Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

For 'Off Topic' and non-PSB music threads.
Message
Author
User avatar
tottenhammattspurs
Posts: 4706
Joined: Sat 04 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm

Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#1 Post by tottenhammattspurs »

(feel free to move to "off topic" but , for now , its kind of on topic.)

Stalling at 31. A brand new track, which is actually very very good. Great production and exactly the kind of sound that the fans like. Madonna's last effort stalling at SEVENTY THREE (!!) also. It's not boding well for established acts having "hits" anymore. ANy new PSB lead single is going to have to have one hell of a marketing campaign to even dent the top 40.

A big selling album is still possible off the back of a dissapointing chart placing (Keane) so its not the end of the world, im just really really surprised with the kylie track. If it were Cheryl "Im having that f***ing lolly or ahm gannae punch ya ha'way ya bastad" Cole singing it, it would be a nailed on top 5.
is is and isnt isnt

User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9951
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#2 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Maybe the gayers are all on holiday.

User avatar
lucienchardon
Posts: 1127
Joined: Thu 08 Jan 2004, 8:22 am

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#3 Post by lucienchardon »

tottenhammattspurs wrote:(feel free to move to "off topic" but , for now , its kind of on topic.)

Stalling at 31. A brand new track, which is actually very very good. Great production and exactly the kind of sound that the fans like. Madonna's last effort stalling at SEVENTY THREE (!!) also. It's not boding well for established acts having "hits" anymore. ANy new PSB lead single is going to have to have one hell of a marketing campaign to even dent the top 40.

A big selling album is still possible off the back of a dissapointing chart placing (Keane) so its not the end of the world, im just really really surprised with the kylie track. If it were Cheryl "Im having that f***ing lolly or ahm gannae punch ya ha'way ya bastad" Cole singing it, it would be a nailed on top 5.
Did the Kylie track get a lot of radio play? If not maybe it's not so surprising.

User avatar
agent doris
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 2:56 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#4 Post by agent doris »

No it didn't. It was a surprise release so I assume a lot of people didn't even realise it had even been releasesd!

User avatar
DominoDancing
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2006, 9:44 pm

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#5 Post by DominoDancing »

Not to be contrarian, but I don't agree with the song being very good. I actually think it's average, even a bit boring, since the melody is so unremarkable. Also, as agent doris said, the song just had no hype built up around its release, so the low entrance doesn't surprise me.

User avatar
Radiophonic
Posts: 5000
Joined: Sun 29 Apr 2007, 10:14 pm

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#6 Post by Radiophonic »

tottenhammattspurs wrote:(feel free to move to "off topic" but , for now , its kind of on topic.)

Stalling at 31. A brand new track, which is actually very very good. Great production and exactly the kind of sound that the fans like. Madonna's last effort stalling at SEVENTY THREE (!!) also. It's not boding well for established acts having "hits" anymore. ANy new PSB lead single is going to have to have one hell of a marketing campaign to even dent the top 40.
Although Kylie doesn't look it, she's in the same boat as Pet Shop Boys, Madonna, Ultravox and all those artists from the 1980s being seen a certain way. It would be like pop acts from the 50's and 60's trying to get a look in when Pet Shop Boys, Madonna etc were just starting.
"Enjoy it while it lasts ... "

Image

Bulldog

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#7 Post by Bulldog »

I'm from abroad and might be getting a little older but what's exactly the UK top 40 filled with these days? Along with Rihanna releasing a new single every week of the year since 2005 there doesn't seem to be such a flood of new pop music around these days...

User avatar
Radiophonic
Posts: 5000
Joined: Sun 29 Apr 2007, 10:14 pm

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#8 Post by Radiophonic »

bobo wrote:I'm from abroad and might be getting a little older but what's exactly the UK top 40 filled with these days?
Nagging narcissistic nursery rhymes and jingles over synthetic toy town backing that all sound the same.
"Enjoy it while it lasts ... "

Image

User avatar
Undertaker
Posts: 8983
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:16 pm

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#9 Post by Undertaker »

Radiophonic wrote:
bobo wrote:I'm from abroad and might be getting a little older but what's exactly the UK top 40 filled with these days?
Nagging narcissistic nursery rhymes and jingles over synthetic toy town backing that all sound the same.
Congratulations Vince and Andy :clap:

User avatar
Radiophonic
Posts: 5000
Joined: Sun 29 Apr 2007, 10:14 pm

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#10 Post by Radiophonic »

Undertaker wrote: Congratulations Vince and Andy :clap:
:lol: I don't think they've (dis)graced the UK top 40 in several years. I was talking about rap and what purports to be RnB these days.
"Enjoy it while it lasts ... "

Image

Palpatine
Posts: 1900
Joined: Sat 27 Mar 2004, 5:39 pm

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#11 Post by Palpatine »

Maybe I'm just showing my age, but the UK charts are the worst they've been in a long, long time. Even new music from established artists is subpar, i.e. Madonna's last three singles, Timebomb, etc.

User avatar
rabagast
Posts: 1007
Joined: Tue 25 Nov 2003, 12:57 pm

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#12 Post by rabagast »

Palpatine wrote:Maybe I'm just showing my age, but the UK charts are the worst they've been in a long, long time. Even new music from established artists is subpar, i.e. Madonna's last three singles, Timebomb, etc.
We're just getting old. Simple as that :P

User avatar
tottenhammattspurs
Posts: 4706
Joined: Sat 04 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#13 Post by tottenhammattspurs »

If Top Of The Pops were still on, we'd be tutting like our parents did back in the day
is is and isnt isnt

User avatar
karnsculpture
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri 20 Feb 2009, 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#14 Post by karnsculpture »

I think we're in a situation like the 60s and early 70s where singles were primarily bought by young people and albums were bought by adults, so with the exception of The Beatles who appealed to both audiences, the charts were very different from each other.

Older people still prefer physical formats, or at least prefer to buy download albums because they are seen as better value than buying each track at 99p. Kids will want to just buy the one song they want - I used to be like that - just buying singles for a couple of years until I started following particular artists so bought their albums. By the time I was 19/20 I was regularly buying albums. I believe it will be the same now as it was then.

User avatar
geowayne
Posts: 2130
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 5:43 am

Re: Kylie's Timebomb and disappointing chart placings

#15 Post by geowayne »

Radiophonic wrote:Although Kylie doesn't look it, she's in the same boat as Pet Shop Boys, Madonna, Ultravox and all those artists from the 1980s being seen a certain way. It would be like pop acts from the 50's and 60's trying to get a look in when Pet Shop Boys, Madonna etc were just starting.
True, the odds are against it. But it's not inconceivable. The Beach Boys had a #1 U.S./Australia hit (U.K. #25 and Top 10 in several nations on the continent) with "Kokomo" in 1988. And I think the odds of a significant PSB hit in the U.K. in 2012 are at least a little better than a #1 Beach Boys hit in the U.S. in 1988.

But, to be honest (and I do hate to say it), I wouldn't bet my paycheck on a Top 10 showing. In fact, at this point I would consider Top 20 a triumph.

Post Reply