Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Birthday Boy
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri 20 Dec 2024, 11:13 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1816 Post by Birthday Boy »

Vampires is not really a favourite of mine, and I tend to forget that it exists, but every once in a while when I remember that it exists, I am surprised by how much I actually like it. A solid album track I guess.

User avatar
telys
Posts: 2120
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1817 Post by telys »

Vampires is a fine track but the subject of the song is too much CTH for me to make it a marvellous album track. On the other hand I never delete it from my versions of the Nightlife tracklist (I always delete In denial and The Only one and add PLaying in the Streets).
----
You've got me all wrong

Sammy Jenkis
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat 18 Oct 2025, 6:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1818 Post by Sammy Jenkis »

One of the songs with the biggest disparity between the main body of the track (plodding) and the middle 8 (it's a reflex... euphoric).

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2430
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1819 Post by Gabby »

Sandy Shaw wrote: Sun 26 Apr 2026, 10:24 am
davidctecno wrote: Sat 25 Apr 2026, 2:54 pm Track 115: Vampires
Chronology: Nightlife, Track 6


Funny joke: "You´re a vampire, I´m a vampire too".It's not one of the best songs, but the nocturnal atmosphere and "vampiric" style fit the album's theme well. Neil's version is better than the overacted one from the musical Closer to Heaven.
I really like David Burt's CTH version as well as the Nightlife version - he sang the sh*t out of it!
The CTH versions fits well within the confines of the musical - pretty powerful stuff, but on it's own it's not an easy listen. The PSB version lacks that context and depth it really needs to work properly. It's OK but as has been much discussed, Nightlife was essentially the CTH teaser and didn't entirely work as a PSB album as a result.

rathound
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1820 Post by rathound »

There's a good song in there somewhere, but the end result isn't it. Nice melody, don't think the repetition of the chorus thing does it any favours.

User avatar
Sandy Shaw
Posts: 4966
Joined: Thu 29 Nov 2007, 8:36 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1821 Post by Sandy Shaw »

https://open.spotify.com/playlist/7moUY ... GhLfYQmi9U
I've sequenced all three versions of Vampires and added a couple of other vampire themed tracks. The Deep Purple track intro seems to be channelling It's a sin!
Last edited by Sandy Shaw on Mon 04 May 2026, 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm your puppet

User avatar
Drico One
Posts: 6222
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2003, 8:56 pm
Has thanked: 45 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1822 Post by Drico One »

Vampires is very beautiful - a slinky nocturnal pleasure with layers of atmosphere. But good grief. What in the heck is it doing on what purports to be a pop album? Had it been the theme song to some bloodsucking Hollywood movie starring Keanu Reeves, I'd say it was a masterpiece of the form. But on a pop album? At this point, it's clear that Nightlife is completely off reservation. We've had trance, synth and strings, hip hop, and country by this point. We have glam rock, disco, and showtunes to come. Nightlife is nothing if not eclectic, a smorgasbord of styles that really don't hold together.

In other words, they are all over the place. In Bilingual they were all over the world. Now, they are all over the shop, flailing around to put together something that might congeal into a coherent album. "It's about what happens at night" is a bit of an affectation. If this is what happens at night, maybe we'd all be better off calling it a day before 12. Certainly by track 6, things are getting weird. It's bad enough Neil coming over all Hulk Hogan with his "brother" and "sister" talk.

And yet it's still such a beautiful production and deeply evocative. But I can't help thinking substances have definitely been consumed by this point.

Drico.
The pale kid that hides in the attic behind his PC...

NOBODY75
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun 19 Oct 2025, 10:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1823 Post by NOBODY75 »

Drico One wrote: Tue 28 Apr 2026, 7:29 pm Vampires is very beautiful - a slinky nocturnal pleasure with layers of atmosphere. But good grief. What in the heck is it doing on what purports to be a pop album? Had it been the theme song to some bloodsucking Hollywood movie starring Keanu Reeves, I'd say it was a masterpiece of the form. But on a pop album? At this point, it's clear that Nightlife is completely off reservation. We've had trance, synth and strings, hip hop, and country by this point. We have glam rock, disco, and showtunes to come. Nightlife is nothing if not eclectic, a smorgasbord of styles that really don't hold together.

In other words, they are all over the place. In Bilingual they were all over the world. Now, they are all over the shop, flailing around to put together something that might congeal into a coherent album. "It's about what happens at night" is a bit of an affectation. If this is what happens at night, maybe we'd all be better off calling it a day before 12. Certainly by track 6, things are getting weird. It's bad enough Neil coming over all Hulk Hogan with his "brother" and "sister" talk.

And yet it's still such a beautiful production and deeply evocative. But I can't help thinking substances have definitely been consumed by this point.

Drico.
I was amazed that "Vampires" isn't a pop song... Although, well, I had the same thought, "What's this doing on a pop album?" many years later with "Hold On"... although in that case, I don't have nearly as good a feeling about the song as you do about "Vampires".

User avatar
Lleonard Pler
Posts: 1511
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1824 Post by Lleonard Pler »

I think sometimes we may be too clinical and overthinking. Pop music is primarily to be enjoyed.

I just played Nightlife this morning and I didn't notice disjointment, outdated sounds, didn't care for CTH musical that just a few attended. It's a good album that mixes electronics, orchestra and choirs to bring together an eclectic bunch of songs about toxic relationships and liberation.

Yes there are a couple of dull songs, but like there are on most PSB albums (even in some of their masterpieces).

As for Vampires, I hadn't listened in a while. It's beautiful and haunting, a metaphorical song about a toxic relationship that solves their problems with sex. It doesn't get more nightlife or even pop than that.

withanattitude
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri 03 May 2024, 9:12 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1825 Post by withanattitude »

I like the groove and easiness of Vampires, especially the lightweight piano riff. For me, it aged better then Happiness is an Option, which I really did like back then. Glad, I played it this morning again after years to get my opinion on it :).

NotInvisible
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2013, 7:58 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1826 Post by NotInvisible »

NOBODY75 wrote: Tue 28 Apr 2026, 11:05 pmI was amazed that "Vampires" isn't a pop song... Although, well, I had the same thought, "What's this doing on a pop album?" many years later with "Hold On"... although in that case, I don't have nearly as good a feeling about the song as you do about "Vampires".
Hold On is a masterpiece. You're all in trouble when we get to Elysium... :)

NOBODY75
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun 19 Oct 2025, 10:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1827 Post by NOBODY75 »

NotInvisible wrote: Wed 29 Apr 2026, 4:02 pm
NOBODY75 wrote: Tue 28 Apr 2026, 11:05 pmI was amazed that "Vampires" isn't a pop song... Although, well, I had the same thought, "What's this doing on a pop album?" many years later with "Hold On"... although in that case, I don't have nearly as good a feeling about the song as you do about "Vampires".
Hold On is a masterpiece. You're all in trouble when we get to Elysium... :)
:P When Ellysium arrives, Not Invisible,I know you and I will be just as far apart in our opinions as we were with Nightlife—both the worst Pets albums for you and me…but that's what makes it good. If we all agreed, it would be more boring, and I think it would also imply that their music isn't as rich and varied as it actually is.

davidctecno
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun 30 May 2010, 8:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1828 Post by davidctecno »

Track 116: Radiophonic
Chronology: Nightlife, Track 7


Another song produced by the duo with Rollo. It's a trance/hi-NRG style track inspired by retro sounds.
The demo is reminiscent of the Doctor Who theme and has a Kraftwerk vibe. Both versions are really cool and fit the Nightlife theme perfectly. From the next track onward (except for NYC Boy), the album goes downhill.

Capsigrany
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu 16 Oct 2025, 4:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1829 Post by Capsigrany »

An anthem. Trancey and euphoric, I don’t know why it has never appeared in any tour as it could be a high point (like it happens with Vocal). It is a personal favourite and I always think that Chris and Neil should explore more this kind of vibe. Love both Radiophonic and For your own good, a good pair.

NOBODY75
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun 19 Oct 2025, 10:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1830 Post by NOBODY75 »

The little brother of "For Your Own Good." A good album track. I never actively seek it out, but I enjoy it when it comes on. I think it's aged well.

Post Reply