Did Battleshop chart?

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
tweety
Posts: 1051
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004, 1:35 pm

#46 Post by tweety »

I blame Tampere.
"At one time singers had to use musicians to accompany them. Since synthesizers came along, singers can now play with themselves"

http://petshopboys.proboards58.com

User avatar
Flaffer
Posts: 3894
Joined: Wed 05 Nov 2003, 4:14 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

#47 Post by Flaffer »

jamie1978 wrote:They needed a shot in the arm to make them realise what a load of self-indulgent toss it all was, and that no-one apart from them cared about it
personally I think it's bloody good, although does drag in parts and nice to see them doing something different. Wonder if BP had been released (and even recorded) post the new album some opinions would be different ? There does seem to be a lot of vitriol directed at BP in the belief that it has delayed the new (more traditional) PSB album
Still waiting to hear the Adam Freeland, Manhattan Clique and Axwell mixes of Integral.

Eldritch
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am

#48 Post by Eldritch »

Flaffer wrote:a lot of vitriol directed at BP in the belief that it has delayed the new (more traditional) PSB album
That it has undeniably done, because the 70 minutes of new music on the cd must have taken them months to write and record. But still, like I posted earlier in this thread, I still stand by BP and consider it a solid work.
Click click drone

User avatar
rabagast
Posts: 1007
Joined: Tue 25 Nov 2003, 12:57 pm

#49 Post by rabagast »

Eldritch wrote:Their last minute decision to release it under the moniker Tennant/Lowe just confirms this – they didn't want to dilute PSB brand any further with more arty side projects.
They're credited as primarly as composers, as the norm is on classical releases. The copies have Pet Shop Boys stickers on them, so it's hardly a scheme to dilute the brand :D

User avatar
Zeus On The Loose
Posts: 3480
Joined: Wed 29 Oct 2003, 7:27 pm

#50 Post by Zeus On The Loose »

No, but it's a clever way to keep it rather low key and not ruin their chances of some hype when they come back properly.
Does cameos only.

User avatar
rabagast
Posts: 1007
Joined: Tue 25 Nov 2003, 12:57 pm

#51 Post by rabagast »

Zeus On The Loose wrote:No, but it's a clever way to keep it rather low key and not ruin their chances of some hype when they come back properly.
Agree. And this is a low key release. It's completely leftfield and obscure. And therefore it's strange when people expect it to perform like a pop album in the charts.

User avatar
Zeus On The Loose
Posts: 3480
Joined: Wed 29 Oct 2003, 7:27 pm

#52 Post by Zeus On The Loose »

People just expected to perform slightly better than it seemingly has based on how big PSB's cult following supposedly is, however, as I have said again, the amount of people who buy anything regardless is far lower than people around here tend to think and PSB singles/albums still perform heavily based on the occasional buyer. That's why Miracles did better than HAD, I get along and Flamboyant , more people liked it.
Does cameos only.

User avatar
Tenlow
Posts: 1296
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2003, 1:52 pm

#53 Post by Tenlow »

Though Home and dry might even have sold more copies in the UK - so it is not a sure fact that 'more people liked it' only because it got a better chart ranking...
Firing verbal shots like a tommy gun

User avatar
Dreamcatcher2003
Posts: 798
Joined: Wed 17 Dec 2003, 6:45 pm
Contact:

#54 Post by Dreamcatcher2003 »

Zeus On The Loose wrote:No, but it's a clever way to keep it rather low key and not ruin their chances of some hype when they come back properly.
And it surely suits better for an album released in Classical format- like Pavarotti and Friends, or Carreras, Domingo, Pavarotti- three tenors in concert- Tennant & Lowe- sounds more reposed....
The CELL by Stephen King instantly hit number 1 in New York Times Bookseller Lists selling well over 200 thousand copies in three weeks. This affirms my opinion: People really need an occassional good horror read...

Eldritch
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am

#55 Post by Eldritch »

rabagast wrote:They're credited as primarly as composers, as the norm is on classical releases.
But why should Battleship be considered as a classical release? It's electronic, very dance-y in parts and even has a couple of pop songs on the album. Experimental, wholly instrumental electronic stuff like Four Tet or Boards Of Canada is much more "classical", yet no-one would dream of looking their albums from a classical section.
Click click drone

Syncratic
Posts: 1452
Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004, 1:33 am

#56 Post by Syncratic »

I've often considered BOC classical. I don't see why classical music cannot feature electronics. btw, can't wait for their new album.

User avatar
jamie1978
Posts: 1539
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2003, 9:23 am

#57 Post by jamie1978 »

I think Zeus is to a degree correct, but I also think that it goes further than that.

I think a lot of people would count themselves as 'fans' of the Pet Shop Boys. However, unless they keep track of internet discussion forums, or happen to read the press on a certain day, they are unlikely to be aware of this release.

Singles like H&D, and Miracles, recieved 300-400 plays a week on UK Radio when they were released (I believe H&D even went top 5 in Europe in terms of radio play, though correct me if I am wrong). This, on top of countless TV performances for both singles, effectively galvanised the PSB faithful who do not, like us, track their activities when they are not releasing material.

I mean, how on earth is a casual fan going to be aware of this release? No advertising, minimal promotion on classical radio stations, and no real press buzz apart from the odd review here and there. Its quite clearly passed most people,

Eldritch
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2003, 8:24 am

#58 Post by Eldritch »

Syncratic wrote:I've often considered BOC classical. I don't see why classical music cannot feature electronics. btw, can't wait for their new album.
Of course it can. It's a question of presentation, really. With their hidden identities, clever anti-image and underground tactics and reference points BOC very much come from the electronica tradition instead of classical music – so that's why stuff like Geogaddi is considered electronic insteaad of classical.

With BP Neil and Chris could have gone either way in marketing. Nobody forced them to release BP as Tennant/Lowe, because "that's the rule of all classical releases".
Click click drone

User avatar
XTZ1969
Posts: 377
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005, 4:20 pm

#59 Post by XTZ1969 »

:?:
Last edited by XTZ1969 on Sun 12 Sep 2010, 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dreamcatcher2003
Posts: 798
Joined: Wed 17 Dec 2003, 6:45 pm
Contact:

#60 Post by Dreamcatcher2003 »

I guess only forum members bought it...
The CELL by Stephen King instantly hit number 1 in New York Times Bookseller Lists selling well over 200 thousand copies in three weeks. This affirms my opinion: People really need an occassional good horror read...

Post Reply