Middle East revolutions
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
Re: Middle East revolutions
and a ressurection for his step daughter apparently who was "killed" in a 1986 US airstrike.praise Jesus!
Re: Middle East revolutions
well lets be honest Galata if Turkey was strong as the UK, USA and France it would be doing the same.. Great photos though. I think this whole Libya situation could blow up in the Wests face though
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.
Re: Middle East revolutions
I'd be very wary as to the authenticity of the last picture with Obama though, his hands appear transparent, bad photoshop ahoy
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.
-
Parkol
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Thu 29 Dec 2005, 10:52 am
Re: Middle East revolutions
I think UK shouldn't come to Iran with Israel and U.S. Do they really need a war now?
England is a small country and sometimes I don't understand why NATO provoke Middle East...
USA is far away, but Europe is here and all terr acts will be happening in Europe... not in America.
Iran is a big country and they will ask North Korea, China, Syria, India and few Arabian countries attack...
All I know here, in Russia our submarines go to sea and ocean much often, MORE than in 10 times! It's because we don't need other wars here, near our borders... 15 years ago, when everything was very, very bad here, we stopped to make weapon and etc... Last 3-4 years something happened.
When I travel to Europe, I see how people live there, they live perfect, without any wars and Iran. Why are politics are so hungry for the war?
England is a small country and sometimes I don't understand why NATO provoke Middle East...
USA is far away, but Europe is here and all terr acts will be happening in Europe... not in America.
Iran is a big country and they will ask North Korea, China, Syria, India and few Arabian countries attack...
All I know here, in Russia our submarines go to sea and ocean much often, MORE than in 10 times! It's because we don't need other wars here, near our borders... 15 years ago, when everything was very, very bad here, we stopped to make weapon and etc... Last 3-4 years something happened.
When I travel to Europe, I see how people live there, they live perfect, without any wars and Iran. Why are politics are so hungry for the war?
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
Re: Middle East revolutions
people live safe in the west actually because they are so hungry for war historically.
its all about keeping the smart western free democracy way of life sucecssful and keeping the eastern model of a mixture of tyrants and religious wackos in a constant state of failure and ruin.
when you take out a threat, thier future ability is gone and as such abstract...which allows people like you to percieve them as peaceful when in fact they are just militarily neutered from what they really want to do.
its all about keeping the smart western free democracy way of life sucecssful and keeping the eastern model of a mixture of tyrants and religious wackos in a constant state of failure and ruin.
when you take out a threat, thier future ability is gone and as such abstract...which allows people like you to percieve them as peaceful when in fact they are just militarily neutered from what they really want to do.
-
Parkol
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Thu 29 Dec 2005, 10:52 am
Re: Middle East revolutions
I think Iran understands what's happening in the world now. Oil, money and etc... I don't think China will attack USA or Russia now. Why do they need it now? The same thing about Iran... No one wants to fight, everything is quite good, we can travel everywhere, we can discuss about everything and there's no reason to begin any wars. The biggest problem here now - ECOLOGY, that is we MUST think of. We must think about animals and plants now. East and Asia are not really big fan of NATO, also as Russia and as you see Arabian world is getting stronger and thy will not fight as we used to think. many of them live in Europe and they will fight inside our countries. I can tell you many, many things about Chechnya or Kavkaz... I think NATO shouldn't disturb Arabian world. All those revolutions lead to another war.
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
Re: Middle East revolutions
china wont attack the US ever. that would be like my credit card company I owe lots of money to firebombing the company I work for.
-
Parkol
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Thu 29 Dec 2005, 10:52 am
Re: Middle East revolutions
Who knows... Remember what Germany said in 1938-39... Poland, France, Russia and german officers worked in the USSR as pilots and etc.glennjridge wrote:china wont attack the US ever. that would be like my credit card company I owe lots of money to firebombing the company I work for.
Re: Middle East revolutions
Not really the best analogy, China has very cleverly kept it's growth under control and grown slowly but steadily, within the next 20 years it will likely surpass USA and Japan economically and the USA militarily, eventually becoming the worlds superpower, India is following a similar but less noticeable path.glennjridge wrote:china wont attack the US ever. that would be like my credit card company I owe lots of money to firebombing the company I work for.
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.
- glennjridge
- Posts: 8205
- Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm
Re: Middle East revolutions
nah its a good analogy. we owe them money, they want the money,they cant attack us economically or militarily as its a lose lose for them.every other product here says made in china. we're all locked in a death embrace like a blood sucker sucking on a blood sucker.
by the time china supasses us militarily it will be pointless.we'll all have pilotless aircraft...pilotless vehicals,all of us have nuclear weapons.. its just not going to happen.theres nothing in it for anyone.the day of war between superpowers is gone.
the US will still be a world leader no matter chinas status as China is essencially one of an authoritarian regime.I dont think that has much of a place...credibility or staying power as a world leader/superpower.
by the time china supasses us militarily it will be pointless.we'll all have pilotless aircraft...pilotless vehicals,all of us have nuclear weapons.. its just not going to happen.theres nothing in it for anyone.the day of war between superpowers is gone.
the US will still be a world leader no matter chinas status as China is essencially one of an authoritarian regime.I dont think that has much of a place...credibility or staying power as a world leader/superpower.