If you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to fear

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

#16 Post by patrick »

God, some of you people are idiots.

stew

#17 Post by stew »

patrick wrote:God, some of you people are idiots.
who the f*** are you?
Last edited by stew on Fri 11 Aug 2006, 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

stew

#18 Post by stew »

also personnal opinion politics should not thorugh music. End of. how about we get into a chat over the NF next. PSB have 1 and bet they would beglad to see some stupid lyrics over them and ID cards getting into this. How about we agree that nothing about yesterday has nothing to do with PSB or the next single.??
Last edited by stew on Fri 11 Aug 2006, 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

#19 Post by patrick »

stew wrote:who the f*** are you?
Someone who knows an idiot when he sees one gibbering away on the Internet. Obviously.

patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

#20 Post by patrick »

stew wrote:also personnal opinion politics should not o thorugh music
What do you think the point of art is?

stew

#21 Post by stew »

who cares were all idiots compared to you...
you havent even puta point across aboutany of this so i dont even know what you are trying to get at and also are we idiots coz were english and apparently we have no idea about terrorism or what as i no its the americans who beleive they own the right to opinions on this topic these days...

mate point of veiw is point of veiw so get a grip instead of just dissing everyone as you reckon your a know it all.

patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

#22 Post by patrick »

stew wrote:who cares were all idiots compared to you...
No, only those of you defending a police state.
also are we idiots coz were english and apparently we have no idea about terrorism or what as i no its the americans who beleive they own the right to opinions on this topic these days...
Where did you find this in anything I wrote? Idiot.

stew

#23 Post by stew »

patrick wrote:
stew wrote:who cares were all idiots compared to you...
No, only those of you defending a police state.
also are we idiots coz were english and apparently we have no idea about terrorism or what as i no its the americans who beleive they own the right to opinions on this topic these days...
Where did you find this in anything I wrote? Idiot.

so i will ask you again whats ya point ?

and what ya chatting police state?

just say what ya saying properly make ya point instead of calling us all idiots

One of the crowd
Posts: 4796
Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 3:42 pm

#24 Post by One of the crowd »

stew wrote:who cares were all idiots compared to you...
you havent even puta point across aboutany of this so i dont even know what you are trying to get at and also are we idiots coz were english and apparently we have no idea about terrorism or what as i no its the americans who beleive they own the right to opinions on this topic these days...

mate point of veiw is point of veiw so get a grip instead of just dissing everyone as you reckon your a know it all.
If you actually read Patrick's post...

God, some of you people are idiots.
One of the meanings of the word "Some" is...

"Being a portion or an unspecified number or quantity of a whole or group"

Whereas the meaning of the word "All" is...

"Being or representing the entire or total number, amount, or quantity"

Defintions from dictionary.com

patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

#25 Post by patrick »

Seriously. But then dim people never realize they're dim, do they? ;)

stew

#26 Post by stew »

yeh still no point made .

there is still no reason to insult

Being a portion or an unspecified number or quantity of a whole or group"

or

Being or representing the entire or total number, amount, or quantity

is there.

so instead of pulling out ya thesauraus or dictionary and having a go at me for no reason please take that into consideration.

so i will reapeat AGAIN.

still no point made from pratrick is there???

stew

#27 Post by stew »

patrick wrote:Seriously. But then dim people never realize they're dim, do they? ;)
guess they dont ?

patrick
Posts: 1215
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:32 pm

#28 Post by patrick »

stew wrote:there is still no reason to insult
Observations are not insults.
still no point made from pratrick is there???
You yourself alluded to my point upthread. :roll:

stew

#29 Post by stew »

yeh you said it.

you must be right big man! :roll:

One of the crowd
Posts: 4796
Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 3:42 pm

#30 Post by One of the crowd »

stew wrote:yeh still no point made .

there is still no reason to insult

Being a portion or an unspecified number or quantity of a whole or group"

or

Being or representing the entire or total number, amount, or quantity

is there.

so instead of pulling out ya thesauraus or dictionary and having a go at me for no reason please take that into consideration.

so i will reapeat AGAIN.

still no point made from pratrick is there???
1. I didnt insult. Whereas called Patrick Pratrick is.
2. Once again you failed to read the entire post. I even put at the end of my post where I got the definitions from - It was an online dictionary, there was no thesauraus in sight.
3. Patrick's initial post states "Some". Your post states "All". There is a difference which Im just trying to point out.
4. I dont think that is having a go at you.

See ya!

Post Reply