How did Phil Oakey got involved?

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
artistinmass
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2016, 12:47 pm
Contact:

How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#1 Post by artistinmass »

Does anyone know the background story to Phil Oakey's involvement with This used to be the future?
When the song was written, did they have him in mind?

User avatar
Pod
Posts: 2846
Joined: Wed 27 May 2015, 11:07 pm
Contact:

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#2 Post by Pod »

In Literally 34 pages 8-9 it discusses this. To cut a long story short, when yes was released the psb wanted to release an album of instrumentals of the songs. Farrow exclaimed "like that human league album love and dancing'. And the idea was set. This used to be the future was originally on the album between king of rome and pandemonium but the boys felt the album was too long. It doesnt suggest they had him in mind when it was written.
Just for the sake of it, make sure you're always frowning. :|
It shows the world that you've got substance and depth.

User avatar
DJ Pat
Posts: 1481
Joined: Sun 21 Aug 2005, 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#3 Post by DJ Pat »

I read somewhere that Oakey was working in a nearby studio, they got talking and they thought it'd be a good idea

Disco.
Posts: 2468
Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
Contact:

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#4 Post by Disco. »

They sent him an email.

Tom Angel
Posts: 3481
Joined: Sat 04 Feb 2006, 2:09 pm

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#5 Post by Tom Angel »

They were going to ask Bernard Sumner weren't they-

Utterly LOVE this track. File with Fugitive - as in , why the HELL was it not on the parent album??
in suits or sequins/or twin sets and pearls

User avatar
the8thark
Posts: 428
Joined: Tue 02 Nov 2010, 5:29 am
Contact:

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#6 Post by the8thark »

Tom Angel wrote:They were going to ask Bernard Sumner weren't they-

Utterly LOVE this track. File with Fugitive - as in , why the HELL was it not on the parent album??
My best guess is apart from the album too long issue, the track just does not fit with the album's theme. Just like After The Event does not fit. The most amazing track (which I think After The Event is) does not always make the cut. It can be too good and overshadow the rest of the album, make the album too long, or not fit with the album theme or a host of other reasons.

I guess After The Event cound have replaced the god aweful Legacy though. But I do think The Way I Used To Be is the perfect ending to the album so Legacy is on permanent skip for me. A little off topic but I think Fundamental suffered from this too. Indefinite Leave To Remain is a great ending track. Integral is an amazing song though, just not album ending material.

User avatar
vincenzosz
Posts: 835
Joined: Thu 05 Mar 2009, 4:43 pm
Contact:

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#7 Post by vincenzosz »

the8thark wrote:
Tom Angel wrote:They were going to ask Bernard Sumner weren't they-

Utterly LOVE this track. File with Fugitive - as in , why the HELL was it not on the parent album??
My best guess is apart from the album too long issue, the track just does not fit with the album's theme. Just like After The Event does not fit. The most amazing track (which I think After The Event is) does not always make the cut. It can be too good and overshadow the rest of the album, make the album too long, or not fit with the album theme or a host of other reasons.

I guess After The Event cound have replaced the god aweful Legacy though. But I do think The Way I Used To Be is the perfect ending to the album so Legacy is on permanent skip for me. A little off topic but I think Fundamental suffered from this too. Indefinite Leave To Remain is a great ending track. Integral is an amazing song though, just not album ending material.

I agree with everything you said up until Integral. Are you kidding me? It's a fantastic ending. I'd go so far as to say it's the best closing track on any of their albums. Fits the theme and the sound of the album perfectly and gives a whopper of a finale!

Please tell me your reasons for this [outrageois claim]. ;P

User avatar
DJ Pat
Posts: 1481
Joined: Sun 21 Aug 2005, 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#8 Post by DJ Pat »

As for Integral, it's a thought provoking song.

...slightly off topic but...

Last year my friend was being followed around the supermarket by some bored security guy. I asked him why he did this as he was a regular customer.

His reply was ''so you have a guilty conscience then?''
I replied that it wasn't a police state, and he said ''Yes it is''

I called him a ''fat lazy c**t and he should get a life, and he's just a loser working for the minimum wage''

User avatar
daveid
Posts: 3899
Joined: Sat 11 Feb 2006, 8:38 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#9 Post by daveid »

the8thark wrote:
Tom Angel wrote:They were going to ask Bernard Sumner weren't they-

Utterly LOVE this track. File with Fugitive - as in , why the HELL was it not on the parent album??
My best guess is apart from the album too long issue, the track just does not fit with the album's theme. Just like After The Event does not fit. The most amazing track (which I think After The Event is) does not always make the cut. It can be too good and overshadow the rest of the album, make the album too long, or not fit with the album theme or a host of other reasons.

I guess After The Event cound have replaced the god aweful Legacy though. But I do think The Way I Used To Be is the perfect ending to the album so Legacy is on permanent skip for me. A little off topic but I think Fundamental suffered from this too. Indefinite Leave To Remain is a great ending track. Integral is an amazing song though, just not album ending material.
After the event wasn't recorded for Yes though. It was written durinf the Fundy era and completed specifically for a Yes b side.

Tom Angel
Posts: 3481
Joined: Sat 04 Feb 2006, 2:09 pm

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#10 Post by Tom Angel »

I have to admit to initially hating Legacy with the rest, but it's actually a pretty grand song, and a perfect end to an album. It's a grower.
in suits or sequins/or twin sets and pearls

Nervously
Posts: 322
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2012, 12:10 pm
Contact:

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#11 Post by Nervously »

Legacy isn't a huge favourite of mine but I like it and I've never skipped it, which I can't say for lots of the other songs on the album. No idea why people slag it off so much on this forum.

This used to be the future should have replaced Vulnerable, or they could have just added it and made peace with the album being "too long".

User avatar
lucienchardon
Posts: 1127
Joined: Thu 08 Jan 2004, 8:22 am

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#12 Post by lucienchardon »

Tom Angel wrote:They were going to ask Bernard Sumner weren't they-

Utterly LOVE this track. File with Fugitive - as in , why the HELL was it not on the parent album??
Totally agree with you!

User avatar
DJ Pat
Posts: 1481
Joined: Sun 21 Aug 2005, 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#13 Post by DJ Pat »

Neil jus wouldn't sound right singing this but there must have been a demo of some kind

User avatar
dynamobjornen
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri 10 May 2013, 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#14 Post by dynamobjornen »

Tom Angel wrote:I have to admit to initially hating Legacy with the rest, but it's actually a pretty grand song, and a perfect end to an album. It's a grower.
It is indeed grand. Always thought it was great and a perfect ending to Yes. I love This used to be the future, but I think they did the right thing when they didnt include it on the propper album. I dont think it would have fitted in very well. I love Oakeys part, his voice suits it perfectly.
"Sometimes someone gets upset doesn't hear the laughter takes it as a threat".

User avatar
Effen Vida
Posts: 718
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 4:17 pm

Re: How did Phil Oakey got involved?

#15 Post by Effen Vida »

Had completely forgotten about this song.
Just played it four times on the bounce.
In terms of 'hidden gems' it's up there with Miserablism for me.

Post Reply