Steve Fett wrote:there is a distinct smell of censorship in the air.
...and it smells
That's putting it, er, mildly!
This mysterious new 'moderator' who had suddenly appeared from nowhere and not even introduced themselves with a post won't even let Tom change the title of his own thread!
Steve did post his opinions on the subject, after which you started a childish "war on censorship". I think you might find that when you were joining the forum there were a few rules you were supposed to read, and these included "no pornographic/erotic images" or something similar. Why didn't you decide to leave then? This is a moderated forum, privately owned and hosted, for which you are not paying, unless I have been misinformed. And so if the moderator says something, you may think it's silly, but it's their decision and if you don't like it... well there's always some other forums around. Myself I'm not offended with nudity ("I don't see what's so shocking about a breast" (c) Angelina Jolie) but that doesn't mean it has to be *everywhere*.
And I agree with Hmmm: this is NOT a gay chat forum.
Steve Fett wrote:there is a distinct smell of censorship in the air.
...and it smells
That's putting it, er, mildly!
This mysterious new 'moderator' who had suddenly appeared from nowhere and not even introduced themselves with a post won't even let Tom change the title of his own thread!
Steve Fett wrote:
does anyone remember the cover of the promo copy to "Before" ?!?!?
there are far more sultry vampy girly pictures on here than male ones i've noticed myself...something smells fishy ! hehehe
Yes, or the videos to P'95 and BB (that latter sadly not featuring me )...
Ray wrote:Steve did post his opinions on the subject, after which you started a childish "war on censorship". I think you might find that when you were joining the forum there were a few rules you were supposed to read, and these included "no pornographic/erotic images" or something similar. Why didn't you decide to leave then? This is a moderated forum, privately owned and hosted, for which you are not paying, unless I have been misinformed. And so if the moderator says something, you may think it's silly, but it's their decision and if you don't like it... well there's always some other forums around. Myself I'm not offended with nudity ("I don't see what's so shocking about a breast" (c) Angelina Jolie) but that doesn't mean it has to be *everywhere*.
And I agree with Hmmm: this is NOT a gay chat forum.
that's not the issue.
No erotic/pornographic photos, if those are the rules, then those are the rules, that's fine.
But photos of women "begging for it" are ok, with open mouths, airbrushed nipples and whatnot, while that should also fall under the "no pornographic/erotic images" category.
Looking for love and getting nothing that's worth regretting.
Tennant/Lowe
Ray wrote:Steve did post his opinions on the subject, after which you started a childish "war on censorship". I think you might find that when you were joining the forum there were a few rules you were supposed to read, and these included "no pornographic/erotic images" or something similar. Why didn't you decide to leave then? This is a moderated forum, privately owned and hosted, for which you are not paying, unless I have been misinformed. And so if the moderator says something, you may think it's silly, but it's their decision and if you don't like it... well there's always some other forums around. Myself I'm not offended with nudity ("I don't see what's so shocking about a breast" (c) Angelina Jolie) but that doesn't mean it has to be *everywhere*.
And I agree with Hmmm: this is NOT a gay chat forum.
I don't care for Steve's opinion. I asked for an explanation and the definition of 'pornography' as used on this forum... but of course you'd have to read the other thread to understand that.
I never knew that pornographic was the same as erotic though o.O
Tom wrote:I don't care for Steve's opinion. I asked for an explanation and the definition of 'pornography' as used on this forum... but of course you'd have to read the other thread to understand that.
Oh. Which other thread? I seem to be missing something
Tom wrote:I never knew that pornographic was the same as erotic though o.O
I don't think I said it was, did I? I said "pornographic/erotic" because I can't remember which word was used.
Tom wrote:I don't care for Steve's opinion. I asked for an explanation and the definition of 'pornography' as used on this forum... but of course you'd have to read the other thread to understand that.
Oh. Which other thread? I seem to be missing something
Yes, you really seem to be missing something.
Try the thread entitled 'Definition of 'pornographic'?'
Ray wrote:
Tom wrote:I never knew that pornographic was the same as erotic though o.O
I don't think I said it was, did I? I said "pornographic/erotic" because I can't remember which word was used.
Maybe you should read the rules again?
Just a thought....
Maybe it's just that I don't have to come here to check other people's dicks that makes me unable to really become *ahem* aroused with this subject. Anyway, I've got a naked avatar here showing off his tits, and so far nobody's moderated it.
)...