National Television Awards

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
tottenhammattspurs
Posts: 4720
Joined: Sat 04 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm

Re: National Television Awards

#61 Post by tottenhammattspurs »

Has anyone considered the fact that his publisher has dropped him is just because his books are a bit shit?
is is and isnt isnt

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 3586
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: National Television Awards

#62 Post by leesmapman »

My girlfriend thinks his books are creepy so this news comes not a surprise for her.

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9965
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: National Television Awards

#63 Post by Patrick Bateman »

tottenhammattspurs wrote: Mon 22 Dec 2025, 10:45 am Has anyone considered the fact that his publisher has dropped him is just because his books are a bit shit?
Nah, it's been an open secret what he's like for years. The only thing keeping it out of the public domain has been expensive lawyers. Like a lot of 'national treasures', the truth rarely comes out until they die, if at all.

User avatar
jasonjohn
Posts: 3080
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 12:10 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: National Television Awards

#64 Post by jasonjohn »

Thought they explicitly said because of his behaviour towards women staff?

They haven't reported him to police, from what I read? Yet a company does not usually give up an income stream over nothing? Maybe there were lawsuits on the horizon?

Always resented how he seemed to steal Roald Dahl's style, not that I ever read more than a page.

I understand the humour of Little Britain, but it's hard to enjoy bc he always took it to the cheapest places. The show probably had a season on content at most.

User avatar
Future Lover
Posts: 1163
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#65 Post by Future Lover »

jasonjohn wrote: Mon 22 Dec 2025, 10:07 am Wanting to protect women's spaces isn't hateful
Well, this is a massive strawman compared to actual hateful bigotry Frances is spreading. It's always "protect women" or "protect children" as a convenient excuse to stomp on others, while an actual paedo is running the States, and a complete erasure of trans people is happening. Please, do inform yourself on this, and by that, I mean, just take a cursory look at her twitter account, it's at least 30-50% of stuff she's posting. f*** JK Rowling and Graham Linehan and their whole hateful clique.

Nickname
Posts: 7893
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 2:52 pm

Re: National Television Awards

#66 Post by Nickname »

Future Lover wrote: Mon 22 Dec 2025, 12:59 pm
jasonjohn wrote: Mon 22 Dec 2025, 10:07 am Wanting to protect women's spaces isn't hateful
Well, this is a massive strawman compared to actual hateful bigotry Frances is spreading. It's always "protect women" or "protect children" as a convenient excuse to stomp on others, while an actual paedo is running the States, and a complete erasure of trans people is happening. Please, do inform yourself on this, and by that, I mean, just take a cursory look at her twitter account, it's at least 30-50% of stuff she's posting. f*** JK Rowling and Graham Linehan and their whole hateful clique.


Hatred is part of the human being and everyone can try to take away other people's rights if they have the chance. It's a matter of power (some men hate women, some women hate men, some straight people hate gay people, some gay people hate straight people, some people hate trans people and viceversa, etc). Anyone can discriminate other people in some way or another if they have an option.

Now in Spain, women have by far more rights than men. Spain is the country of the UE with more radical femist laws. Some of them go so far than no country in Europe has adopted them.

In schools you can appreciate how feminism is putting the blame on boys treating them like they were evil privileged sexist men.

That's why Spaniards are getting more affinity for right extreme political partys than ever. Being probably one of the most leftist countries in the world, probably the most letist country in Europe and being the country with bigger economic increase of the world in the last years.

OakeyDokey
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun 04 Oct 2020, 10:05 pm
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#67 Post by OakeyDokey »

tottenhammattspurs wrote: Mon 22 Dec 2025, 10:45 am Has anyone considered the fact that his publisher has dropped him is just because his books are a bit shit?
Shit made of gold that props-up Harper Collins. Which means he must be a right wrong 'un if they're happy to sacrifice millions of pounds income from future books.

User avatar
thomashenry
Posts: 397
Joined: Fri 05 Mar 2004, 12:23 am

Re: National Television Awards

#68 Post by thomashenry »

Future Lover wrote: Sun 21 Dec 2025, 1:53 pm Considering they've blocked me on Instagram for expressing disappointment in the perpetual re-casting of Frances Barber, they appear to take great pride in their problematic friendships. I guess they think everyone is cancelled in some way, so why care. Being friends with someone in their private life is perfectly fine - choosing who you highlight professionally and who you put your name behind is another thing completely.
They blocked me as well the other month when I asked if they were going to express a view on the situation in Gaza, given their strong stand on Ukraine. Literally just asked that and was blocked.

I think Neil is probably something of an Israel sympathizer, in the past he's justified playing there by saying Israel isn't an apartheid state etc.
just a bad loser

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#69 Post by markus »

thomashenry wrote: Mon 22 Dec 2025, 5:50 pm
Future Lover wrote: Sun 21 Dec 2025, 1:53 pm Considering they've blocked me on Instagram for expressing disappointment in the perpetual re-casting of Frances Barber, they appear to take great pride in their problematic friendships. I guess they think everyone is cancelled in some way, so why care. Being friends with someone in their private life is perfectly fine - choosing who you highlight professionally and who you put your name behind is another thing completely.
They blocked me as well the other month when I asked if they were going to express a view on the situation in Gaza, given their strong stand on Ukraine. Literally just asked that and was blocked.

I think Neil is probably something of an Israel sympathizer, in the past he's justified playing there by saying Israel isn't an apartheid state etc.
What if he thinks they're all wrong, is that not allowed in our society anymore? Gaza = another living museum fueled by idiotic bigotry.

Vintage Youth
Posts: 587
Joined: Sat 20 Apr 2024, 9:56 pm
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#70 Post by Vintage Youth »

Ye Olde 'Walliams is innocent until proven guilty', doesn't feel very safe-spacey for women, who have been voicing concern about him for years. I wouldn't want to be within a country mile of him, or Barber.

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#71 Post by markus »

Once, when I was late for work, I took a taxi — just the first one available. The driver appeared to be an elderly man dressed as a woman, with black hair that may have been a wig and some worn second-hand clothes.
When I paid by card, he didn’t use the usual card reader. Instead, he pulled out an older device and copied my card details. I became suspicious and cancelled my card as soon as I got out.
Some time later, there was a news report about a cross-dressing murderer who had killed a taxi driver and then driven around in the victim’s car.

User avatar
Future Lover
Posts: 1163
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#72 Post by Future Lover »

How is this relevant to the discussion in any way?

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#73 Post by markus »

Future Lover wrote: Tue 23 Dec 2025, 8:39 pm How is this relevant to the discussion in any way?
J.K. Rowling and Frances Barber are accused of transphobia, just trying to read their minds a bit, why are they talking about womens safety?

User avatar
Future Lover
Posts: 1163
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#74 Post by Future Lover »

Well, a clearly mad-looking person in a wig is quite literally not the same as a trans woman. Choose your words wisely, unless you're implying there's an equivalence there. They're not "accused of transphobia", they ARE transphobic.

User avatar
markus
Posts: 1678
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:17 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: National Television Awards

#75 Post by markus »

Future Lover wrote: Tue 23 Dec 2025, 9:02 pm Well, a clearly mad-looking person in a wig is quite literally not the same as a trans woman. Choose your words wisely, unless you're implying there's an equivalence there. They're not "accused of transphobia", they ARE transphobic.
Yeah, but why? It's something they're not telling.

Post Reply