Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

For general discussion of Pet Shop Boys topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Patrick Bateman
Posts: 9952
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008, 4:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1861 Post by Patrick Bateman »

Track 119 : In Denial
Chronology: Nightlife, Track 10

Oh dear. I'm convinced that they were both off their faces around this time - how can a group that had made Being Boring release something like In Denial?

They've always liked some kitsch crap but previously that had only informed their work through a strange kind of alchemy - now they were making it themselves. Awful and unredeemable.

Capsigrany
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu 16 Oct 2025, 4:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1862 Post by Capsigrany »

A bad influence from the musical. Altough the production is great it does not fit Nightlife. Also a missed opportunity dueting with Kylie Minogue on this track; a Kylie duet would have been much better with a different kind of song. In my opinion a forgettable Nightlife track, same league as The only one and Happiness is an option.

Disco.
Posts: 2467
Joined: Sat 08 Oct 2011, 11:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1863 Post by Disco. »

It’s not that bad.

User avatar
Xakrij
Posts: 511
Joined: Tue 13 Dec 2016, 1:11 am
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1864 Post by Xakrij »

One word:
C-R-I-N-G-E
Shot in the fatal cause 'of frock-and-droll'

User avatar
Lleonard Pler
Posts: 1512
Joined: Sat 01 Nov 2003, 9:50 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1865 Post by Lleonard Pler »

I thought it was brave at the time. But it hasn't aged well. Now it's rather cringe, yes. I didn't know who Kylie was back then, little they knew that she would have another imperial phase just one year after Nightlife.

NOBODY75
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun 19 Oct 2025, 10:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1866 Post by NOBODY75 »

When I heard there was a collaboration with Kylie for Nightlife, I remember being excited for a big, fast-paced electropop track. Obviously, it was a disappointment. However, once I got over my initial expectations, the song isn't bad at all. I think the music is pretty good, the lyrics... Well... Let's just forget about them.

User avatar
MikeyC
Posts: 1937
Joined: Sat 07 Oct 2006, 5:28 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1867 Post by MikeyC »

It’s a beautiful song and you’re all on crack! 😎

User avatar
daveid
Posts: 3896
Joined: Sat 11 Feb 2006, 8:38 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1868 Post by daveid »

Good is a relative concept. By PSB standards this and T'only one are very poor, bordering on crap, despite the lush production.

User avatar
Gabby
Posts: 2430
Joined: Sun 17 Jan 2016, 5:31 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1869 Post by Gabby »

Even if we didn't already know it, this was clearly a song from a musical.

User avatar
leesmapman
Posts: 3572
Joined: Wed 03 May 2006, 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1870 Post by leesmapman »

It's OK imho. Not the best, not the worst from the album

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-A528B met Tapatalk


User avatar
Debussy
Posts: 856
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2003, 8:06 pm

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1871 Post by Debussy »

For me it's in the cringe bucket. A genuine skip on this album.
I don't believe they need collabs or features. None of them inspire me.

User avatar
telys
Posts: 2120
Joined: Tue 23 Jun 2015, 9:03 pm
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1872 Post by telys »

The first 40 seconds are good.
----
You've got me all wrong

rathound
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun 28 Dec 2025, 1:37 am
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1873 Post by rathound »

it may work in some settings. Not this though. not what I want from PSB and certainly not from a duet with Kylie. really starting to lose me at this point

Sammy Jenkis
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat 18 Oct 2025, 6:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1874 Post by Sammy Jenkis »

I used to quite enjoy In Denial but I've come around to the view in retrospect that it's not that great. The lyrics anchor the song in a very particular moment of lived experience and unlike other lyrics deprives the listener (irrespective of their gender ot sexuality) the capacity to make their own interpretation of the song. There are some nice musical touches and the Armstrong arrangement is thoughtful if maximal. However, "look at me, I'm sad" really is a dud lyric and deflates any momentum the song might have been building. Did I see the show in London during its first run? Yes I did. Once was enough.

User avatar
Drico One
Posts: 6222
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2003, 8:56 pm
Has thanked: 45 times
Contact:

Re: Track-by-Track: From Please to Nonetheless

#1875 Post by Drico One »

Great production, shame about the song.

TV channels - such as Sky - liked to use the backing track of this around release time for their programmes. They clearly knew something... But the story iself is hilariously naff. What a waste of Kylie.

This album really is sailing over the rainbow at this point, and laying waste to the Munchkins below.

Drico.
The pale kid that hides in the attic behind his PC...

Post Reply