the point made in the article re the RAF in Ireland was a very good one
- Danny C
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Sat 05 Feb 2005, 12:19 am
Re: Israeli air strikes
Is anyone trying to erase Palestine from the map?Patrick Bateman wrote:You're not one of these [edited by moderator] who thinks it was alright to erase Palestine from the map, are you?
- Patrick Bateman
- Posts: 9957
- Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Israeli air strikes
Well the Israelis are certainly having a good try.Danny C wrote:Is anyone trying to erase Palestine from the map?
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
Re: Israeli air strikes
Hamas spokesman on the radio today saying the rocket attacks fired against Israel were done by "Israeli collaborators" and not hamas......
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
Re: Israeli air strikes
well actually theres the problem with your propaganda.Patrick Bateman wrote:Well the Israelis are certainly having a good try.Danny C wrote:Is anyone trying to erase Palestine from the map?
the Israeli have tanks....attack helicopters....long range artillery,armored personnel carriers,fighter bombers...proffesional soldiers.
if they really had any interest at wiping out the palestinians they could at any time.but they temper themselves.
now...however...if the shoe was on the otherfoot and hamas had these things,they would kill every man woman and child in Israel.
- Patrick Bateman
- Posts: 9957
- Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Israeli air strikes
Yeah, kind of like how Hitler 'tempered' himself.glennjridge wrote:the Israeli have tanks....attack helicopters....long range artillery,armored personnel carriers,fighter bombers...proffesional soldiers.
if they really had any interest at wiping out the palestinians they could at any time.but they temper themselves.
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
Re: Israeli air strikes
it just highlights what I'm saying. hitler had the military means to try and exterminate ...and he used it. killed around 6 million jews. the Israeli has the means to wipe out the palestinians ....but they dont.
pointless arguing anyways. protesting for the palestinian plight isnt in vogue anymore.that was so early 90's.
pointless arguing anyways. protesting for the palestinian plight isnt in vogue anymore.that was so early 90's.
- Patrick Bateman
- Posts: 9957
- Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Israeli air strikes
Yes, just like Take That.glennjridge wrote:pointless arguing anyways. protesting for the palestinian plight isnt in vogue anymore.that was so early 90's.