Batman shooting

For 'Off Topic' and non-PSB music threads.
Message
Author
User avatar
Your Funny Uncle
Posts: 2143
Joined: Wed 08 Jan 2003, 1:55 am

Re: Batman shooting

#46 Post by Your Funny Uncle »

Eldritch wrote:Many people have complained about Bane's plot -- why not just blow away Gotham right away? But the whole point is to torture Batman: let him see how his beloved city descends into chaos and only after blow it away. For me the villain's plot was by fatr the best and most horrifying of all the movies.
I'd say that torturing Bruce Wayne is not the whole point actually. Another reason is to fulfil Ra's Al Ghul's legacy; His original plan had Gotham descending into chaos due to the vaporised toxin. The aim of The League of Shadows was to never simply to destroy the city but instead they wanted to demonstrate its corruption to the world by making it turn on itself. As such it was not enough simply to blow the place up and this was a different means to a similar end.
We are star stuff which has taken its destiny into its own hands. The loom of time and space works the most astonishing transformations of matter. We are a way for the universe to know itself.

Eldritch
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am

Re: Batman shooting

#47 Post by Eldritch »

Pet Shop Girl wrote:The movie storyline is weak. The point is was the weakest of the three movies. But was meant to be dark, that is the way Nolan's movies are. I removed spoilers to be honest I would think that whoever wanted to see it would have seen it by now.

Moving forward to another Batman movie with Robin in the next one.
It's good of you to remove the spoilers, but I can't help feeling that this "whoever wanted to see it would have seen it by now" attitude is wrecking all our popular culture. How long did it write to direct Dark Knight Rises? At least two years. And now after ten days it should be gone and forgotten. The unfashionable ambition of Nolan is to make movies which won't be dissected and forgotten in ten days. He has his flaws -- he is very austere and technical wiith no eye for eroticism of any kind -- but he is a name to watch for. He makes movies which don't make us go "moving forward to the next one" but to re-watch the older ones and see all the allusions to Greek mythology and classic literature, all the stuff that the modern audiences are too thick to get, because they are always looking forward to the next movie with Robin in it.
Click click drone

Palpatine
Posts: 1900
Joined: Sat 27 Mar 2004, 5:39 pm

Re: Batman shooting

#48 Post by Palpatine »

Speaking of spoilers, I remeber Gene Siskel revealing the secret of The Crying Game on Siskel & Ebert the week the movie premiered. There was a huge backlash.

User avatar
glennjridge
Posts: 8205
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:28 pm

Re: Batman shooting

#49 Post by glennjridge »

ok I saw it I thought it rocked. I thought the ending was really good.although I thought they could have had a better catwoman.I just find whats her name a bit bland. she has a rockin body but yet somehow I knew she was going to be a letdown.

oh btw its so nice of people here to be worried about people seeing spoilers in this thread. but I must have missed them so I was ok there.I hope they keep cranking out these superhero movies.its funny though how amid the awesome ones like batman,the avengers and thor there are always the fantastic four and green lanterns.
I find iron man to not live up to the hype though somehow.

User avatar
Pet Shop Girl
Posts: 3610
Joined: Thu 10 Aug 2006, 8:34 pm

Re: Batman shooting

#50 Post by Pet Shop Girl »

Eldritch, to be honest this thread is about the shooting that occured that night before it opened up in the US. This thread title is Batman shooting. So everyone has gone off course here. Anyway, Christopher Nolan won't be directing anymore Batman movies so he is moving on. Those people that have seen it may see the hints about a possible next Batman movie.

User avatar
Your Funny Uncle
Posts: 2143
Joined: Wed 08 Jan 2003, 1:55 am

Re: Batman shooting

#51 Post by Your Funny Uncle »

glennjridge wrote: its funny though how amid the awesome ones like batman,the avengers and thor there are always the fantastic four and green lanterns.
You need a director who understands that the big set pieces and spectacle are necessary but not enough. You need to inject some intelligence into the movie. Although they are different in their approach Christopher Nolan and Joss Whedon both get this.
We are star stuff which has taken its destiny into its own hands. The loom of time and space works the most astonishing transformations of matter. We are a way for the universe to know itself.

Eldritch
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am

Re: Batman shooting

#52 Post by Eldritch »

I think I've had my fill of superhero movies, thank you. I liked Raimi's Spiderman trilogy, but nothing I have seen or heard of the new movie suggests that there's anything going on there we haven't already seen. Joss Whedon is a television genius, but Avengers was an impossible project: too many heroes, too much backstory, crap villains -- it all left me with a headache. As for Batman, God help him who has to reboot him. Nolan's masterstroke was making it all "real": sure it wasn't exacly realism as we know it, but there was nothing supernatural or outlandish about anything. The Joker was a sociopath, not somebody who had fallen into a poison barrel -- and so on. But that has already been done, so what next? And I just am not really interested in all the other heroes.
Click click drone

User avatar
daveid
Posts: 3895
Joined: Sat 11 Feb 2006, 8:38 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Batman shooting

#53 Post by daveid »

Batman shooting?

When will it wrap?

User avatar
Fugitive1979
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue 31 Oct 2006, 11:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Batman shooting

#54 Post by Fugitive1979 »

Pet Shop Girl wrote:Eldritch, to be honest this thread is about the shooting that occured that night before it opened up in the US. This thread title is Batman shooting. So everyone has gone off course here.
There's not much more that can be said about the shooting, that hasn't already been said; Without dragging out all the old cliches, associated with terrible events.

Anyway, did somebody mention Maggie Gyllenhaal? :drool:
:| :o

Post Reply