Super-injunctions

For 'Off Topic' and non-PSB music threads.
Message
Author
User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9954
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Super-injunctions

#1 Post by Patrick Bateman »

It is rather amusing spotting how the old media are reporting on the stories that they can't report on.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/t ... itter.html

His fans have taken to Twitter to complain about the silence: "Hey @davidschneider have been missing your comedy – seems like you have been chained to your desk recently!", said one. :lol:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... Volvo.html

But then Hugh’s devotion to wife Lulu is so strong it is understood he is known to fellow thespians as the Ryan Giggs of the showbusiness world, after the famously family-orientated footballer. :shhh:

Dipso
Posts: 3552
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 11:39 pm

Re: Super-injunctions

#2 Post by Dipso »

The last line of that Daily Mail article is hilarious.

Have you seen this?:

http://super-injunction.blogspot.com/
Prick up your ears.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9954
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Super-injunctions

#3 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Dipso wrote:The last line of that Daily Mail article is hilarious.

Have you seen this?:

http://super-injunction.blogspot.com/
:up:

Whilst the shagging stuff is simply tittle-tattle (and who doesn't love a bit of gossip :wink: ) the Andrew Marr case illustrates why these super-injunctions are a bad thing. The jug-eared philanderer's illicit nookie was common news on the internet anyway but it is right that he has now been outed publicly as a hypocritical New Labour stooge. The scandal is the amount of taxpayers' money that funds the duplicitous gargoyle's lifestyle. If I was earning that kind of money for cosying up to New Labour tosspots then I'd have suppressed that story about Firth of Forth and I. :oops:

Bravo, Ian Hislop. :clap: We need more puritanical truth seekers in public life.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9954
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Super-injunctions

#4 Post by Patrick Bateman »


User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

Re: Super-injunctions

#5 Post by Undertaker »

Can Wayne Rooney's be classed as an ''affair''? He's made to sound like everyone else :lol:

Annie Lennox making a shock appearance.

So that's where Didier Drogba caught 'Malaria'

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9954
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Super-injunctions

#6 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Annie Lennox's one is related to her Sapphism. The female in the Drogba one was the same one that was linked to Kevin Nolan; has he got malaria now too? I see that he's out for the rest of the season. :wink:

Nice to see that Robbie Keane can put it in from six inches out off the pitch, if not on it.

Pardew is the new David Pleat.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9954
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Super-injunctions

#7 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Ryan Giggs is now taking legal action against Twitter. :lol: Oh for Christ's sake man, there are lost Amazonian tribes that know you slept with a Premier League bike by now.

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

Re: Super-injunctions

#8 Post by Undertaker »

Prick. Always has been. Is he actually trying to deny any affair, or just trying to stop his name being published?

User avatar
JSDOUVRES
Posts: 2813
Joined: Fri 05 Dec 2003, 1:31 pm

Re: Super-injunctions

#9 Post by JSDOUVRES »

Always has been? Another rant Undertaker? Not as good a player as Modric of course I suppose, Everybody would tell you that!
Man, he should wait until after the Champions league final next week then forget about all the injunction's and stuff, it will soon be forgotten by the beginning of next season if he did. Don't quite get why he's doing all this stuff, just brings more negative publicity doesn't it? Can't be to do with money surely! Anyway, still a legend on the pitch and always will be!!

User avatar
Radiophonic
Posts: 5000
Joined: Sun 29 Apr 2007, 10:14 pm

Re: Super-injunctions

#10 Post by Radiophonic »

Someone should tell this footballer to stop digging a bigger hole ...

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/blogs/wor ... cle/48429/
"Enjoy it while it lasts ... "

Image

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

Re: Super-injunctions

#11 Post by Undertaker »

JSDOUVRES wrote:Always has been? Another rant Undertaker? Not as good a player as Modric of course I suppose, Everybody would tell you that!
Man, he should wait until after the Champions league final next week then forget about all the injunction's and stuff, it will soon be forgotten by the beginning of next season if he did. Don't quite get why he's doing all this stuff, just brings more negative publicity doesn't it? Can't be to do with money surely! Anyway, still a legend on the pitch and always will be!!
I never said he wasn't a good player. Just a prick. I've always admired players who are only ever fit for their country in big games. I just don't like the bloke. Never have done. It's not a rant our kid, so get over it. I think you will find a lot of people dislike the t*** :mrgreen:

User avatar
JSDOUVRES
Posts: 2813
Joined: Fri 05 Dec 2003, 1:31 pm

Re: Super-injunctions

#12 Post by JSDOUVRES »

xx xx is suing Twitter. I can't Imogen why, That's the popular message on twitter at the moment, like it!

User avatar
Fugitive1979
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue 31 Oct 2006, 11:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Super-injunctions

#13 Post by Fugitive1979 »

It's warm today. I'm sweating like Ryan Giggs, watching his wife set-up a Twitter account.
:| :o

User avatar
Hmmm
Posts: 3805
Joined: Sat 06 Dec 2003, 4:47 pm

Re: Super-injunctions

#14 Post by Hmmm »

The mysterious initials CTB = Caught Twitter Bonking
They make a little go along way.. very Minimal but Fundamental.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9954
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Super-injunctions

#15 Post by Patrick Bateman »


Post Reply