Anyone else prefer the new In Private to the Dusty one?

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
!
Posts: 2327
Joined: Mon 23 Jan 2006, 7:13 pm

#16 Post by ! »

I think Elton John is the best thing about it! :P

And no, I'm not an Elton John "fan", I don't have any of his records and I only know that Are Your Ready For Love song from t'other year and his cover of Pinball Wizard.

User avatar
Jareth
Posts: 409
Joined: Mon 16 Jan 2006, 11:05 pm

#17 Post by Jareth »

Elton John is a much stronger vocalist than Dusty Springfield. Most of his material is dreadful however.

It's strange that people hate the backing music so much, yet the incredibly dated Ressurectionist seems to popular here. :?

Tanja

#18 Post by Tanja »

I love the Elton John/PSB version of "In Private" and it puzzles me why so many of you hate it. Elton is indeed a strong vocalist and sings perfectly and believably. I just think many of you are nostalgic. Often the first version seems better. I however, heard Dusty's version of "In Private" after I heard Elton's. Besides, I love Elton John. It's an honor for PSB to have Elton on their records.

User avatar
Twoism
Posts: 653
Joined: Tue 16 May 2006, 12:25 pm

#19 Post by Twoism »

I prefer the Dusty Springfield's version, thankyou :)

the last call
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun 02 Apr 2006, 3:00 pm

#20 Post by the last call »

Tanja wrote: It's an honor for PSB to have Elton on their records.
What kind of honor is that, if even Blue and Eminem have him.

fasto
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon 02 Aug 2004, 10:04 pm

#21 Post by fasto »

I agree that the backing on the new version is rather cheesy, however I prefer it to the old version because that was just too 70s disco / funky for my taste.
I think they tried to do what they did with Go West... take a funky disco tune and turn it into something you can listen to...

User avatar
Ronald42
Posts: 2237
Joined: Sat 08 Feb 2003, 11:04 am
Contact:

#22 Post by Ronald42 »

the last call wrote:
Tanja wrote: It's an honor for PSB to have Elton on their records.
What kind of honor is that, if even Blue and Eminem have him.
Hmm I read " It's a horror for PSB to have Elton on their records" and I 100% agreed. :lol:

The version sung by 2 man making it a gay item works very well I think. I prefer Dusty's version any time but there are some aspects of it i like very much. It has a good energy over it. If only they would have taken more time to proper record and produce it.It sounds like it was done in a hurry and that is never a good thing.
THE FUTURE THAT YOU ANTICIPATED HAS BEEN CANCELLED

blahblahblah

#23 Post by blahblahblah »

Hell this is a great version! Don't compare against the original, it's not comparable. Its a completely different version. Its unashamedly big gay pop at its very best. If they had just re-done the original version exactly the same but with a different singer to Dusty, then yes, you could compare the two, but they haven't. The sound, the production, everything is different and if you take it as it is, a cheesytastic, get off your ass and dance tune, then it is fantastic!

I LOVE IT!!!!

User avatar
Being boring
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat 31 Jul 2004, 9:59 pm

#24 Post by Being boring »

It's different. It now sounds very camp... much more than usual!

You can't replace the Dusty version though, it's simply a classic.
Keele University 09.02.02
Liverpool Summer Pops 02.07.06, Block N, Row A, Seat 4
Liverpool Echo Arena 13.07.09
Empress Ballroom, Blackpool 13.07.10
Manchester Arena 20.06.13
Empress Ballroom, Blackpool 16.06.14

patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

#25 Post by patrick »

Jareth wrote:It's strange that people hate the backing music so much, yet the incredibly dated Ressurectionist seems to popular here. :?
It's not that it's dated, it's that it's crap.

User avatar
Remark
Posts: 970
Joined: Fri 23 Jun 2006, 11:37 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

#26 Post by Remark »

blahblahblah wrote:Hell this is a great version! Don't compare against the original, it's not comparable. Its a completely different version. Its unashamedly big gay pop at its very best. If they had just re-done the original version exactly the same but with a different singer to Dusty, then yes, you could compare the two, but they haven't. The sound, the production, everything is different and if you take it as it is, a cheesytastic, get off your ass and dance tune, then it is fantastic!

I LOVE IT!!!!
Completely agree! Thank you for expressing that so eloquently...! I think the song is a great driving track, especially on a gorgeous day with the windows down... LOVE the bass line too!

<remark>

User avatar
gomorrah
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun 28 May 2006, 4:57 pm

#27 Post by gomorrah »

I love Dusty's version.
I wooooooooooooooood if I cooooooood...

Technotrancemix

#28 Post by Technotrancemix »

I think to get the best of of the track is to not compare it to the Dusty version

User avatar
Bang
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 9:54 pm

#29 Post by Bang »

I like both of them for different reasons. The new production makes it into a completely different experience from the original.

Burj

#30 Post by Burj »

the last call wrote:
Tanja wrote: It's an honor for PSB to have Elton on their records.
What kind of honor is that, if even Blue and Eminem have him.
For God's sake, this is a man (?) that's even made records with Cliff Richard and Ru Paul. PSB are hardly in esteemed company. :roll:

Post Reply