Yes it was Paul Simon. Behaviour sold more than 60,000 copies that week, normally enough, at that time to guarantee top billing, but Paul Simon sold 80,000 copies ( Music Week data)MartinWright66 wrote: Tue 14 May 2024, 3:04 pm Add Paul Simon to that list too.
Bloody "The Rhythm of the Saints". At least I *think* that's what stopped Behaviour from hitting top spot.
"Dancing Star": #1 (Official Physical Singles Chart/Official Singles Sales Chart)
-
Disco.
- Posts: 2477
- Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: "Dancing Star": #1 (Official Physical Singles Chart/Official Singles Sales Chart)
- Ramzy
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 2:46 pm
Re: "Dancing Star": #1 (Official Physical Singles Chart/Official Singles Sales Chart)
Can that really be true? 60k would surely make it the best album opening of their career - didn't Very do something like 35-40 in week 1 or have I imagined that? I thought the narrative around Behaviour was that it had sold relatively poorly but 60k would have given it a silver certification in week of release - if not sooner, because certifications are for copies shipped to retail rather than sold.Disco. wrote: Tue 14 May 2024, 4:39 pmYes it was Paul Simon. Behaviour sold more than 60,000 copies that week, normally enough, at that time to guarantee top billing, but Paul Simon sold 80,000 copies ( Music Week data)MartinWright66 wrote: Tue 14 May 2024, 3:04 pm Add Paul Simon to that list too.
Bloody "The Rhythm of the Saints". At least I *think* that's what stopped Behaviour from hitting top spot.
I must disengage your recreational music.
- MartinWright66
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed 29 Nov 2017, 11:22 am
- Contact:
Re: "Dancing Star": #1 (Official Physical Singles Chart/Official Singles Sales Chart)
If it is true, isn't it funny how a difference of 20,000 copies sold in a week, whilst admittedly a lot, can affect the 'narrative' (hate that term, but sue me) of an album's success? I remember people saying how 'Behaviour' was a bit of a flop, or at least a disappointment sales-wise. I wonder how it would have been regarded if it had been released a week before/after and hit #1? Don't tell me that people don't buy records when a band has momentum - I reckon it would have sold more in the following weeks be virtue of being #1, and historically would be considered a hit record (which it is, if you consider PSB's overall sales per album).