I hope you're right, though one might just as well assume that EMI think that a new PSB album need all the help it can get, and thus think that a date in May is less competitive than the original plan. Or maybe they have some other big albums coming out and decided that Neil and Chris could wait. If the delay was actually the result of a decision to heavily increase the promotion, wouldn't Neil be happy about this instead of complaining on his web site? One thing is for sure - the longer they delay the album, the higher the risk that when they come around to releasing it, everyone will have downloaded it months ago, and the actual release date will lose some of it's excitement.dgraysn wrote:it always amazes me that when given a little information, postings on this board of supposed PSB fans become so negative. here are my observations on whats going on:
the album has received great buzz from the few journalists/fans who have heard it. EMI has decided to make and actual effort to promote the album, hence the delay to plan ahead for the release. at the same time N&C are working on b sides for upcoming singles. seems like good news to me.
hopefully something will leak soon so we can all hear what the buzz is about.
As for the buzz from journalists and fans, I don't really think it's been any better or worse than what you always hear from the band's friends, the record company and the die-hard fans. If they didn't like the album, who on earth would? Every new album by any artist seems to be preceded by a "buzz" stemming mostly from the record company saying that it's their best work ever, or "the best since this and that".
I don't mean to sound pessimistic - I actually have great expectations for this album, as always with PSB. Still, I find it's better not to set oneself up for disappointment.