Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
Dog
Posts: 3856
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:41 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#16 Post by Dog »

Adding a bassline to a song, interestingly, wouldn’t usually translate into a songwriting credit.
Woof.

User avatar
onzio
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 12:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#17 Post by onzio »

Dog wrote: Tue 01 Jun 2021, 10:04 pm Adding a bassline to a song, interestingly, wouldn’t usually translate into a songwriting credit.
That's correct. the bassline is part of the arrangement and not of the writing.
To get writing credits you have to:

collaborate to the harmony of the track, i.e. chord sequence
collaborate to the melody, sequence of notes that identify sung or instrumental parts
collaborate to the lyrics

A bass line usually is a rythmic repetition with more or less variations on the root note of the chord.
It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
The Onzio on Spotify
The Onzio on YouTube
Expressing passion, explaining pain
This is my kind of music

User avatar
Spittingcat
Posts: 1420
Joined: Thu 27 Sep 2012, 11:11 am
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#18 Post by Spittingcat »

KLF's "The Manual" explains all this stuff really well... a fun read as well.

User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 4094
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 12:31 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#19 Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,
onzio wrote: Thu 03 Jun 2021, 9:02 am It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
So, if someone wanted... they could totally rip off the drum pattern and bassline from say, Blue Monday or West-End Girls, and that's totally allowable?

Retro. :)
"Politics are too emotional now. Contemporary culture generally is too emotional, really... I'd rather people looked to the truth." (Neil Tennant)

User avatar
telys
Posts: 2122
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#20 Post by telys »

retrofuturist wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 6:43 am Greetings,
onzio wrote: Thu 03 Jun 2021, 9:02 am It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
So, if someone wanted... they could totally rip off the drum pattern and bassline from say, Blue Monday or West-End Girls, and that's totally allowable?

Retro. :)
Well the bass can play the melody as well. I think Onzio refers to an underlying bassline which doesn't perform the melody.
It's understandable that Chris didn't receive writing credit but why didn't he get a performing credit?
----
You've got me all wrong

User avatar
Dog
Posts: 3856
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 10:41 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#21 Post by Dog »

telys wrote:
retrofuturist wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 6:43 am Greetings,
onzio wrote: Thu 03 Jun 2021, 9:02 am It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
So, if someone wanted... they could totally rip off the drum pattern and bassline from say, Blue Monday or West-End Girls, and that's totally allowable?

Retro. :)
Well the bass can play the melody as well. I think Onzio refers to an underlying bassline which doesn't perform the melody.
It's understandable that Chris didn't receive writing credit but why didn't he get a performing credit?
Maybe he didn’t play it on the record. Presumably it was programmed.
Woof.

Parkol
Posts: 1897
Joined: Thu 29 Dec 2005, 10:52 am

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#22 Post by Parkol »

Dissapointed
I listen to this song more often than others. I do not know why. An absolutely unique effect. You can listen to it constantly. Without Tennant, this song would be just a pass.

domino
Posts: 656
Joined: Sat 05 Jan 2019, 9:23 pm
Has thanked: 3 times

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#23 Post by domino »

Parkol wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 9:39 am Dissapointed
I listen to this song more often than others. I do not know why. An absolutely unique effect. You can listen to it constantly. Without Tennant, this song would be just a pass.
I think it's one of the most gorgeous, dreamy, summery songs of all time. From the lyrics to the instrumentation and arrangement, it's just perfection. I mean, just listen to those harmonies! :clap:
A blues would be in B flat, pain defining wisdom,
but the soul is in the high hat, programmed in the system.

User avatar
onzio
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue 28 Oct 2003, 12:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#24 Post by onzio »

retrofuturist wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 6:43 am Greetings,
onzio wrote: Thu 03 Jun 2021, 9:02 am It couldn't be copyrighted too. So is the drum/rythmic part-track.
So, if someone wanted... they could totally rip off the drum pattern and bassline from say, Blue Monday or West-End Girls, and that's totally allowable?

Retro. :)
It is very borderline, that is what courts and judges are for.
If it is recognizable probably you can get into trouble.
For the drum track the problem is when you sample it without permission. If you recreate it with your legitimate samples it is almost impossible to be charged with plagiarism.
The West End girls bassline is very peculiar, and probably could be considered a melody line. The Blue Monday one has been used on many records and no one credited NO. Oh also a chord sequence couldn't be copyrighted, if not together with its melody.
The Onzio on Spotify
The Onzio on YouTube
Expressing passion, explaining pain
This is my kind of music

bongsteve
Posts: 468
Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2007, 3:21 am

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#25 Post by bongsteve »

Parkol wrote: Fri 04 Jun 2021, 9:39 am Dissapointed
I listen to this song more often than others. I do not know why. An absolutely unique effect. You can listen to it constantly. Without Tennant, this song would be just a pass.
It really is a fantastic song. Hopeful that one day PSB will play it on tour.

bongsteve
Posts: 468
Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2007, 3:21 am

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#26 Post by bongsteve »

Has there ever been a good quality recording of electronic live? Everything I've found has pretty much been very bad audience bootlegs.

JK1974
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon 15 Jul 2024, 4:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#27 Post by JK1974 »

I recently uploaded the documentation "Pet Shop Boys - A popumentary" from MTV Europe in 1993. There is also a part where Electronic is interviewed: https://youtu.be/Vu6RmGzuaFw?t=732&si=f5vwg_Zin2m3a5EO.
In the end, Bernard Sumner says: "In fact I suggested, that they brought Chris down. They bringt Chris down. And: Bummer, bummer."

Since I am not a native speaker, I had problems understanding this part and give a proper German translation. Asking Google Translate or Deepl regarding "bringing sth./somebody down" I get the impression that it means that Chris should not be part of the collaboration (as Neil initially asked for it). So it was bad luck for him.
But in the next sequence, Chris says that they have a great sense of humor.

Or does "to bring Chris down" mean in this context, that he is also brought down to the studio and it is "bad luck" for Neil that Electronic also wanted Chris to take part in the collaboration? After the comment of Chris, Stephen Hague says that "Neil is Neil", "He is a special kind of person" etc.

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2451
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#28 Post by Gabby »

They mean "bring Chris along". The last part is a bit odd because I'm not sure if Bernard is saying they DID bring Chris or that they did not. Not sure "Bummer Bummer" is the actual right words said by Bernard there either but could be. "Bummer" is usually a word for being sad or casually upset - some use the word "Downer".

It is all a bit strange in that interview, but Bernard does say some obtuse things from time to time too, usually quite tongue in cheek.

User avatar
petshopgrrl
Posts: 786
Joined: Wed 03 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#29 Post by petshopgrrl »

JK1974 wrote: Thu 29 Aug 2024, 2:25 pm I recently uploaded the documentation "Pet Shop Boys - A popumentary" from MTV Europe in 1993. There is also a part where Electronic is interviewed: https://youtu.be/Vu6RmGzuaFw?t=732&si=f5vwg_Zin2m3a5EO.
In the end, Bernard Sumner says: "In fact I suggested, that they brought Chris down. They bringt Chris down. And: Bummer, bummer."
Yeah, I think it's a mistake. The whole transcript is having trouble keeping up with the disparate accents.* It's hard to hear because of the music but it doesn't sound as though Bernard IS bummed out by having Chris come along. If anything, it sounds more like... "Whammo bammo"...? Which would be a good thing? He's definitely smiling at the end of it.

Thanks for pointing this out - great documentary! I'm laughing at the way they keep spinning around and sneaking awkward looks at what the other is doing. :lol:

* ETA: For example, "flight on the water bridge" at 15.02 should read "fly on the wall approach"! :lol:
For your own good, call me tonight.

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2451
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Pet Shop Boys and Electronic fact/error

#30 Post by Gabby »

Interesting now I have watched it through.

Agree it's "Whammo bammo!"

Chris stuff about U2 and a Berlin album was, umm, Interesting, considering Hotspot and Elysium. Never say never I guess.

Post Reply