Pet Shop Boys Community

One of the crowd wrote:

stew wrote:yeh still no point made .

there is still no reason to insult

Being a portion or an unspecified number or quantity of a whole or group"

or

Being or representing the entire or total number, amount, or quantity

is there.

so instead of pulling out ya thesauraus or dictionary and having a go at me for no reason please take that into consideration.

so i will reapeat AGAIN.

still no point made from pratrick is there???

1. I didnt insult. Whereas called Patrick Pratrick is.
2. Once again you failed to read the entire post. I even put at the end of my post where I got the definitions from - It was an online dictionary, there was no thesauraus in sight.
3. Patrick's initial post states "Some". Your post states "All". There is a difference which Im just trying to point out.
4. I dont think that is having a go at you.

See ya!

tell ya what there is some clever guys on this forum sorry!
i totally apologise you are both right !
i will now go and kill myself with the shame that i have failed you both !
seriously lads get ya arses out and i will kiss them till the sun cums up tomorrow morning!
you are both clever and beautiful people i am nothing to you!

we ok now yeh?

what an idiot i am!
sorry!

One of the crowd wrote:Once again you failed to read the entire post.

He does seem to suffer in the reading comprehension department.

Patrick's initial post states "Some". Your post states "All". There is a difference which Im just trying to point out.

Funnily enough, he gets it right in his sig. Yet still seems worked up about it!

stew wrote:tell ya what there is some clever guys on this forum sorry!

Now is probably a good time for you to stop digging.

yo ladies what ya doing now

insulting aint ya

if a sorry aint good enough for ya then what ya want give it a f*** rest and to diss my reading is just going far yeh.

you gonna be insulting my mum next too?

patrick wrote:

stew wrote:tell ya what there is some clever guys on this forum sorry!

Now is probably a good time for you to stop digging.

give up then boy!

stew wrote:tell ya what there is some clever guys on this forum sorry!

The best thing youve written all evening!

stew wrote:i totally apologise you are both right !

Accepted

stew wrote: i will now go and kill myself with the shame that i have failed you both !

Please dont make a mess.

stew wrote:seriously lads get ya arses out and i will kiss them till the sun cums up tomorrow morning!

Is this the real Stew or re-incarnated one?

stew wrote:you are both clever and beautiful people

Your making me blush!

stew wrote: i am nothing to you!

Maybe

stew wrote:we ok now yeh?

what an idiot i am!

Have you been drinking young Man?

One of the crowd wrote:

stew wrote:tell ya what there is some clever guys on this forum sorry!

The best thing youve written all evening!

stew wrote:i totally apologise you are both right !

Accepted

stew wrote: i will now go and kill myself with the shame that i have failed you both !

Please dont make a mess.

stew wrote:seriously lads get ya arses out and i will kiss them till the sun cums up tomorrow morning!

Is this the real Stew or re-incarnated one?

stew wrote:you are both clever and beautiful people

Your making me blush!

stew wrote: i am nothing to you!

Maybe

stew wrote:we ok now yeh?

what an idiot i am!

Have you been drinking young Man?

problem the only thing anyone has ever said to you that involved the word beautiful aint it!
bet you heard sorry before though aint ya!!!

later mate!

stew wrote:yo ladies

This is perhaps not the best tack to use on a Pet Shop Boys message board.

if a sorry aint good enough for ya

A sincere apology would be fine.

to diss my reading is just going far yeh

My critique is a fair assessment of your behavior on this thread. You've completely missed the point of at least two posts and appear not to have fully comprehended several others.

patrick wrote:

stew wrote:yo ladies

This is perhaps not the best tack to use on a Pet Shop Boys message board.

if a sorry aint good enough for ya

A sincere apology would be fine.

to diss my reading is just going far yeh

My critique is a fair assessment of your behavior on this thread. You've completely missed the point of at least two posts and appear not to have fully comprehended several others.

ok ! your the boss patrick you says go yeh leave at that. youare starting to take the pee now its likethis really getting to you so lets leave it friend!

Undertaker wrote:
Terrorists aren't just scruffs with beards and no jobs. Whats stopping some executive walking on a plane with a bomb in his briefcase?

Well put.... they seem to or at one time profiled folks with long hair, piercings, missing fingers, no teeth and various other visual oddities for no good reason other than blatant stereotyping.

However, I haven't flown abroad in a few years so I can't speak for air travel overseas.

jasonjohn wrote:Obviously the current security crack down in London is a massive threat to civil liberties.

Neil and Chris should be there now performing an inpromptu concert to the waiting travellers

Having to wait three hours to get through security and being prevented from swigging a Coke onboard - unless you buy it from the airline - does seem to be a rather needless price to pay for Tony Blair and George Bush's bombing campaign in Afghanistan, invasion of Iraq, and craven one-eyed support for Israel at the expense of the Arab world.

Britons - a stoic lot, as they like to consider themselves - will no doubt happily accept this restriction without wondering just why it is them and not, say, Frenchmen, Germans, or Bulgarians enduring the police state treatment as they jet off to Torremolinos for a beery week laughing at funny foreigners' names.

Drico.

Undertaker wrote:Maybe but there was an incident a few years ago where some lunatic boarded a plane and tried to ignite a bomb that was hidden in the heel of his shoe.

Dave

And what's to stop someone sticking some semtex up his arse if he really wants to? By this logic we'll all need to be strip searched getting on planes next.

Quite frankly, it's all window dressing. The police have to be seen to be doing something - even if what they are doing is largely pointless and cosmetic. Daily Mail readers love it.

Drico.

Drico One wrote: And what's to stop someone sticking some semtex up his arse if he really wants to?

George Michael might read these boards. Don't give him idea's.

Dave

stats-freak wrote:I said before that I don't agree with the main message of the song Integral. The events in London this week clearly show that terrorism is a treat to Western societies. The ID-card thing in the UK may be ridiculous, but Pet Shop Boys went on to promote their album in interviews, saying the world is governed by fear, etc...

And it is. You should watch the documentary The Power of Nightmares. One more time, ID cards WILL NOT STOP TERRORISM OR TERRORIST ACTS. And, terrorism certainly isn't a 'treat' to western societies. But at least you agree that ID cards are ridiculous.

stew wrote:yo ladies what ya doing now

insulting aint ya

if a sorry aint good enough for ya then what ya want give it a f***ing rest and to diss my reading is just going far yeh.

you gonna be insulting my mum next too?

For f*** sake discostew, have you heard yourself? You're not on Pimp My Ride now. What's with the 'ya' business? You aren't Tim Westwood or Ali G by any chance are you?