Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
Adding a bassline to a song, interestingly, wouldn’t usually translate into a songwriting credit.
Woof.
- onzio
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 12:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
That's correct. the bassline is part of the arrangement and not of the writing.Dog wrote: Tue 01 Jun 2021, 10:04 pm Adding a bassline to a song, interestingly, wouldn’t usually translate into a songwriting credit.
To get writing credits you have to:
collaborate to the harmony of the track, i.e. chord sequence
collaborate to the melody, sequence of notes that identify sung or instrumental parts
collaborate to the lyrics
A bass line usually is a rythmic repetition with more or less variations on the root note of the chord.
It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
The Onzio on Spotify
The Onzio on YouTube
Expressing passion, explaining pain
This is my kind of music
The Onzio on YouTube
Expressing passion, explaining pain
This is my kind of music
- Spittingcat
- Posts: 1420
- Joined: Thu 27 Sep 2012, 11:11 am
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
KLF's "The Manual" explains all this stuff really well... a fun read as well.
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 4094
- Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
Greetings,
Retro.
So, if someone wanted... they could totally rip off the drum pattern and bassline from say, Blue Monday or West-End Girls, and that's totally allowable?onzio wrote: Thu 03 Jun 2021, 9:02 am It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
Retro.
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
Well the bass can play the melody as well. I think Onzio refers to an underlying bassline which doesn't perform the melody.retrofuturist wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 6:43 am Greetings,
So, if someone wanted... they could totally rip off the drum pattern and bassline from say, Blue Monday or West-End Girls, and that's totally allowable?onzio wrote: Thu 03 Jun 2021, 9:02 am It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
Retro.![]()
It's understandable that Chris didn't receive writing credit but why didn't he get a performing credit?
----
You've got me all wrong
You've got me all wrong
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
Maybe he didn’t play it on the record. Presumably it was programmed.telys wrote:Well the bass can play the melody as well. I think Onzio refers to an underlying bassline which doesn't perform the melody.retrofuturist wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 6:43 am Greetings,
So, if someone wanted... they could totally rip off the drum pattern and bassline from say, Blue Monday or West-End Girls, and that's totally allowable?onzio wrote: Thu 03 Jun 2021, 9:02 am It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
Retro.![]()
It's understandable that Chris didn't receive writing credit but why didn't he get a performing credit?
Woof.
-
Parkol
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Thu 29 Dec 2005, 10:52 am
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
Dissapointed
I listen to this song more often than others. I do not know why. An absolutely unique effect. You can listen to it constantly. Without Tennant, this song would be just a pass.
I listen to this song more often than others. I do not know why. An absolutely unique effect. You can listen to it constantly. Without Tennant, this song would be just a pass.
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
I think it's one of the most gorgeous, dreamy, summery songs of all time. From the lyrics to the instrumentation and arrangement, it's just perfection. I mean, just listen to those harmonies!Parkol wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 9:39 am Dissapointed
I listen to this song more often than others. I do not know why. An absolutely unique effect. You can listen to it constantly. Without Tennant, this song would be just a pass.
A blues would be in B flat, pain defining wisdom,
but the soul is in the high hat, programmed in the system.
but the soul is in the high hat, programmed in the system.
- onzio
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 12:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
It is very borderline, that is what courts and judges are for.retrofuturist wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 6:43 am Greetings,
So, if someone wanted... they could totally rip off the drum pattern and bassline from say, Blue Monday or West-End Girls, and that's totally allowable?onzio wrote: Thu 03 Jun 2021, 9:02 am It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
Retro.![]()
If it is recognizable probably you can get into trouble.
For the drum track the problem is when you sample it without permission. If you recreate it with your legitimate samples it is almost impossible to be charged with plagiarism.
The West End girls bassline is very peculiar, and probably could be considered a melody line. The Blue Monday one has been used on many records and no one credited NO. Oh also a chord sequence couldn't be copyrighted, if not together with its melody.
The Onzio on Spotify
The Onzio on YouTube
Expressing passion, explaining pain
This is my kind of music
The Onzio on YouTube
Expressing passion, explaining pain
This is my kind of music
-
bongsteve
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2007, 3:21 am
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
It really is a fantastic song. Hopeful that one day PSB will play it on tour.Parkol wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 9:39 am Dissapointed
I listen to this song more often than others. I do not know why. An absolutely unique effect. You can listen to it constantly. Without Tennant, this song would be just a pass.
-
bongsteve
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2007, 3:21 am
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
Has there ever been a good quality recording of electronic live? Everything I've found has pretty much been very bad audience bootlegs.
-
JK1974
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon 15 Jul 2024, 4:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
I recently uploaded the documentation "Pet Shop Boys - A popumentary" from MTV Europe in 1993. There is also a part where Electronic is interviewed: https://youtu.be/Vu6RmGzuaFw?t=732&si=f5vwg_Zin2m3a5EO.
In the end, Bernard Sumner says: "In fact I suggested, that they brought Chris down. They bringt Chris down. And: Bummer, bummer."
Since I am not a native speaker, I had problems understanding this part and give a proper German translation. Asking Google Translate or Deepl regarding "bringing sth./somebody down" I get the impression that it means that Chris should not be part of the collaboration (as Neil initially asked for it). So it was bad luck for him.
But in the next sequence, Chris says that they have a great sense of humor.
Or does "to bring Chris down" mean in this context, that he is also brought down to the studio and it is "bad luck" for Neil that Electronic also wanted Chris to take part in the collaboration? After the comment of Chris, Stephen Hague says that "Neil is Neil", "He is a special kind of person" etc.
In the end, Bernard Sumner says: "In fact I suggested, that they brought Chris down. They bringt Chris down. And: Bummer, bummer."
Since I am not a native speaker, I had problems understanding this part and give a proper German translation. Asking Google Translate or Deepl regarding "bringing sth./somebody down" I get the impression that it means that Chris should not be part of the collaboration (as Neil initially asked for it). So it was bad luck for him.
But in the next sequence, Chris says that they have a great sense of humor.
Or does "to bring Chris down" mean in this context, that he is also brought down to the studio and it is "bad luck" for Neil that Electronic also wanted Chris to take part in the collaboration? After the comment of Chris, Stephen Hague says that "Neil is Neil", "He is a special kind of person" etc.
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
They mean "bring Chris along". The last part is a bit odd because I'm not sure if Bernard is saying they DID bring Chris or that they did not. Not sure "Bummer Bummer" is the actual right words said by Bernard there either but could be. "Bummer" is usually a word for being sad or casually upset - some use the word "Downer".
It is all a bit strange in that interview, but Bernard does say some obtuse things from time to time too, usually quite tongue in cheek.
It is all a bit strange in that interview, but Bernard does say some obtuse things from time to time too, usually quite tongue in cheek.
- petshopgrrl
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Wed 03 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
Yeah, I think it's a mistake. The whole transcript is having trouble keeping up with the disparate accents.* It's hard to hear because of the music but it doesn't sound as though Bernard IS bummed out by having Chris come along. If anything, it sounds more like... "Whammo bammo"...? Which would be a good thing? He's definitely smiling at the end of it.JK1974 wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024, 2:25 pm I recently uploaded the documentation "Pet Shop Boys - A popumentary" from MTV Europe in 1993. There is also a part where Electronic is interviewed: https://youtu.be/Vu6RmGzuaFw?t=732&si=f5vwg_Zin2m3a5EO.
In the end, Bernard Sumner says: "In fact I suggested, that they brought Chris down. They bringt Chris down. And: Bummer, bummer."
Thanks for pointing this out - great documentary! I'm laughing at the way they keep spinning around and sneaking awkward looks at what the other is doing.
* ETA: For example, "flight on the water bridge" at 15.02 should read "fly on the wall approach"!
For your own good, call me tonight.
Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error
Interesting now I have watched it through.
Agree it's "Whammo bammo!"
Chris stuff about U2 and a Berlin album was, umm, Interesting, considering Hotspot and Elysium. Never say never I guess.
Agree it's "Whammo bammo!"
Chris stuff about U2 and a Berlin album was, umm, Interesting, considering Hotspot and Elysium. Never say never I guess.